Shikhara Bhat
@shikharabhat.bsky.social
1.7K followers 1.1K following 160 posts
Theoretical evolutionary ecologist. Fond of math, coffee, natural history, and metal music. Kokkonut and PhD student at Uni Mainz, Germany. Past: BS-MS at IISER Pune, India. MS thesis at CES, IISc. Webpage: https://thepandalorian.github.io he/him
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
shikharabhat.bsky.social
Our (@vishuguttal.bsky.social and I) Synthesis of the effects of demographic stochasticity on eco-evolutionary dynamics is now out in @asn-amnat.bsky.social ! Feel free to message/email me if you need a copy or want to chat about the paper :)

🧬🌍🧪
shikharabhat.bsky.social
I'm not sure what (a) means biologically, but (b) seems to me to imply that we assume such mutations should arise (infinitely!) many times in the same mutational background - otherwise, why is a statement about expected/average behaviour meaningful given that we only observe a single realisation?
shikharabhat.bsky.social
Maybe I'm being obtuse, but isn't it still true that this benefit is either (a) over time, conditioned on non-extinction of the allele, or (b) over realizations, which is some sort of assumption about how often such alleles arise via mutation (?) if we are looking within a species.
shikharabhat.bsky.social
Why do we think these averages should tell us something meaningful about any given gene? Populations are typically not very large, and neither are clutch sizes so why is the average a useful metric?
shikharabhat.bsky.social
I'm likely missing something, but why do the averages matter? Doesn't "average" rely on a LLN argument, either over crosses (if these genotypes meet many times, you share the gene with your sib more often than not) or over clutch size (if you have many sibs, you share the gene with half of them)?
shikharabhat.bsky.social
*Maybe* if there were a large number of crosses of each type in every generation, LLN can kick in and ensure that IBD helps an individual estimate IBS.

This feels like a very strong, unjustified assumption given how wild populations of multicellular organisms typically work. What am I missing here?
shikharabhat.bsky.social
So why is IBD relevant?

Naively, I would think that for helping to spread, either individuals should be able to detect IBS (= some sort of greenbeard) rather than IBD. In particular, this means you ignore siblings/pedigree and only look for the green beard, so relatedness can be entirely ignored.
shikharabhat.bsky.social
the precise way to say "more likely" really depends on a law of large numbers (LLN) argument. In particular, LLN says that *on average*, half the siblings of a helper will be helpers, *given sufficiently many realisations*. This says nothing about what happens if your number of offspring is small.
shikharabhat.bsky.social
Ignoring other assortment processes (ex: spatial structure/limited dispersal), this means that helping spreads if you can detect which individuals are identical by state (IBS) at the helping locus. While we like to say a sibling is "more likely" to be IBD (and thus IBS) than a random individual,
shikharabhat.bsky.social
For simplicity, let's fix n=1 and say you believe that one locus models of "a gene for helping" (or similar) are plausible.

Classic theory suggests that if helping is costly, a mutant with the helping allele will spread if helpers can preferentially direct interactions towards other helpers.
shikharabhat.bsky.social
#evosky, a naive, theory-pilled question: Why is anybody who believes in n-locus models of cooperation for small n allowed to care about relatedness in the pedigree (IBD) sense?

A quick thread (please excuse any hyperbole, misrepresentation, or strawman arguments and point them out for me lol):
Reposted by Shikhara Bhat
sse-evolution.bsky.social
Nominations are now open for the Dobzhansky Prize, which recognizes the accomplishments and future promise of an outstanding early-career evolutionary biologist. The award includes $5000 and an award talk at the in-person Evolution meeting. Deadline: December 1
shorturl.at/p70wY
Text: Society for the Study of Evolution Dobzhansky Prize to recognize the accomplishments and future promise of an outstanding early-career evolutionary biologist. Nominations due December 1, 2025.
Reposted by Shikhara Bhat
scgriffith.bsky.social
from now on I'm just going to truncate the taylor series for sin at the first term. sin(x) = 0 for all x. this approximation

- is efficient to compute
- has bounded error
- has excellent analytic properties
- has very high accuracy for small values, which occur frequently in applications
shikharabhat.bsky.social
"When asked by the BBC whether he thought it might be a trick that his wife might play on him, Dr Ramsdell said: "I have a lot of friends, but they're not coordinated enough to pull off this joke""

Incredible
Reposted by Shikhara Bhat
szymekdr.bsky.social
Our newest paper is out in Methods in Ecol Evol @methodsinecoevol.bsky.social :) amazing team effort - we show that the traditional way of analyzing comparative data lacks finesse. besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/oidcS... w/ @itchyshin.bsky.social Yefeng Yang, Losia Lagisz & Ayumi Mizuno
Reposted by Shikhara Bhat
biologyjoe87.bsky.social
Excited to share a new pre-print in collaboration with @sebastianschreiber.bsky.social, "Using Modern Coexistence Theory to understand community disassembly"! We set out to understand how techniques used to study coexistence can be extended to understand community disassembly. (1/X)
Using modern coexistence theory to understand community disassembly
Community disassembly examines how species extinction alters ecological communities. Sometimes, the extinction of one species can trigger the loss of others, known as secondary extinction. These secon...
www.biorxiv.org
Reposted by Shikhara Bhat
eivimeycook.bsky.social
A fantastic few days of ageing talks, great people, and excellent food!

Massive thanks to (Hanna!) @kokkonut.bsky.social, Margaux Bieuville, Victor Ronget, and the fantastic people at The Gutenberg Workshops in the Life Sciences
Reposted by Shikhara Bhat
popgroup2026.bsky.social
Exciting news!
The next #PopGroup meeting will take place in Lille 🍟, France, 7–9 January 2026 – just 1 hour by train from London, Brussels, and Paris.

This year, PopGroup will also host ALPHY, the annual meeting of Evolutionary Genomics.

More info: populationgeneticsgroup.org.uk

See you there !
Population Genetics group 59
populationgeneticsgroup.org.uk
shikharabhat.bsky.social
yes but have you considered
Reposted by Shikhara Bhat
liamtaylor.bsky.social
Understanding the tradeoff between the tradeoff between the tradeoffs between current and future tradeoffs between future and current reproductive success is critical for evaluating long term trends in tradeoffs between current and future reproductive success.