Bad FCC / Fairness Doctrine Takes
@badfcctakes.bsky.social
If you've see your words screenshotted here, it probably means you brought up a very, very bad take on the Fairness Doctrine or other FCC regulation you didn't understand.
Repost = good take. Screenshot = bad take
Repost = good take. Screenshot = bad take
Pinned
If you believe the Fairness Doctrine did any of the following, then you may see your posts appear on this page.
Thankful that there doesn't seem to be many terrible FCC or Fairness Doctrine posts to highlight today.
Maybe people are learning? Naah....that probably isn't it.
Maybe people are learning? Naah....that probably isn't it.
November 28, 2025 at 12:45 AM
Thankful that there doesn't seem to be many terrible FCC or Fairness Doctrine posts to highlight today.
Maybe people are learning? Naah....that probably isn't it.
Maybe people are learning? Naah....that probably isn't it.
Where did people get the idea that the Fairness Doctrine set some sort of "news standard"?
Oh, right. Memes.
Oh, right. Memes.
November 28, 2025 at 12:41 AM
Where did people get the idea that the Fairness Doctrine set some sort of "news standard"?
Oh, right. Memes.
Oh, right. Memes.
Yeah, their "license".... 🙄
November 28, 2025 at 12:39 AM
Yeah, their "license".... 🙄
This policy is still in effect.
November 28, 2025 at 12:36 AM
This policy is still in effect.
The Fairness Doctrine was responsible for everything, apparently.
November 25, 2025 at 6:47 PM
The Fairness Doctrine was responsible for everything, apparently.
The Fairness Doctrine never prevented anyone from spewing propaganda nor from calling it news (or anything else, for that matter).
November 25, 2025 at 6:45 PM
The Fairness Doctrine never prevented anyone from spewing propaganda nor from calling it news (or anything else, for that matter).
Oof, this is painful.
November 24, 2025 at 11:44 PM
Oof, this is painful.
1st Amendment says hi.
November 24, 2025 at 10:57 PM
1st Amendment says hi.
The deterioration of the political landscape is textbook causation v. correlation. Technology did more to change the landscape than the Fairness doctrine's repeal did, and it ain't close.
November 24, 2025 at 10:54 PM
The deterioration of the political landscape is textbook causation v. correlation. Technology did more to change the landscape than the Fairness doctrine's repeal did, and it ain't close.
MSM today would not be impacted at all by the Fairness Doctrine, since fewer people get their information these days from TV and radio as opposed to cable, internet and podcasts.
November 24, 2025 at 10:51 PM
MSM today would not be impacted at all by the Fairness Doctrine, since fewer people get their information these days from TV and radio as opposed to cable, internet and podcasts.
Most lies, both before, during and after the Fairness Doctrine era, are protected by the 1st Amendment.
The Fairness Doctrine did not have anything in it regarding suing stations for lying.
The Fairness Doctrine did not have anything in it regarding suing stations for lying.
November 24, 2025 at 10:48 PM
Most lies, both before, during and after the Fairness Doctrine era, are protected by the 1st Amendment.
The Fairness Doctrine did not have anything in it regarding suing stations for lying.
The Fairness Doctrine did not have anything in it regarding suing stations for lying.
Our mashed-potato-for-brains President doesn't know what an FCC license is nor what entities have them.
November 23, 2025 at 11:54 PM
Our mashed-potato-for-brains President doesn't know what an FCC license is nor what entities have them.
today's FCC / FD takes on this app....
a man in a suit and tie sitting in a chair
ALT: a man in a suit and tie sitting in a chair
media.tenor.com
November 23, 2025 at 8:48 PM
today's FCC / FD takes on this app....
IT NEVER PREVENTED LIES OR REGULATED TRUTH!!!!!
November 23, 2025 at 8:47 PM
IT NEVER PREVENTED LIES OR REGULATED TRUTH!!!!!
Oh good...another fucking stupid meme that misinforms people about the Fairness Doctrine.
November 23, 2025 at 8:46 PM
Oh good...another fucking stupid meme that misinforms people about the Fairness Doctrine.
"I wish the 1st Amendment didn't exist so the government could try to "stomp out" media I don't like!"
November 23, 2025 at 8:45 PM
"I wish the 1st Amendment didn't exist so the government could try to "stomp out" media I don't like!"
All of this is backed up by SCOTUS in the landmark Arbuckle v. Garfield (1983) decision.
November 23, 2025 at 8:44 PM
All of this is backed up by SCOTUS in the landmark Arbuckle v. Garfield (1983) decision.
Reposted by Bad FCC / Fairness Doctrine Takes
ALL YOU PEOPLE CLAMORING FOR A RETURN OF THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE....
READ THIS
www.theguardian.com/media/2025/n...
READ THIS
www.theguardian.com/media/2025/n...
Meet the conservative lawyer causing headaches for major news networks
Critics are concerned that Daniel Suhr, the head of a conservative legal group, may be pulling the strings behind many of the Trump FCC’s moves
www.theguardian.com
November 22, 2025 at 11:52 AM
ALL YOU PEOPLE CLAMORING FOR A RETURN OF THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE....
READ THIS
www.theguardian.com/media/2025/n...
READ THIS
www.theguardian.com/media/2025/n...
Sharing this meme is like taking a gigantic neon arrow that says "I don't understand the subject I'm talking about at all" and pointing it to yourself.
November 23, 2025 at 8:42 PM
Sharing this meme is like taking a gigantic neon arrow that says "I don't understand the subject I'm talking about at all" and pointing it to yourself.
The Fairness Doctrine restricted the spread of conspiracies! 😂 😂 😂 😂
November 23, 2025 at 8:41 PM
The Fairness Doctrine restricted the spread of conspiracies! 😂 😂 😂 😂
I blame that stupid Reagan-Murdoch meme.
November 23, 2025 at 8:38 PM
I blame that stupid Reagan-Murdoch meme.