Bob Shull
@bobhasathought.bsky.social
500 followers 190 following 350 posts
Workers' rights, social justice, all that jazz. If I've blocked you despite not knowing you, it's probably because you were aggressively stupid somewhere.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Bob Shull
bachynski.bsky.social
A study of nearly 300,000 people published today in the New England Journal of Medicine found “that last season’s 2024–2025 mRNA COVID vaccines reduced people’s risk of emergency department visits by 29 percent, their risk of hospitalizations by 39 percent and their risk of death by 64 percent.”
Annual COVID Vaccines Save Lives, New Study Shows
A new study shows that receiving an updated COVID vaccine reduced people’s risk of severe disease and death in all age groups, regardless of immunity from prior infection or vaccination
www.scientificamerican.com
Reposted by Bob Shull
aniccia.bsky.social
NHTSA closed their year+ investigation of Waymo. Waymo's 2 recalls re to this investigation were for crashing into a utility pole and roadway barriers. Evidently, robots repeatedly driving on the wrong side of the road into traffic and disobeying traffic control devices is ok in USA. Scale that.
Reposted by Bob Shull
irvinefdn.bsky.social
Older Americans are having to continue working, often without enough retirement savings to step away.

By 2030, more than 1 in 5 U.S. residents will be 65+, underscoring the growing need to advance worker protections and programs for older Americans.

@capitalandmain.bsky.social: bit.ly/4gT3RuI
Too Old to Keep Working, Not Enough Money to Stop
As the senior workforce grows, more older Americans are staying in physically demanding jobs, often risking their health.
bit.ly
Reposted by Bob Shull
democrats-edworkforce.house.gov
In extreme heat, water, rest, and shade aren’t luxuries— they keep workers safe and healthy.

Studies show heat safety rules don’t just prevent illness— they also cut down injuries on the job. t.co/bTA6YxY416
https://www.eenews.net/articles/heat-safety-rules-for-illness-also-reduce-injuries-study-finds/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
t.co
Reposted by Bob Shull
drdavidmichaels.bsky.social
Extreme heat at work strains the body and the mind.

We geocoded 845,000 work injuries reported by employers and found that injury risk increases with heat.

But these injuries are preventable! Risk is lower in the 5 states (CA, CO, MN, OR, WA) with OSHA heat standards. 1/2
tinyurl.com/8x2j66cj
A nationwide analysis of heat and workplace injuries in the United States - Environmental Health
Background Exposure to heat leads to physiological and cognitive impairments that increase the risk of workplace injuries. This study estimates the number and proportion of work injuries reported to the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) that can be attributed to heat exposure. These estimates contribute to the calculation of the benefits of standards, policies, and programs that reduce workplace exposure to extreme heat. Methods We analyzed all 2023 injury cases reported to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application by establishments with 100 or more employees, primarily in high-hazard industries. Each injury was geocoded and matched with high-resolution weather data for the specific injury date. Using a case-crossover design, we compared heat index on each injury day (case) with matched non-injury control days for the same worker. Conditional logistic regression was applied separately for summer-only and year-round periods with a non-linear term for heat index to estimate the odds ratios for injury occurrence. We additionally examined heat-injury patterns by industry sectors and in states with/without workplace heat standards. Results The odds of work injury increased non-linearly with a rising heat index: the pooled national estimate showed a clear upward trend starting around 85°F and accelerating above 90°F. Our results were consistent across nearly all industry sectors, including those that are predominantly indoors. Using a heat index of 80°F as reference, odds ratios (OR) of injuries at or above 90°F, 100°F and 110°F were 1.03 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.02, 1.04), 1.10 (1.07, 1.13), and 1.20 (1.13, 1.26), respectively. At a heat index of 110°F or higher, the odds increased by 22% in states without occupational heat rules (OR=1.22; 1.15,1.29) versus 9% in states with rules (OR=1.09; 0.84, 1.41), suggesting a protective effect, although confidence intervals overlapped. Overall, we estimate 1.18% (95% empirical CI: 0.92%, 1.45%) of all injuries were attributable to heat exposure on days exceeding a heat index of 70°F. Conclusion Heat exposure increases the overall risk of work injury, an effect consistent across nearly all major industries.
tinyurl.com
Reposted by Bob Shull
annamerlan.bsky.social
Let it never again be said that a woman with no real reporting experience who fell for a Twitter account called "Official Antifa" cannot be the head of a huge news organization
Reposted by Bob Shull
deanbaker13.bsky.social
Anyhow, seems it should be possible for Dem politicians to call attention to real gains that they can honestly take credit for while still committing to make things better, as in lower childcare and healthcare costs, and more affordable housing.
bobhasathought.bsky.social
Nothing; he would block you.
Reposted by Bob Shull
Reposted by Bob Shull
lpeproject.bsky.social
"at least a quarter of the investigations originated from people with no relationship to the schools in question. For example, a single right-wing journalist has instigated at least 15 such inquests." 🤯
lpeblog.bsky.social
Today, Darryl Li examines the alarming rise in campus antisemitism investigations—inquests that are often sparked by outside complaints, lack concrete evidence, and lay the groundwork for future crackdowns and grievances.
The Rising Threat of Antisemitism Investigations
In the fall of 2023, the Department of Education launched more antisemitism investigations into colleges and universities than in all previous years combined. This record was surpassed in 2024 and is…
lpeproject.org
Reposted by Bob Shull
nytimes.com
A California jury has found Uber not responsible for the sexual assault that a woman said she experienced during a ride in 2016, an early outcome for the company as it battles thousands of similar lawsuits across the country.
Uber Not Responsible for Sex Assault, Jury Finds, as More Cases Follow
The company is facing similar lawsuits in federal and state courts from people who claim their drivers sexually assaulted or harassed them.
nyti.ms
Reposted by Bob Shull
dropsitenews.com
⚡️Must watch:
Netanyahu reveals to Hebrew audiences after the press event where Trump revealed the 20-point plan to end the war on Gaza, that he has no intention of withdrawing Israeli troops from Gaza – “No way, that’s not happening.”

