soooooo good

There ought to be a “No AI” emoji. I’d use that everywhere.

You have chosen . . . wisely.

You don't. You manipulate the stock price while relying on a class of gullible, short-attention-span, amnesiac, true-believer QElon investors addicted to hopiates.

Oh my kingdom for—just ONCE, even—Musk being held accountable for his handwaving babble about how everyone's going to want to buy multiple Tesla cars to start their own personal fleets of robotaxis, and they'll be RICH, bla bla bla. He always quiets down about it, then pulls an "ooh! squirrel!"....

Wait, you're an editor at WIRED? Why make a stink about this?

Who cares if they're not the same exact photo. Same time/place is the point.

The deception argument stands. This image is deceptive. It's not an "Epstein" picture, and has no business being in the DOJ's so-called "Epstein library."

Oh me neither. The FSD thing was absurd from the get-go. I remember thinking in 2016 that there is no way the chips will be fast & cheap enough to do FSD in-car for years to come, despite Musk’s lies (er, promises, 😉).

(Even if FSD worked right now, I hate it and would never use it)

In the US, "heritage" is always code for ignorant bigotry.

Especially considering he utterly betrayed shareholders and customers by abandoning the EV business as the company's focus, deludedly pivoting to AI/robotics crap, which will in the end ruin Tesla.

The only "abundance" at Tesla? Stupidity.

Over 100 Democrats said yes to a Venezuela war?
Let me guess: all captured by oil/gas lobby?

More commercials?

Adam, face it: they *want* billions to die. They figure it'll mostly be undesirables, which will boost their superior race. Meanwhile, they sit back, continue to hold onto their capture of nations, and rack in trillions in profits from continued production, sales, and combustion of fossil fuels.

January 6 coup continues.

It’s all the same thing.

Every time I see the tuxedo I think of They Live

I don’t get the point of fake-redacting Trump photos, other than sparing the public of having to look at the ugly face of the lavvy-heided, orange-makeup shitgibbon numpty fraud, which, hmm, is quite nice.

Hmm. This should be the norm. News media: always black out Trump’s face in news article pics.

Sad there isn’t a Snowden 2.0 within DOJ.

Did it work? For how long? Citing “LLM” as the sole tech triggering disqualification seems hugely short-sighted, like a movie award in 1980s banning all motion pictures made on videotape, when the digital freight train is coming ‘round the bend.

LLM tech is not forever. Something will replace it.