Björn Siepe
@bsiepe.bsky.social
830 followers 380 following 81 posts
PhD Student in Psychological Methods (University of Marburg) Interested in time series, simulation studies & open science https://bsiepe.github.io
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
bsiepe.bsky.social
Simulation studies are essential for methods research. How well are they conducted & reported? How can we improve their quality? Out now in Psychological Methods, see 🧵 below.
With @fbartos.bsky.social, @timpmorris.bsky.social, @boulesteixlaure.bsky.social, @danielheck.bsky.social & Samuel Pawel
bsiepe.bsky.social
We reviewed 100 psych. simulation studies & find room for improvement in planning/reporting. As a remedy, we (František Bartoš, @timpmorris.bsky.social Anne-Laure Boulesteix, @danielheck.bsky.social & Samuel Pawel) present ADEMP-PreReg, a simulation study preregistration & reporting template 🧵/1
Reposted by Björn Siepe
leonievogelsmeier.bsky.social
🚨 New preprint: We compared 13 methods for detecting momentary careless responding in the WARN-D data (206k+ obs.). Tutorials guide you through each method. The takeaway? Diverging results, inherent subjectivity (to varying degrees), and a clear need for further validation.
osf.io/preprints/ps...
OSF
osf.io
Reposted by Björn Siepe
jmbh.bsky.social
Two new preprints on multilevel HMMs! Time series data is now pervasive in psychology and new methods are needed to model the dynamics in such data. Hidden Markov Models (HHMs) are powerful models for dynamics in which a system is switching between a number of discrete states.
Reposted by Björn Siepe
jkflake.bsky.social
Help us show there is support for offering registered reports at one of Psychology's leading method's journal! chng.it/TwwnVBScVb
Adopt Registered Reports at Psychological Methods
Can you spare a minute to help this campaign?
chng.it
Reposted by Björn Siepe
fbartos.bsky.social
Fair coins tend to land on the same side they started: evidence from 350,757 flips.

That's the title of our paper summarizing ~650 hours of coin-tossing experimentation just published in the Journal of the American Statistical Association.
doi.org/10.1080/0162...
Reposted by Björn Siepe
bsiepe.bsky.social
Sure! Thanks for that.
bsiepe.bsky.social
I'm excited that our preregistration template for simulation studies is now available on OSF!
See below for a brief interview with the Center for Open Science about the template and why we created it..
bsiepe.bsky.social
I'm very happy to see meta-science on methods research getting more attention in the form of a great new call for papers!

I recently gave some talks on the existing literature on the quality and transparency of sim studies & ideas for future improvement. Slides: bsiepe.github.io/talks/2025-0...
Reposted by Björn Siepe
anabelbuechner.bsky.social
Self-control in daily life is more than willpower — but how well do commonly used trait scales capture this recent, broader view on self-control?

New preprint with @kaihorstmann.bsky.social & @mhennecke.bsky.social: osf.io/preprints/ps...
Short summary below.
OSF
osf.io
Reposted by Björn Siepe
danielheck.bsky.social
🚀Postdoc position @unimarburg.bsky.social in the project:

"Bridging the Gap Between Verbal Psychological Theories & Formal Statistical Modeling with Large Language Models"
(funded by @volkswagenstiftung.de)

📅Start: 01.10.2025 | ⏳4 years
🔗 Apply now: uni-marburg.de/jhbCen
🔄 Thanks for sharing!
Postdoc
uni-marburg.de
Reposted by Björn Siepe
danielheck.bsky.social
🚀 PhD Position in Psychological Methods at @unimarburg.bsky.social
📅 Start: 01.10.2025 | 💼 50% TV-H E13 | ⏳ 3 years

Focus on statistical modeling—Bayesian statistics, cognitive modeling, psychometrics.

🔗 Apply now: uni-marburg.de/r5dKTr

🔄 Thanks for sharing!
bsiepe.bsky.social
Here's a recent methods paper on casual effects if (micro-)randomized interventions in EMA: psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/...
APA PsycNet
psycnet.apa.org
bsiepe.bsky.social
Thanks to the great Marburg-Groningen team: @matzekloft.bsky.social, @yongzhangzzz.bsky.social, @fridtjofptrsn.bsky.social, @bringmannlaura.bsky.social, @danielheck.bsky.social

💻The sim was preregistered, all code + Docker container to reproduce main results available on OSF
bsiepe.bsky.social
Main takeaways:
▶️Using features of dynamic networks may often come with considerable statistical hurdles
▶️Proper uncertainty quantification is important
▶️We hope that our new implementation of a Bayesian one-step mlVAR model helps
bsiepe.bsky.social
Limitations:
▶️Our simulation was computationally intensive, and we used one main data-generating process, limiting generalizability. However, we think that our data-generating process is realistic and provides somewhat ideal conditions
▶️Estimating BmlVAR can be time-consuming
bsiepe.bsky.social
We highlight some advantages of a Bayesian multilevel approach:
▶️We can estimate the probability of a node being the most central node
▶️For some individuals, there may be a clearly "most central" node, whereas this is very unclear for others
▶️This information is crucial for practical applications
A plot illustrating the posterior distribution for outstrength centrality of 6 items for two participants in our empirical example. The plot indicates that for one participant (65), "depressed" has the highest point estimate of outstrength and a very high posterior probability for being the most central node, whereas this is very uncertain for another participant (92) with the same most central node.
bsiepe.bsky.social
Simulation study w/ different estimation methods shows:
▶️Treatment selection: Identifying the most central node is often difficult
▶️Outcome prediction: Using centrality for outcome prediction requires large n & t & large effects
▶️Using a one-step model such as BmlVAR can help under some conditions
A plot indicating the proportion of correctly identified most central nodes (for outstrength centrality), split in four plots in a grid for the temporal and contemporaneous network with different sample sizes and number of time points for four different methods (GVAR, GIMME, mlVAR, BmlVAR).