Robin Smith 🇺🇦
@bobin.uk
UK Labour voter and Private Eye crossword & Fantasy Premier League enjoyer.
Aiming for even fewer Tories in next election 😈.
Less outrage, more facts ⚖️.
#ElectoralReform
#Rejoin 🇪🇺
#RDGUK
#HamsturDay
Aiming for even fewer Tories in next election 😈.
Less outrage, more facts ⚖️.
#ElectoralReform
#Rejoin 🇪🇺
#RDGUK
#HamsturDay
Oh come on that was so long ago now. HIGNIFY alone wouldn't have been enough to sustain his whole career. He was always going to find his way into the limelight.
November 11, 2025 at 5:46 PM
Oh come on that was so long ago now. HIGNIFY alone wouldn't have been enough to sustain his whole career. He was always going to find his way into the limelight.
I actually disagree. If he had no concept then he would be right/wrong 50% of the time. Instead he lies 100% of the time.
November 11, 2025 at 5:44 PM
I actually disagree. If he had no concept then he would be right/wrong 50% of the time. Instead he lies 100% of the time.
That's as good a proof as you could ever hope to find.
November 11, 2025 at 5:42 PM
That's as good a proof as you could ever hope to find.
Oh, not Chelsea London 🙃.
November 11, 2025 at 5:40 PM
Oh, not Chelsea London 🙃.
Oh I am (blocked) by many on here through mass lists of "Trumpists", "racists" and "TERFs".
November 11, 2025 at 5:38 PM
Oh I am (blocked) by many on here through mass lists of "Trumpists", "racists" and "TERFs".
Signs of improvement 👍.
November 11, 2025 at 5:36 PM
Signs of improvement 👍.
"There are also left dominated online arenas where any dissenting voice is banned."
Perfect description of Bluesky.
Perfect description of Bluesky.
November 11, 2025 at 5:31 PM
"There are also left dominated online arenas where any dissenting voice is banned."
Perfect description of Bluesky.
Perfect description of Bluesky.
Lol no I wouldn't agree on that unfortunately going by some of the users on here (and studies). The far-left in particular are at least as intolerant as those on the far-right.
November 11, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Lol no I wouldn't agree on that unfortunately going by some of the users on here (and studies). The far-left in particular are at least as intolerant as those on the far-right.
Agreed it's totally dodgy and invasive.
November 11, 2025 at 11:59 AM
Agreed it's totally dodgy and invasive.
Reposted by Robin Smith 🇺🇦
Yeah, to get age verification you have to interact with this company, which I find totally unacceptable. Why age in this instance should be a factor beats me, I’m in my 80th year and have managed quite well up to now 😡
November 11, 2025 at 11:38 AM
Yeah, to get age verification you have to interact with this company, which I find totally unacceptable. Why age in this instance should be a factor beats me, I’m in my 80th year and have managed quite well up to now 😡
I don't get why he doesn't just abandon it and make a clean break?
Purely ego. He wants to be seen to "win" this now even though it's a losing cause.
Purely ego. He wants to be seen to "win" this now even though it's a losing cause.
November 11, 2025 at 11:56 AM
I don't get why he doesn't just abandon it and make a clean break?
Purely ego. He wants to be seen to "win" this now even though it's a losing cause.
Purely ego. He wants to be seen to "win" this now even though it's a losing cause.
I just don't get why the OSA applies to this. It's obnoxious.
November 11, 2025 at 3:29 AM
I just don't get why the OSA applies to this. It's obnoxious.
Why wouldn't the left-leaning public trust the BBC again if it made changes and demonstrable improvements going forward?
To just pre-decide that it can never be trustworthy again regardless of reality is ironically a Trumpist position.
To just pre-decide that it can never be trustworthy again regardless of reality is ironically a Trumpist position.
November 11, 2025 at 3:24 AM
Why wouldn't the left-leaning public trust the BBC again if it made changes and demonstrable improvements going forward?
To just pre-decide that it can never be trustworthy again regardless of reality is ironically a Trumpist position.
To just pre-decide that it can never be trustworthy again regardless of reality is ironically a Trumpist position.
Reposted by Robin Smith 🇺🇦
Yep. That about sums it up. What did Starmer do when the Daily Mail demonstrably lied about him? Sue them? No. He took it on the chin, as we are all expected to do on this side of the political spectrum. It’s an uneven playing field with one set of rules for them & another for the rest.
November 10, 2025 at 11:11 PM
Yep. That about sums it up. What did Starmer do when the Daily Mail demonstrably lied about him? Sue them? No. He took it on the chin, as we are all expected to do on this side of the political spectrum. It’s an uneven playing field with one set of rules for them & another for the rest.
I read that article and honestly have no idea what any of it means lol. However if I had given money to these charlatans the impression I would have would be that I had made a mistake!!
How do these fools have no self-awareness at all?? If they had any they would abandon the entire thing.
How do these fools have no self-awareness at all?? If they had any they would abandon the entire thing.
November 10, 2025 at 11:44 PM
I read that article and honestly have no idea what any of it means lol. However if I had given money to these charlatans the impression I would have would be that I had made a mistake!!
How do these fools have no self-awareness at all?? If they had any they would abandon the entire thing.
How do these fools have no self-awareness at all?? If they had any they would abandon the entire thing.
You needn't wait.
Starmer has put the Government behind the BBC, describing it as an "internationally renowned" institution. It rejected allegations that the broadcasting service is "institutionally biased" and said it is important the BBC acts to maintain trust.
www.mirror.co.uk/news/politic...
www.mirror.co.uk/news/politic...
Donald Trump 'corrupt' BBC claim rejected by Keir Starmer in latest twist
Downing Street threw its weight behind the BBC and rejected allegations that the broadcasting service is 'institutionally biased' after a major row over Donald Trump's speech
www.mirror.co.uk
November 10, 2025 at 11:21 PM
You needn't wait.