Anne Joseph O’Connell
@ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
19K followers 940 following 500 posts
Administrative law & bureaucracy obsessed Stanford Law School professor; former ACUS council member (fired by Trump); writing book, Stand-Ins (on temporary leaders in government, business, & religion); mom of two
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
Want to know more about vacancies in Senate-confirmed positions -- their causes, consequences, legal implications, and policy reforms? I wrote a primer aimed at social scientists and those who who like the social sciences. effectivegov.uchicago.edu/primers/bure...
Bureaucratic Vacancies
effectivegov.uchicago.edu
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
Try 2: He named himself 1st asst. Seems like 1st asst is an inferior office, requiring head to name. Also brings up the ? from US Attorney cases about whether you can name a 1st asst after a vacancy. I think yes (if it's the director), but Congress needs to limit. www.nytimes.com/2025/10/06/u...
C.I.A. Deputy Director Has Replaced Agency’s Top Legal Official With Himself
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Anne Joseph O’Connell
donmoyn.bsky.social
The unitary executive theory puts all the power of the executive branch in the hands of one person. That is a problem when he is unaware of some pretty big decisions being made by his underlings.
dansaltzstein.bsky.social
“Mr. Trump was first told of the cuts by Ms. Hochul during a phone call on Sunday evening, according to three people with knowledge of the conversation.”
Trump Administration Reverses $187 Million in N.Y. Counterterrorism Cuts
www.nytimes.com
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
Right, thanks! I think it’s the same. I can see the argument both ways on whether 546 can be used again after the court pick “leaves” the job before someone is confirmed. What a mess!
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
Trump fired the then-court pick, creating a new vacancy under 546. Whelan’s reading creates SOP difficulties—as President must be able to fire temporary US attorneys under Supremes’ view of removal of executive officers. You could argue that President can fire and then turn to FVRA (but not 546). 2/
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
Does look like 546, and not FVRA (title on indictment doesn’t say acting & FVRA would not allow her to be nominee). Not sure I agree with Whelan, however. It’s not successive AG appointments. There was a court appointment under 546 that took effect (unlike Desiree Grace in DNJ). 1/
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
The Habba judge said you cannot name 1st assistants after a vacancy (1st court to do so though Cuccinelli case came close). OLC, GAO & many others think you can name a 1st assistant after vacancy (& Administrations have relied on post-vacancy 1st assistants -- that's how Biden staffed up quickly).
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
We could have a competition. Sigh. But mine cannot grow anymore as it is published… and I am a bit mortified by it all.
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
Agreements are easy, binding compacts are harder!
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
There is a compact clause in the Constitution….
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
As @jamesgoodwin.bsky.social pointed out only if involving federal law but that could take some stuff all the table in an all RRepublican government (by maybe not public health).
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
Agreed, and hopefully some would fit in under state law police power that covers public health!
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
Such compacts require congressional approval, right?
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
Formal compacts need congressional approval, making the 2026 election even more critical.
Reposted by Anne Joseph O’Connell
traceytully.bsky.social
I spent the last several days wandering around federal courthouses in NJ to see how a judicial ruling, which concluded Alina Habba had no authority to be the state’s top prosecutor, was affecting criminal cases.

>> Here’s what I saw and heard. w/ @jonesieman.bsky.social
Inside the Crisis Gripping New Jersey’s Federal Courts
www.nytimes.com
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
Because the government needs delegation and actings to function (and the Dems need them more given political dynamics), I do want CA3 to reverse on at least one of those. Bad facts can make bad law…
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
The judge in the Habba litigation talked about Grace’s firing. You could tell he didn’t believe the X posts — Government produced a statement by Sergio Gor (PPO) saying he talked to Trump and then Gor fired Grace. And the judge grudgingly says ok have to take this statement as no contrary evidence.
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
So Trump is in trouble for firing people he can’t—inferior officers chosen by department heads (IAF, Copyright Registrar)—and then department heads are trying to fire PAS folks. Oosh.
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
Although I think the Vacancies Act is broader (than the ruling today), which would help Dems >> Reps, I went back to Biden's start on DNJ's US Attorney. When the confirmed Trump 1.0 person left 1/5, his first assistant (career person) became acting and stayed until Biden's pick was confirmed. Norms.
booker.senate.gov
Trump's manipulation of the law to install his personal attorney, Alina Habba, as U.S. Attorney was clearly unlawful as the court recognized today. This legal limbo continues to thwart our prosecutors’ ability to tackle crime in every federal case across the state, putting public safety at risk.
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
Two smaller acting/interim issues in ruling specific to US Attys: (1) Court holds Vacancies Act is available, even though there is the 28 USC 546 provision (only win in ruling for government). (2) Court holds under 546, AG gets only 120 days from initial appointment so 120 days ran out on July 1.
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
Modern agencies run on delegation in face of broken appointments process. If only the head of the department can do these vacant lower level Senate-confirmed jobs, agencies will grind to a halt. Court does allows head to ratify decisions but still big deal. FEMA is being run through delegation now.
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
2nd issue is bigger deal: positions covered by Vacancies Act cannot be delegated downward. (Govt claimed Habba can do the job without acting title). D Montana ruled similarly in Trump 1.0 but no court of appeals has so held. Indeed, Federal Circuit permitted in Arthrex, Supremes did not grant cert.
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
I think first assistants can be named after a vacancy but think text is unclear. For more, see columbialawreview.org/wp-content/u...
columbialawreview.org
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
Also, FVRA allows alternatives to first assistants: President can name another Senate-confirmed person as an acting (Rubio; Bessent) or a sufficiently senior person in the agency who has been in the agency at least 90 days in the year before the vacancy.
ajosephoconnell.bsky.social
PAS officials from outgoing administration often leave before incoming administration's first assistants are named. Issue results from statutory ambiguity and is something Congress could clearly fix, perhaps by allowing post-vacancy first assistants in the first 180 days of a new administration.