He said:
“This is a historic visit. Instead of Hamas…
Reposted by Bob Shull
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
For those following along at home, we've now reached the "DOJ is losing unopposed motions at the DC Circuit" level.
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Today in "DOJ gets dinged by a federal court," the DC Circuit just denied DOJ's unopposed motion to reschedule the Nov. 24 oral argument in the AP access case b/c DOJ ignored the DC Circuit rules, under which DOJ should have informed the court about availability issues in July or early August.
ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED NOVEMBER 24, 2025
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
ASSOCIATED PRESS,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
TAYLOR BUDOWICH, et al.,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. 25-5109
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO RESCHEDULE ORAL ARGUMENT
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(b) and D.C.
Circuit Rule 34(g), the government respectfully requests that the Court
reschedule oral argument to avoid a conflict with government counsel's
pre-existing international travel plans. Plaintiff does not oppose the
motion, and the parties are available on any of the following alternative
dates: (1) November 10 or 14; (2) November 17, 18, or 19; (3) December
3, 4, or 5; or (4) December 8, 9, 10, or 11. USCA Case #25-5109
Document #2137523
Filed: 09/29/2025
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Page 1 of 1
No. 25-5109
September Term, 2025
1:25-cv-00532-TNM
Filed On: September 29, 2025 [2137523]
Associated Press,
Appellee
V.
Taylor Budowich, in his official capacity as White House Deputy Chief of Staff, et al.,
Appellants
ORDER
Upon consideration of the government's unopposed motion to reschedule oral argument, it is
ORDERED that the motion be denied. This case remains scheduled for oral argument on November 24, 2025.
Arguing counsel are reminded of their obligation to promptly notify the court of any dates of unavailability to appear for oral argument. The notice should be filed as soon as possible after the briefing schedule issues and updated if a potential scheduling conflict arises later, or if there is any change in availability. See D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures as 49 (2011).
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:
Clifton B. Cislak, Clerk
BY: /s/
Michael C. McGrail
Deputy Clerk ORAL ARGUMENT
A. NOTIFICATION
(See Fed. R. App. P. 34(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(c).)
The Clerk's Office ordinarily gives notice of the date for oral argument after the briefs have been filed.
Generally, the members of the panel of judges who will hear the case are not named in the order setting the date for oral argument. The composition of the merits panel will be posted on the Court's website, usually 30 days before the date of oral argument, and will not be disclosed before that time.
The Clerk's Office does not confer with counsel regarding availability before the calendaring order is released but will take into account any scheduling conflicts identified by arguing counsel. See supra Part X.D. The calendaring order will contain an electronic link to Form 71 - a memorandum that provides important information on the requirements and logistics for oral argument. Subsequently, in the order allocating the amount of argument time, there will be an electronic link to Form 72, which counsel must complete and file no less than 7 days before oral argument, giving the name of the attorney or attorneys who will present the argument to the Court.
B. POSTPONEMENTS
(See Fed. R. App. P. 34(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(g).)
Once a case has been calendared, the Clerk's Office cannot change the argument date, and the Court will not ordinarily reschedule it. Any request to reschedule must be made by motion, which will be presented
