@zbr13.bsky.social
Reposted
Reposted
Trump hypes his new healthcare plan of asking healthcare companies to lower prices
December 20, 2025 at 2:26 AM
Trump hypes his new healthcare plan of asking healthcare companies to lower prices
Reposted
ah yes that is what this administration is known for, respecting judges’ orders
Blanche: "There were a number of photos that were pulled down after being released. That's bc a judge in NY ordered us to listen to any victim if they have concerns... even though there's repeated attempts by Dems to paint President Trump as part of the Epstein saga, it's failing over & over again"
December 21, 2025 at 2:48 PM
ah yes that is what this administration is known for, respecting judges’ orders
Reposted
Mr Blanche you've been working on this for many months now
Just release everything
Just release everything
December 21, 2025 at 3:16 PM
Mr Blanche you've been working on this for many months now
Just release everything
Just release everything
Reposted
WELKER: Why was Ghislaine Maxwell moved just days after you interviewed her?
BLANCHE: That's a Bureau of Prisons security issue that I will not talk about
WELKER: Did you have anything to do with it?
BLANCHE: I am responsible for the Bureau of Prisons, so every decision they make lands on my desk
BLANCHE: That's a Bureau of Prisons security issue that I will not talk about
WELKER: Did you have anything to do with it?
BLANCHE: I am responsible for the Bureau of Prisons, so every decision they make lands on my desk
December 21, 2025 at 3:17 PM
WELKER: Why was Ghislaine Maxwell moved just days after you interviewed her?
BLANCHE: That's a Bureau of Prisons security issue that I will not talk about
WELKER: Did you have anything to do with it?
BLANCHE: I am responsible for the Bureau of Prisons, so every decision they make lands on my desk
BLANCHE: That's a Bureau of Prisons security issue that I will not talk about
WELKER: Did you have anything to do with it?
BLANCHE: I am responsible for the Bureau of Prisons, so every decision they make lands on my desk
Reposted
One thing worth remembering as all of this Epstein stuff roils is that we know of multiple occasions in which women were paid to keep them from talking about having sex with Trump.
WELKER: Why was this photo of a desk with a drawer open containing photos of Trump taken down?
BLANCHE: You can see in that photo there are photos of women. We learned there were concerns about them.
W: Are you saying those women are victims of Epstein?
B: No, that's not what I'm saying.
BLANCHE: You can see in that photo there are photos of women. We learned there were concerns about them.
W: Are you saying those women are victims of Epstein?
B: No, that's not what I'm saying.
December 21, 2025 at 3:06 PM
One thing worth remembering as all of this Epstein stuff roils is that we know of multiple occasions in which women were paid to keep them from talking about having sex with Trump.
Reposted
Khanna: "It's not about the timeline. It's about the selective concealment."
December 21, 2025 at 3:40 PM
Khanna: "It's not about the timeline. It's about the selective concealment."
Reposted
Massie: "Blanche is using a different theory that wouldn't survive first contact with any court, which is he's trying to say that prior laws override our law. That's not the way this works."
December 21, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Massie: "Blanche is using a different theory that wouldn't survive first contact with any court, which is he's trying to say that prior laws override our law. That's not the way this works."
Reposted
Khanna: "The problem here is there are rich and powerful people who either engaged in this abuse, covered it up, or we're on this island. What the American people want to know is who are these people? Instead of holding them accountable, Pam Bondi is breaking the law."
December 21, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Khanna: "The problem here is there are rich and powerful people who either engaged in this abuse, covered it up, or we're on this island. What the American people want to know is who are these people? Instead of holding them accountable, Pam Bondi is breaking the law."
Reposted
BRENNAN: What are you going to do to force DOJ to comply?
MASSIE: The quickest way and most expeditious way to get justice for these victims is to bring inherent contempt against Pam Bondi. That doesn't require going through the courts. We're drafting that right now.
MASSIE: The quickest way and most expeditious way to get justice for these victims is to bring inherent contempt against Pam Bondi. That doesn't require going through the courts. We're drafting that right now.
December 21, 2025 at 3:43 PM
BRENNAN: What are you going to do to force DOJ to comply?
MASSIE: The quickest way and most expeditious way to get justice for these victims is to bring inherent contempt against Pam Bondi. That doesn't require going through the courts. We're drafting that right now.
MASSIE: The quickest way and most expeditious way to get justice for these victims is to bring inherent contempt against Pam Bondi. That doesn't require going through the courts. We're drafting that right now.
Reposted
Just walked right into that one.
WELKER: Why was this photo of a desk with a drawer open containing photos of Trump taken down?
BLANCHE: You can see in that photo there are photos of women. We learned there were concerns about them.
W: Are you saying those women are victims of Epstein?
B: No, that's not what I'm saying.
BLANCHE: You can see in that photo there are photos of women. We learned there were concerns about them.
W: Are you saying those women are victims of Epstein?
B: No, that's not what I'm saying.
December 21, 2025 at 3:54 PM
Just walked right into that one.
Reposted
Fun fact: It’s easy to keep premiums low when you only have to insure healthy people.
LANKFORD: In 2010, before Obamacare kicked in, the normal healthcare premium was $215.
HUNT: Right. But insurance companies could refuse to cover you for a preexisting condition
LANKFORD: That's true.
HUNT: Right. But insurance companies could refuse to cover you for a preexisting condition
LANKFORD: That's true.
December 21, 2025 at 3:58 PM
Fun fact: It’s easy to keep premiums low when you only have to insure healthy people.
