Betsey Stevenson
@betseystevenson.bsky.social
7.4K followers 190 following 110 posts
Former Member of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers & Chief Economist at Labor. Current academic economist at Michigan. Always an economist at home.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Betsey Stevenson
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
Don’t believe anyone who tells you that intelligence shows anything “without a doubt,” but even if the intelligence was water-tight, this strike was still murder. No law permits the deliberate, premeditated killing of civilians.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
Cities with violent crime rates higher than DC:
Memphis, Tennessee
Houston, Texas
Nashville, Tennessee
Evansville, Indiana
Peoria, Illinois
Toleda, Ohio
Cleveland, Ohio
St Louis, Missouri
Kansas City, Missouri
Springfield, Missouri
Little Rock, Arkansas
for more:
usafacts.org/articles/how...
Which cities have the highest and lowest crime rates? | USAFacts
Crime rates stayed constant from 2020 to 2021, but national crime data remains incomplete with about 37% of law enforcement agencies not reporting data last year.
usafacts.org
betseystevenson.bsky.social
I understand why Trump wants a command and control economy with him at the center. What is confusing to me is why the entire Republican party is so willing to walk so far from a competitive, market-based economy.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
If the concern was really around accuracy why did the Trump administration dismiss the **uncompensated** Technical Advisory Committee and the Data Users Advisory Committee, which gave guidance on statistical methodology and specialized economic expertise?
betseystevenson.bsky.social
There were 159,539,000 jobs in July. The fears about accuracy refer to the possibility that it was actually 159,439,000 or 159,639,000. Don't get me wrong, I like accurate numbers more than most people, but still: the data is pretty darn good and suspending the data is corrupt.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
One easy way to hide rising unemployment, slowing job growth, and rising prices would be to pause the data release for a few months in the name of "accuracy" and then release it with new definitions a few months later that make it incomparable to the past.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
The Fed can't be dovish or hawkish right now, they have to be doggish--data doggish that is. nytimes.com/2025/07/02/b...
betseystevenson.bsky.social
And I am puzzled why, at the dawn of artificial general intelligence, we are knee-capping ourselves, giving our international competitors a fighting chance at beating us in the AI game.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
What I worry about is whether these tariffs cost us American service jobs--all of the workers involved in business and professional services that support companies that import goods. Fewer goods sold mean fewer business services needed.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
American is a service-based economy: Let's take a look at job growth in private sector goods and services over the past 75 years. Spoiler: it's almost all in services. We are not going to even make a dent in this trend. In fact, we may push it further.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
Tariffs are not going to mean that we have more goods-producing jobs in the US. What they will do is change the relative price of goods versus services, pushing Americans to buy fewer goods relative to services. If you are worried about American overconsumption of stuff, then hooray! 🧵
betseystevenson.bsky.social
The United States GDP per capita is 20 times great than it was at the start of the Guilded Age. And yet so many in power remain just as insensitive, greedy, and detached from the realities of poverty and suffering. Imagine getting that much richer and not using any of it on empathy.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
This fun, creative contest seriously highlights how hard the entire Planet Money team works to communicate economics in a way that both educates and entertains.
planetmoney.bsky.social
Three Planet Money hosts throw down in our latest edition of Econ Battle Zone. Their challenge – to elucidate the fight over the federal budget, while incorporating their mystery ingredients: rhyme, music, and the genre of romantic comedy.

buff.ly/zjhaaYo
npr.org
betseystevenson.bsky.social
The public needs to hear this over and over again: work requirements are not about getting Medicaid recipients to work. It’s about increasing the administrative burdens and costs in the system to push both recipients and the program itself to the breaking point.
donmoyn.bsky.social
This is a crucial point about why work requirements are doomed to fail: they place new administrative burdens not just on the public, but also on state governments, while removing resources.
No reason that people normally skeptical about govt capacity should be confident it can pull this off.
You may say, these are growing pains. But anyone who is ordinarily skeptical of the government should not suspend their powers of reason when it comes to policies that send messages that they like. This bill cuts the resources for states while piling new demands on them: linking data systems, overhauling workflows, rewriting forms, standing up call centers, hiring auditors, managing appeals, and more. And implementation must happen in just 18 months. Baked into H.R. 1’s DNA is a future of failure.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
You might be getting bored of tariff talk but the rubber is going to hit the road in the coming months as price increases hit. Walmart tells investors that it's raising prices later this month. And inflation expectations have shot up a shocking amount in the Michigan consumer survey released today.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
If they really wanted to incentivize work, they would require married stay-at-home moms to work. The second earner effect is their best chance for a work requirement to influence work at all. There is no first earner impact.
donmoyn.bsky.social
This is just not true. The majority view among researchers at this point is that work requirements do not work. There is a reason they do not cite a single study here.
The good news is that history shows us that work requirements work.

In 1996, President Bill Clinton and the speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich, joined forces to enact bipartisan welfare reform with a work requirement at the heart of it. The results were astounding. As early as 1997, economists attributed a measurable increase in the national labor force participation rate and a decrease in dependency to welfare reform. That reform — combined with a strong economy and expanded tax credits for low-income workers — led to a steady decrease in rates of child poverty in the late 1990s. Today, the share of kids living in poverty is a quarter lower than it was in 1996. The 1996 welfare reform was so successful that Barack Obama, when he ran for president in 2008, admitted that he had been wrong about it.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
Walmart might not raise every price by the amount of the tariff, but they aren't going to let their profitability suffer. Their shareholders demand profit maximization and that means passing along tariffs to the fullest extent possible without losing too many sales.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
On @allinwithchris.bsky.social @chrislhayes.bsky.social asked me why tariffs will raise prices if a higher minimum wage doesn't always lead to higher prices.

The answer: People are not things. They respond to a change in their compensation, a sippy cup doesn't.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
On @allinwithchris.bsky.social @chrislhayes.bsky.social asked me why tariffs will raise prices if a higher minimum wage doesn't always lead to higher prices.

The answer: People are not things. They respond to a change in their compensation, a sippy cup doesn't.
Reposted by Betsey Stevenson
justinwolfers.bsky.social
It's true. President Trump is forcing economists to rewrite their textbooks. #TeachEcon @betseystevenson.bsky.social
betseystevenson.bsky.social
And now Walmart is telling us definitely higher prices in June. Just because there aren’t problems in the hard data yet, doesn’t mean that they aren’t forecastably coming.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
My concern is that we'll see a weaker employment report in June and July, of course the labor market was strong in April. That report measured the weak after liberation day and despite the shock of Trump's tariffs, employers aren't going to shed workers that quickly.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
My concern is that we'll see a weaker employment report in June and July, of course the labor market was strong in April. That report measured the weak after liberation day and despite the shock of Trump's tariffs, employers aren't going to shed workers that quickly.
betseystevenson.bsky.social
I didn't post my NBC Fed preview before the press conference. Luckily my preview was exactly what they did and said.