Chris Abbott
@c-abbs.bsky.social
48 followers 130 following 10 posts
(Political) Economist at UFCW Canada. Previously at Queen’s University (Comparative & Canadian Political Economy, Growth Models)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Chris Abbott
aburass.bsky.social
My latest academic article - two years in the making - is finally out.

It explores why some ethnic minority groups can build alliances with majorities in divided societies - and others can’t. Here’s the gist in 8 posts 👇
c-abbs.bsky.social
As an important aside: Canada's renewed dependence on oil & gas since the 2000s commodity boom highlights a long-standing vulnerability that doesn't get enough attention - the "staples trap."

Anyways, shout out to @adamtooze.bsky.social & Cam for giving Canadian political economy some attention.
c-abbs.bsky.social
3) Stock market. Another reason oil & gas feels so central: the TSX (world's largest exchange by # of oil & gas issuers) is highly exposed to energy. Energy is the 2nd largest sector on the TSX after financials, with an adjusted market cap weighting of ~19%.
c-abbs.bsky.social
2) Trade. This figure shows the importance of oil and gas exports: while industrial & manufactured goods slipped into deeper trade deficits, oil and gas trade surpluses expanded dramatically, which has been responsible for sustaining Canada's overall trade balance.
c-abbs.bsky.social
1) Investment. If we decompose GDP growth since early 2000s, growth (&stagnation) in Canada is tied pretty closely to trends in fixed non-residential capital investment - more so than its peers. Breaking this down by industry, oil and gas stands out as the primary driver.
c-abbs.bsky.social
He notes the seemingly disproportionate political influence of oil & gas relative to its share of GDP - which he correctly identifies as small. But this misses other major indicators of its economic significance: 1) contribution to investment, 2) contribution to trade, 3) stock market influence.
c-abbs.bsky.social
Good @onesandtooze.bsky.social episode on Canada that flagged key aspects of Canada's political economy: importance of housing market, economic geography, continentalism, federalism. @adamtooze.bsky.social did make one mistake I've also made before regarding the oil and gas sector...
c-abbs.bsky.social
In "Canadian Productivity Growth: Stuck in the Oil Sands," the authors conduct a growth accounting decomposition of Cdn economy and find that productivity stagnation disappears when the oil sector is excluded, putting TFP growth on par with the US since 2001.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Canadian productivity growth: Stuck in the oil sands
We study the behaviour of Canadian Total Factor Productivity (TFP) growth over the past 60 years. We find that the observed stagnation during the last 20 years is accounted for entirely by the oil se....
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
c-abbs.bsky.social
Finally. The obsession with internal trade barriers as the root of Canada’s economic woes—esp. productivity stagnation—is misleading.

Now, if everyone could shift their attention to some key research by Loertscher & @paupujolas.bsky.social in the Canadian Journal of Economics...
Reposted by Chris Abbott
justinwolfers.bsky.social
This is what happens when you ask me to help sanewash the Trump tariffs.
c-abbs.bsky.social
Easily the most sensible, if brief, take on Trudeau’s legacy amid a flood of uninformed opinions.
emmettmacfarlane.com
I think in a lot of ways the Trudeau Liberals mirrored the Harper Conservatives in that (contrary to Andrew's claim here) the government entered in 2015 with plenty of substance and got quite a few things done, but this waned dramatically over time, and its final two years was awash in listlessness.
nationalnewswatch.com
The great pretender: Looking back at Trudeau, we see our initial judgment of him when he first entered politics was correct, @acoyne.bsky.social writes. www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/arti...

Find out more at Nationalnewswatch.com