49
to a panel of the Court for disposition. The Court disfavors motions to postpone oral argument and will grant them only upon a showing of "extraordinary cause." Unless the panel that grants a motion to postpone argument is prepared to retain the case and hear it outside its normal sitting period, the case will have to be rescheduled for the first available date on the calendar - possibly months later than the original date.
Accordingly, it is in counsel's interest to avoid seeking to postpone argument. D. SCHEDULING CASES FOR ARGUMENT
Most appeals screened by the Legal Division are classified as "Regular Merits" cases. Normally, the Clerk's Office sets a briefing schedule in these cases after all pending motions have been resolved.
Thereafter, the parties are notified by separate order of the date and time of oral argument. Scheduling is done by a computer program, which automatically checks for known recusals and makes certain that the case mix both for a specific date and for that week's sitting is acceptable. As a general rule, once they become ready, cases are calendared in order of age, with the oldest cases set first.
Typically, the argument date will be a minimum of 45 days after briefing is completed. Arguing counsel should advise the Clerk's Office by letter, filed electronically, of any dates counsel will be unavailable to appear for oral argument. The notification should be filed as soon as possible and updated if a potential scheduling conflict later arises or if there is any change in availability. To the extent possible, the Clerk's Office will endeavor to schedule oral argument to avoid conflicts that have been brought to the Court's attention in advance. Counsel will not be notified of the argument date until it is established by Court order.
See infra Part XI. A. Notification, B. Postponements.
Reposted by Bob Shull
jamellebouie.net
yeah they're just murdering random people on these boats
mpaarlberg.bsky.social
I think the Trump admin assumed no one would try to find out who the people on the boats they blew up really were
Reposted by Bob Shull
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
DOGE was a failure because its entire premise was flawed, and, on top of that, the people who ran and implemented it were both arrogant and ignorant.
Reposted by Bob Shull
deanbaker13.bsky.social
losing track of 1,800 people is kind of a big deal. That's more people than Hamas killed on October 7th. We know Noem and her team are pretty damn incompetent, but this is hard to believe.
ndrew.bsky.social
i am seriously begging democrats to bring the same smoke to this story that they brought to jimmy kimmel being indefinitely suspended
lebassett.bsky.social
More than 1800 detainees are missing after the closure of Alligator Alcatraz. Their families and lawyers can’t find them and they’ve vanished from the ICE database. Feels like this should be a much bigger story www.miamiherald.com/news/local/i...
bobhasathought.bsky.social
THAT'S the cover for Last Summer in the Hamptons?!?
Reposted by Bob Shull
propublica.org
📽️ WATCH: Epidemiologist Erin McCanlies spent much of the past 20 years studying how parents’ exposure to toxic chemicals affects the chances that they will have an autistic child.

RFK Jr. cut her entire division — yet promises to identify the causes of autism by September: https://propub.li/4nhXQua
bobhasathought.bsky.social
It's a weird timeline now, that's all I can say.
bobhasathought.bsky.social
Remembering how the Reagan administration worked so hard to ignore the tie between aspirin and Reye's Syndrome. (Not because I was following the news way back then, but because I was one of the kids who was hospitalized and nearly died of Reye's.)
mirandayaver.bsky.social
This is so very dumb and misguided.
Reposted by Bob Shull
mirandayaver.bsky.social
This is so very dumb and misguided.