I don't think kids today really appreciate just how tryhard edgy video game marketing was in the 90s.

White House staff should just make and show him an AI-generated video where he wins, fly him to Duluth and tell him it’s Oslo, and dare the New York Times to say anything more than “Experts disagree about whether Mr Trump was awarded the Nobel Prize”.

Because when you burn down a house and nobody ever rebuilds it, someone is still forced to live in the ashes

I won’t consider Discover to be good until it starts serving me Iranian mid-rise brick architecture

also das funktioniert schon auch als mittelzuverlässige Heuristik - Charakter ist ja related damit wie man sich präsentieren möchte. Ich hab allerdings das Gefühl das die die sowas sagen irgendwie Charakterstärke mit Charakterlosigkeit verwechseln

Schnulzige Liebesromane bedienen die weibliche Phantasie, dass sich ein cis Mann ehrlich für eine cis Frau interessieren könnte und ihr Wohlergehen ihm wichtig ist.

Pure Fiktion!

Petition "moving the goal posts" abzuschaffen. Jede Person jemals die das sagt ist weder in der Lage die goal posts noch die Bewegung zu erkennen

and no, algorithmically generating output data is something that does literally not in any way interact with the environment. It is fully passive and depends on active agents (i.e. users) to initiate interaction. This means contact with material reality has to be established by the material reality.

you are intellectually dishonest and not in the slightest interested to engage in argument. Which is totally fine, you dont have to. Most people dont even see value in that. But maybe dont pretend to know anything about the topic you pretend to be interested in idk

maybe you are aware of some niche definitions I am not firm with but instead of providing those you instead pretend consciousness wouldnt have criteria as if we dont have multiple centuries of research into what consciousness even means.

you are the one redefining words to fit your needs. As a mathmatician you hopefully know that arguments only ever are meaningful with they are based on useful definitions. Consciousness, complexity, closedness, reality, interaction all do have meanings to them which you actively choose to ignore.

wie plant ihr euren Kindern mal zu erklären was eigentlich eine ISS oder ein Astronaut sein soll jetzt wo es das nach 2030 nicht mehr geben wird

it is not an open system as it cannot get context from the world or interact with the world.

There is no goal post that moved. LLMs are necessarily physically closed. Your incomprehension of basic physics does not change that.

how about you get yourself a cool fresh glas of water, poor that on your CPU and see what happens

Brute Force is not intelligence even if the results are the same.

simulation is something we do on low-complexity machines to simulate systems to complex for proper computation, so no. you not even read my argument but just make the same statement that's already rejected.

LLMs are big. Gigantic even. LLMs are not complex but trivial. Both of these can be true.

also I never admitted that. I did exclude reinforcement learning to dodge the sidetrack to discuss why reinforcement learning does in fact also not even once interact with reality. That argument would require a philosophical depth outside of this conversation so I choose to just give you that one

LLMs are a physically closed system. Necessarily. As these are only code run on silicon within heavily protected and specifically designed microchips. It is physically impossible to have an LLM running on an open system as the hardware would break pretty fast.

I never once moved the goal post. Maybe read up on what that phrase means.

Also: If that sounds like "interacting with the physical world" for you, thats a skill issue on your part. What you describe does not once include interaction with reality. That is not within the semantics of your statement

Naja der Preis geht ja aber an eine politische Verbündete von Trump und wurde Trump gewidmet. Glaube der Frieden ist vorerst gewahrt.

Wenn wir jetzt drüber reden dass Manager und FDPler ja aber 60h pro Woche arbeiten ohne Probleme ist das natürlich auch wahr aber dann ist der Begriff "Arbeit" irreführend.

Kommt halt sehr stark auf die Branche an wie viel Arbeitszeitbetrug da möglich ist aber die Forschung sagt ziemlich deutlich dass 40h jenseits der menschlichen Leistungsfähigkeit liegt und insbesondere die erbringbare Leistung senkt im Vergleich zu zb 35h

Der Faschist Stephan Brandner und seine Anwält*innen greifen aktuell gezielt den Rechtsstaat an.

Das unterschlägt an der Stelle allerdings dass man nicht 40h ohne Burnout arbeiten kann