Scott Kominers
@skominers.bsky.social
2K followers 990 following 190 posts
Market Design/Entrepreneurship Economist • Harvard Research Partner • a16z crypto Editor • Review of Economics and Statistics Puzzle writer & NFT enthusiast, QED | http://scottkom.com/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Scott Kominers
gregggonsalves.bsky.social
Violence is never the answer.
Reposted by Scott Kominers
Reposted by Scott Kominers
alroth.bsky.social
Evicting NSF from their building in Washington is pretty revealing. But if they auction off its History Wall, I know which tile I’d bid on. Here’s the list to choose from…
marketdesigner.blogspot.com/2025/06/evic...
Evicting Science from D.C.: the NSF building and it's History Wall
marketdesigner.blogspot.com
Reposted by Scott Kominers
vset.bsky.social
Tim Roughgarden (a16z crypto and Columbia) is giving a seminar on Thursday, 29 May 2025: "Shill-Proof Auctions" (with Andrew Komo and Scott Kominers). Guest panellists: Marek Pycia and Zhou Yu. @timroughgarden.bsky.social @skominers.bsky.social
Reposted by Scott Kominers
drkevinrmcclure.com
FYI “Spencer Foundation, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, William T. Grant Foundation and Kapor Foundation are providing quick turnaround grants of up to $25k for education scholars impacted by the abrupt NSF grant cancellations.” www.spencer.org/news/meeting...
Meeting the Moment Together
We are returning from the AERA Annual Meeting in Denver reinvigorated and with a deep appreciation for all that scholars and higher education leaders are holding in this moment. Rapid shifts in fed...
www.spencer.org
skominers.bsky.social
Happy Palindrome-Ambigram-Reflection Day, QED!!

I hope your day has been excellent in every possible direction 🙂🙃
Reposted by Scott Kominers
leahlitman.bsky.social
Once again, I was left to wonder: was Pete Hegseth signal chatting military attack plans to everyone but me??

Am I the one that’s insecure, or is it his communication practices that are insecure?
Carrie Bradshaw at her computer
skominers.bsky.social
Wordle 1,371 4/6*

⬛⬛⬛🟨🟩
⬛⬛🟨🟨🟩
🟨🟩🟨⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

@casssunstein.bsky.social and @rthaler.bsky.social must do Wordle today
skominers.bsky.social
Happy [PI / PurIm / EclPIse] Day!!

Hold some PIstachio hamantaschen up to the moon, QED 😄🤚📐🌑!

(And yes, of course, there's an NFT 👇)
skominers.bsky.social
Cross-posting an extremely niche social science joke x.com/skominers/st...
x.com
x.com
Reposted by Scott Kominers
muunver.bsky.social
On the amazing downfall of Alzheimer's research by widespread manipulations and the crooked incentive structure in science: www.nytimes.com/2025/01/24/o...
Opinion | The Long Shadow of Fraud in Alzheimer’s Research
Fraud in research needs to end.
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Scott Kominers
Reposted by Scott Kominers
skominers.bsky.social
What's the theory one would have to concoct to hypothesize the opposite of what this article finds? Maybe "postdocs who publish a lot of papers are probably tapped out and can't publish anything else now, whereas the ones who haven't are well rested and ready to start producing hit research soon."
skominers.bsky.social
What a time to be alive
shengwuli.bsky.social
Edited by Susan Fiske, who also described replication studies as “methodological terrorism”.
Reposted by Scott Kominers
shengwuli.bsky.social
Edited by Susan Fiske, who also described replication studies as “methodological terrorism”.
Reposted by Scott Kominers
jamesfeigenbaum.bsky.social
At least this one will surely replicate (as long as those evil replicators don't bring in any evil identification)
Reposted by Scott Kominers
nicholasgrossman.bsky.social
Inspectors General, the govt’s internal watchdogs, were a post-Watergate reform, reporting abuses to Congress.

Trump fired some IGs in term 1 after his first impeachment showed that Senate GOP will defend abuse.

Only reason to fire 17 IGs now is to abuse power and break the law with less pushback.
skominers.bsky.social
... which, to be fair, is basically what the authors say is their alternative hypothesis. But how could this ever be true in equilibrium?
skominers.bsky.social
To hypothesize a null effect, we would need to believe something like "the postdoc period is just a holding tank while people wait for faculty jobs to become available that reveals no information about the candidate and also has no impact on their eventual academic work"...
skominers.bsky.social
What's the theory one would have to concoct to hypothesize the opposite of what this article finds? Maybe "postdocs who publish a lot of papers are probably tapped out and can't publish anything else now, whereas the ones who haven't are well rested and ready to start producing hit research soon."
skominers.bsky.social
Should we be surprised that people who have positive publication trends during their postdocs are more likely to get faculty jobs? What could the counterfactual hypothesis have possibly been?