Reposted
What a shameful question.
First, it is not what Congress "asked for." It is what a federal statute REQUIRES.
Second, WTF does "spirit but not intent" even mean?
CBS bent a knee and paid Trump, it has a new owner who wants to please Trump, and sadly this is the result.
First, it is not what Congress "asked for." It is what a federal statute REQUIRES.
Second, WTF does "spirit but not intent" even mean?
CBS bent a knee and paid Trump, it has a new owner who wants to please Trump, and sadly this is the result.
BRENNAN: This isn't everything you asked for just yet, but would you acknowledge that they are complying with the spirit if not the intent of your law?
MASSIE: No. They're flouting the spirit and the letter of the law. It's very troubling the posture that they've taken.
MASSIE: No. They're flouting the spirit and the letter of the law. It's very troubling the posture that they've taken.
December 21, 2025 at 4:04 PM
What a shameful question.
First, it is not what Congress "asked for." It is what a federal statute REQUIRES.
Second, WTF does "spirit but not intent" even mean?
CBS bent a knee and paid Trump, it has a new owner who wants to please Trump, and sadly this is the result.
First, it is not what Congress "asked for." It is what a federal statute REQUIRES.
Second, WTF does "spirit but not intent" even mean?
CBS bent a knee and paid Trump, it has a new owner who wants to please Trump, and sadly this is the result.
Reposted
HASSETT: If the Supreme Court doesn't find with us, refunds would go to whoever cut the check for the tariff
BRENNAN: Doesn't the administration claim it was the country that paid that?
HASSETT: Uhh --
BRENNAN: Doesn't the administration claim it was the country that paid that?
HASSETT: Uhh --
December 21, 2025 at 4:11 PM
HASSETT: If the Supreme Court doesn't find with us, refunds would go to whoever cut the check for the tariff
BRENNAN: Doesn't the administration claim it was the country that paid that?
HASSETT: Uhh --
BRENNAN: Doesn't the administration claim it was the country that paid that?
HASSETT: Uhh --
Reposted
Rand Paul on Erika Kirk and Marco Rubio endorsing JD Vance: "I think there needs to be representatives in the GOP who still believe international trade is good, who still believe in free market capitalism, who still believe in low taxes."
Karl: "And that's not JD Vance?"
Paul: "No"
Karl: "And that's not JD Vance?"
Paul: "No"
December 21, 2025 at 4:39 PM
Rand Paul on Erika Kirk and Marco Rubio endorsing JD Vance: "I think there needs to be representatives in the GOP who still believe international trade is good, who still believe in free market capitalism, who still believe in low taxes."
Karl: "And that's not JD Vance?"
Paul: "No"
Karl: "And that's not JD Vance?"
Paul: "No"
Reposted
What? This is not the proper behavior expected from the recipient of the FIFA Peace Prize.
Trump on Venezuela: "They took all of our oil and we want it back. They illegally took it."
December 21, 2025 at 3:30 PM
What? This is not the proper behavior expected from the recipient of the FIFA Peace Prize.
Chilling
December 21, 2025 at 5:19 PM
Chilling
Reposted
The most transparent regime
In our entire US HISTORY
🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕
In our entire US HISTORY
🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕
December 20, 2025 at 1:09 PM
The most transparent regime
In our entire US HISTORY
🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕
In our entire US HISTORY
🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕
Reposted
Reposted
Alright. Everyone can stop now. We have a winner.
these documents are more blacked out than Pete Hegseth on New Years Eve
December 19, 2025 at 10:43 PM
Alright. Everyone can stop now. We have a winner.
Reposted
Pamela Jo Bondi, doing her part to help an administration that calls itself, with a seemingly straight face, "The Most Transparent in American History."
December 21, 2025 at 1:49 AM
Pamela Jo Bondi, doing her part to help an administration that calls itself, with a seemingly straight face, "The Most Transparent in American History."
Reposted
Reposted
Putin didn’t want Kellogg. He wouldn’t be pliable enough for Russian demands, and was “too hostile.”
Putin wanted a negotiator who “didn’t know much about Russia” and would reliably echo Putin's lines on Ukraine.
Hence the insistence that Witkoff meet Putin without U.S. government or CIA officials.
Putin wanted a negotiator who “didn’t know much about Russia” and would reliably echo Putin's lines on Ukraine.
Hence the insistence that Witkoff meet Putin without U.S. government or CIA officials.
December 20, 2025 at 11:08 PM
Putin didn’t want Kellogg. He wouldn’t be pliable enough for Russian demands, and was “too hostile.”
Putin wanted a negotiator who “didn’t know much about Russia” and would reliably echo Putin's lines on Ukraine.
Hence the insistence that Witkoff meet Putin without U.S. government or CIA officials.
Putin wanted a negotiator who “didn’t know much about Russia” and would reliably echo Putin's lines on Ukraine.
Hence the insistence that Witkoff meet Putin without U.S. government or CIA officials.
Reposted
What? Just lazily stating that a peace deal exists doesn’t lead to real peace?
www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/202...
www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/202...
Opinion | Why Trump’s ‘peace deals’ keep unraveling
Ending wars requires patient diplomacy and a longterm commitment, not flashy headlines.
www.washingtonpost.com
December 21, 2025 at 3:16 PM
What? Just lazily stating that a peace deal exists doesn’t lead to real peace?
www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/202...
www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/202...
Reposted
It's hard to fathom but we are now *here* on this path to fascism.
December 18, 2025 at 9:07 PM