Energy systems modeling, economics, policy | IPCC, NCA, Stanford/CMU alum | Views my own
Read more here: www.epri.com/research/pro...
If you only look at one figure, check out the capacity additions vs. history. It's the "are we staffed for this?" chart.
I'll do a longer post later today.
Short version: load growth, state policy, federal incentives, and exports are colliding. These collisions alter build rates, fuel deliverability, and customer bills.
Reposted by John Bistline
For details from the USGS:
Reposted by John Bistline
For details from the USGS:
1. Planning
2. Rate design and cost allocation (avoid cost shifting)
3. Demand flexibility
Read the white paper here: winwin.epri.com
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
📉 U.S. coal production: ~884M tons (1985) → ~513M (2024)
📉 Coal mining employment: ~174k (1985) → ~43k (2024)
Automation meant jobs fell faster than production.
For scale, Tesla has ~120k U.S. employees... ~3x the mining workforce.
Reposted by Rebecca Solnit, John R. Hutchinson, Cailin O’Connor
Reposted by John Bistline
To hit net-zero by 2050, the pace of decarbonization would need to roughly triple.
We're now closer to 2050 than the first season of Survivor.
Here's the 2025 update: iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1...
Reposted by Daniel Huppmann, Hisham Zerriffi
This is similar to Zheng et al.: Even >3x interregional transmission only cuts costs of a zero-emissions 2050 system by ~7% (lots of substitutes: storage, siting, nuclear). Reliability benefits can be larger than pure $ savings: arxiv.org/abs/2402.14189