The TIG1-high state exists in human lung club and ciliated cells, enriched in IPF patients and tobacco users. Different viruses target different states. Influenza A prefers KRT8-high cells. Arjun Raj @cp-cell.bsky.social
doi.org/10.1016/j.ce... 🧪
3/3

Data and experiments move faster, but theory is what gives discovery direction, via @arjunraj.bsky.social
arjunrajlab.substack.com/p/chance-fav...

libertypuzzles.com these are very nice

Where do you get your groceries? Where are your retirement funds invested? Etc.

I gotta say… it’s just less fun here. I want it to work, but…

Congratulations!!

I can say that the discussion on X are definitely more interesting. Here, it’s like AI isn’t even happening.

Both, and things in between. It’s highly variable as to how much it can do autonomously in both cases. Probably depends on how much training data there is.

Both. General purpose non-coding agent ;).

Huh. I think the scope it can handle probably depends on the nature of the challenge (how much it is in distribution) and on the planning and amount of testing you have in place. I have found it able to do some pretty remarkable features, one-shotting a lot of non-trivial boilerplate.

Haven't run into trouble yet! But I've been sadly too busy to code as much as I have wanted.

What I have not explored but should is non-coding uses.

Much to say, but to summarize: 🤯

I think that’s the first sign of the apocalypse, no?

To me, the mean loud position here ranges between ignoring the ai and wishing to fully ban it. The latter won't happen (I don't think even regulation is technically feasible), the former is massively unproductive. If scientists refuse to participate in the discussion,it will just be driven by others

Congratulations on tenure!