Sam Alcorn
@samalcorn.bsky.social
1.1K followers 1.1K following 1.7K posts
Housing abundance. Urbanism. Zoning abolitionist. Accessibility Compliance expert. YIMBY. Located in Tovaangar. #OverturnEuclid
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Sam Alcorn
mnolangray.bsky.social
Ladies and gentlemen, we did it. SB 79 has been signed.
Reposted by Sam Alcorn
cayimby.bsky.social
[VICTORY ALERT] Governor Newsom has signed SB 79, which will make it legal to build multi-family housing near high quality transit!

Our statement:
cayimby.org/news-events/...
cayimby.org
samalcorn.bsky.social
Vacancy trutherism is right up there with flat eartherism and RFK Jr-style anti-vaxxerism. They’re all sides of the same coin.
samalcorn.bsky.social
If only we had high-speed rail from LA to Sacramento by now… I remember how excited I was for that (and still am) back in 2008. When I was a child, I wrote a research paper about the Texas TGV project, which was killed with the help of heavy lobbying from Southwest Airlines.
samalcorn.bsky.social
I know SB 79 specifically excludes people-movers at airports. But I think the planned people-mover in Inglewood will count.
samalcorn.bsky.social
Exactly. The World Series metaphor is one I’m fond of.
samalcorn.bsky.social
I mean, it is used in a few places outside of the US, like Abu Dhabi and parts of Saudi Arabia.
samalcorn.bsky.social
It seems clear that the Trump regime is modeled on a pro-wrestling outfit, complete with speeches from Hulk Hogan at the RNC and Linda McMahon in the Cabinet. But don't they need some baby-face characters? How do you get by with entirely heels?
samalcorn.bsky.social
Also rates of smoking have declined substantially over that time. I wonder how much that has to do with the decreases.
Reposted by Sam Alcorn
ebwhamilton.bsky.social
Lmao who are the special interests pushing single-stair reform? Small scale multifamily infill developers who don't exist yet?
rorystolzenberg.bsky.social
NFPA responds to this Pew study showing modern multi-family housing is safer than detached houses with a column attacking single-stair reform.

Affordability arguments are "dubious" and pushed by "special interests" — citing high profits for… single-family homebuilders.

www.nfpa.org/news-blogs-a...
What some advocates and special interests in the building industry are now proposing around the country is an expansion of single-stair construction well beyond that threshold—in some cases allowing single-stair construction in buildings up to six stories tall. These changes are being pushed legislatively, some with literally no debate or input from safety officials, and outside the safeguards of an independent, consensus-driven code process.

...

In short, the fire safety record of newer buildings should not be used to justify shortcuts in the very process that made them safe. And, we should not rely on dubious estimates on affordability from the home building industry, which has posted record profits in recent years.

Housing affordability is a serious issue, but the solution can’t be sacrificing safety to protect developer profits. Everyone deserves a safe place to live, regardless of income, zip code, or building height.

NAHB’s New Study Provides Statistics and Data on Builder Financial Performance
...

The 2025 edition of The Cost of Doing Business Study reveals significant trends in the financial performance of builders:

On average, single-family builders reported higher gross and net profit margins in 2023 than in 2020. Their average 8.7% net profit margin was the highest in more than three decades and second only to the series peak of 10% in 1991.

The average gross profit margin increased from 18.2% in 2020 to 20.7% in 2023.
The average net profit margin rose from 7.0% to 8.7% during this period.


https://www.nahb.org/news-and-economics/press-releases/2025/04/nahbs-new-study-provides-statistics-and-data-on-builder-financial-performance?utm_source=chatgpt.com
samalcorn.bsky.social
Sure, but the NAHB lobbied hard against getting rid of a separate, more lenient code that applied to SFDs and duplexes, the same mechanism Veiller called for in 1913 to disincentive apartment buildings. It could have happened as part of the reorganization that resulted in the ICC, but it didn’t.