Ben Van Calster
@benvancalster.bsky.social
730 followers 210 following 35 posts
Medical Statistician at KU Leuven. My brain is like a snail but it gets there in the end (or not).
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Ben Van Calster
awmercer.bsky.social
Expertise is having fucked up in enough different ways that you become able to anticipate it.
benvancalster.bsky.social
We need to think more about communication in this context, that is for sure. Clinical staff should not say "your risk is 21%". Just giving an 95% CI in layman terms does not do the job. The uncertainty complicates things quite a lot imo, not sure how to best tackle that to be honest.
benvancalster.bsky.social
Universities love open science
Small print: unless money is involved
Reposted by Ben Van Calster
deevybee.bsky.social
Huge variability documented in how publishers respond when informed about a problematic body of work by a research group. www.jclinepi.com/article/S089...
#publishers #retractions
Bar chart showing % of articles retracted, with expression of concern, or no action from different publishers. 100% no action from Elsevier and Wolters Kluwer; 100% retraction from Taylor and Francis.
benvancalster.bsky.social
We recently had 5 review reports for a submission. While the comments were reasonable, the 5 reports were all very similar in the issues they raised. Suspicious.
Reposted by Ben Van Calster
benvancalster.bsky.social
You could park many of them in the Journal of Unplanned Interim Analyses.
Reposted by Ben Van Calster
statsepi.bsky.social
Seconded.

Any time someone uses this term, make sure they explain exactly what they mean. If they can't, they are obviously trying to bullshit you.
Reposted by Ben Van Calster
samuelmoore.org
“Volume is a bad driver,” [Sir Mark Walport] said. “The incentive should be quality, not quantity. It’s about re-engineering the system in a way that encourages good research from beginning to end.”

www.theguardian.com/science/2025...
Quality of scientific papers questioned as academics ‘overwhelmed’ by the millions published
Widespread mockery of AI-generated rat with giant penis in one paper brings problem to public attention
www.theguardian.com
benvancalster.bsky.social
Graeme is clearly on to something here!
Reposted by Ben Van Calster
rickihirsch.bsky.social
What is common knowledge in your field, but shocks outsiders?

Data isn't objective and researchers have innumerable ways to put their thumbs on the scale. Many don't understand statistics well enough to realize they're doing it.
aaronsofaer.bsky.social
What is common knowledge in your field, but shocks outsiders?

Almost all of the bugs and problems and breakage in the software you use is known to the engineers, we just aren't allowed to fix it. Gotta ship new features.
margaretadelle.bsky.social
What is common knowledge in your field, but shocks outsiders?

The number of parents that don't care much about their kids and/or have very thinly veiled resentment against them is much higher than most people think.
benvancalster.bsky.social
Yes! Some years ago, The Group of Biomedical Sciences at mu uni said in front of an auditorium with many young and local researchers that they wanted to invest more in superstar transfers and compared it with football transfers.
Reposted by Ben Van Calster
richarddriley.bsky.social
**New Lancet DH paper**

"Importance of sample size on the quality & utility of AI-based prediction models for healthcare"

- for broad audience
- explains why inadequate SS harms #AI model training, evaluation & performance
- pushback to claims SS irrelevant to AI research

👇
tinyurl.com/yrje52fn
Importance of sample size on the quality and utility of AI-based prediction models for healthcare
Rigorous study design and analytical standards are required to generate reliable findings in healthcare from artificial intelligence (AI) research. On…
www.sciencedirect.com
benvancalster.bsky.social
Yes.... somehow they always get it wrong. You cannot get to those levels in science and politics and get it right.
benvancalster.bsky.social
yes, subscription model. Fee calculated based on character count of the main paper, including refs, tables, figs. Sounds a bit odd in this digital age.
benvancalster.bsky.social
I recently had a paper in a journal where the fee for open access was lower than the fee for closed access. Is that common? @grahamkendall.bsky.social
Reposted by Ben Van Calster
oalexanderdk.bsky.social
Why aren’t you wearing a suit?

Have you said “Thank you” to Greenland and Denmark for allowing you to have a base on Greenland?
benvancalster.bsky.social
Great question! It seems that universities would (secretly?) say yes.
Reposted by Ben Van Calster
dingdingpeng.the100.ci
Oh, there's an English version as well! DW reports about misconduct at Max Planck Institutes: www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5nE...
Reposted by Ben Van Calster
lasaibarrenada.bsky.social
I will be presenting our recent work on individual risk estimation uncertainty at ENAR in New Orleans. Come say hi!

Work with @benvancalster.bsky.social @laurewynants.bsky.social #DoranneThomassen #EwoutSteyerberg
benvancalster.bsky.social
Academia says 'no novelty no glory no funding'
benvancalster.bsky.social
Following the footsteps of Bink Marino!
benvancalster.bsky.social
Quousque tandem?
@kuleuvenuniversity.bsky.social @fwovlaanderen.bsky.social
A lot of publications in MDPI journals also in Flanders, despite it being listed on predatoryjournals.org.