Stephanie Harrison
@stephaniehson.bsky.social
1.5K followers
94 following
210 posts
I’m a philosopher working to build a compassionate world
Founder of The New Happy, author of bestseller New Happy: www.thenewhappy.com
My newsletter: stephanieharrison.substack.com
We are here to help each other
Posts
Media
Videos
Starter Packs
Reposted by Stephanie Harrison
Michael Olesen
@molesen.bsky.social
· Aug 20
Why scientists are rethinking the immune effects of SARS-CoV-2
“Immunity debt,” a theory to explain the global surge in non-covid infections since pandemic restrictions were lifted, is increasingly being challenged by emerging evidence. Nick Tsergas reports
Myco...
www.bmj.com
"Pre-exisiting conditions" is a framework put on disabled people to diminish our deaths.
That's why some disabled people are very mad about the NYT note, and we were also very mad at the CDC under Biden saying only people with four or more pre-exisiting conditions are dying from Covid.
That's why some disabled people are very mad about the NYT note, and we were also very mad at the CDC under Biden saying only people with four or more pre-exisiting conditions are dying from Covid.
Reposted by Stephanie Harrison
Reposted by Stephanie Harrison
Dr Noor Bari
@njbbari3.bsky.social
· Jun 29
Reposted by Stephanie Harrison
Amanda Litman
@amandalitman.bsky.social
· Jun 25
ON TOP of the ethical reasons to not use AI, it's also
1) bad at what it does
2) literally makes you stupider
3) has HUGE environmental costs: every search is equivalent to pouring out an entire bottle of water. It's not worth it to generate a cutesy emoji or have it write an error-riddled draft.
1) bad at what it does
2) literally makes you stupider
3) has HUGE environmental costs: every search is equivalent to pouring out an entire bottle of water. It's not worth it to generate a cutesy emoji or have it write an error-riddled draft.
AI was trained on my books (without my permission and against my will) so this annoys me. I never use AI. Not for research, not for images, not for writing. AI used me.
Reposted by Stephanie Harrison
Celeste Ng
@pronounced-ing.bsky.social
· Jun 15
AI was trained on my books (without my permission and against my will) so this annoys me. I never use AI. Not for research, not for images, not for writing. AI used me.
I keep seeing reports of non-AI users being told that an AI detector has dubbed their work AI generated, and it makes me insane because:
1) AI detection tools *are themselves AI* and thus entirely bullshit; and
2) if an AI was trained on your works, of COURSE it’ll flag you as sounding “like” AI!
1) AI detection tools *are themselves AI* and thus entirely bullshit; and
2) if an AI was trained on your works, of COURSE it’ll flag you as sounding “like” AI!
Reposted by Stephanie Harrison