Chirine H.
@chirine.bsky.social
My posts are about jurisprudence ⚖️, legal articles 📃 and quotes 💬
📌Stratas JA' latest in Jennings-Clyde v AGC is a gem: clear, practical, punchy.
📌CRA offered inadequate reasons, zero statutory analysis, citing unraised precedent without taxpayer input.
📌Key: Admin decisions impacting rights MUST be properly explained.
<canlii.ca/t/kh1mk>
📌CRA offered inadequate reasons, zero statutory analysis, citing unraised precedent without taxpayer input.
📌Key: Admin decisions impacting rights MUST be properly explained.
<canlii.ca/t/kh1mk>
December 16, 2025 at 11:35 PM
📌Stratas JA' latest in Jennings-Clyde v AGC is a gem: clear, practical, punchy.
📌CRA offered inadequate reasons, zero statutory analysis, citing unraised precedent without taxpayer input.
📌Key: Admin decisions impacting rights MUST be properly explained.
<canlii.ca/t/kh1mk>
📌CRA offered inadequate reasons, zero statutory analysis, citing unraised precedent without taxpayer input.
📌Key: Admin decisions impacting rights MUST be properly explained.
<canlii.ca/t/kh1mk>
Important read on the ON Superior Court's use of expert evidence to assess trust validity in Resendes v. Maciel.
Key topics: Admissibility of expert testimony on trusts, sham trusts, red flags indicating a sham, and the importance of contextual analysis.
hullandhull.com/2025/11/supe...
Key topics: Admissibility of expert testimony on trusts, sham trusts, red flags indicating a sham, and the importance of contextual analysis.
hullandhull.com/2025/11/supe...
December 13, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Important read on the ON Superior Court's use of expert evidence to assess trust validity in Resendes v. Maciel.
Key topics: Admissibility of expert testimony on trusts, sham trusts, red flags indicating a sham, and the importance of contextual analysis.
hullandhull.com/2025/11/supe...
Key topics: Admissibility of expert testimony on trusts, sham trusts, red flags indicating a sham, and the importance of contextual analysis.
hullandhull.com/2025/11/supe...
"The McDaniel case is a stark reminder that a “simple will” drafted years ago may no longer reflect your life,values, or the needs of those you love.Wills and estate plans aren’t mere paperwork;they carry profound emotional and financial consequences."
hullandhull.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?...
hullandhull.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?...
December 13, 2025 at 2:47 PM
"The McDaniel case is a stark reminder that a “simple will” drafted years ago may no longer reflect your life,values, or the needs of those you love.Wills and estate plans aren’t mere paperwork;they carry profound emotional and financial consequences."
hullandhull.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?...
hullandhull.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?...
No Power of Attorney + can't manage finances due to incapacity?
Ontario court can appoint a guardian under the Substitute Decisions Act to protect the person & their assets.
Strict legal duties apply.
hullandhull.com/2025/12/duti...
Ontario court can appoint a guardian under the Substitute Decisions Act to protect the person & their assets.
Strict legal duties apply.
hullandhull.com/2025/12/duti...
December 13, 2025 at 3:27 AM
No Power of Attorney + can't manage finances due to incapacity?
Ontario court can appoint a guardian under the Substitute Decisions Act to protect the person & their assets.
Strict legal duties apply.
hullandhull.com/2025/12/duti...
Ontario court can appoint a guardian under the Substitute Decisions Act to protect the person & their assets.
Strict legal duties apply.
hullandhull.com/2025/12/duti...
When it comes to will challenges, claims must be backed by evidence. The decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Mitten (Peterson) v Peterson, 2025 ONSC 6082, reinforces this point while offering practical guidance for self-represented litigant
hullandhull.com/2025/12/evid...
hullandhull.com/2025/12/evid...
December 10, 2025 at 11:41 AM
When it comes to will challenges, claims must be backed by evidence. The decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Mitten (Peterson) v Peterson, 2025 ONSC 6082, reinforces this point while offering practical guidance for self-represented litigant
hullandhull.com/2025/12/evid...
hullandhull.com/2025/12/evid...
Mark Debono reviews Ontario jurisprudence relating to foreign real property in estate litigation, noting that in personam jurisdiction may still be exercised if specific criteria are met.
hullandhull.com/2025/11/in-p...
hullandhull.com/2025/11/in-p...
December 8, 2025 at 11:47 AM
Mark Debono reviews Ontario jurisprudence relating to foreign real property in estate litigation, noting that in personam jurisdiction may still be exercised if specific criteria are met.
hullandhull.com/2025/11/in-p...
hullandhull.com/2025/11/in-p...
📃🖋️Estate Planning & Title Insurance: Protecting Real Property Gifted Through Wills and Trusts
🔹By Ian Hull
Whether land is being given as a testamentary gift or put into a trust, title insurance remains essential to safeguarding ownership rights.
hullandhull.com/2025/12/esta...
🔹By Ian Hull
Whether land is being given as a testamentary gift or put into a trust, title insurance remains essential to safeguarding ownership rights.
hullandhull.com/2025/12/esta...
December 3, 2025 at 11:49 AM
📃🖋️Estate Planning & Title Insurance: Protecting Real Property Gifted Through Wills and Trusts
🔹By Ian Hull
Whether land is being given as a testamentary gift or put into a trust, title insurance remains essential to safeguarding ownership rights.
hullandhull.com/2025/12/esta...
🔹By Ian Hull
Whether land is being given as a testamentary gift or put into a trust, title insurance remains essential to safeguarding ownership rights.
hullandhull.com/2025/12/esta...
Joint bank accounts & estate disputes: The often overlooked paragraph in Pecore reminds us that the nature of the relationship between the deceased and the surviving holder is powerful evidence when deciding if a gift was intended. A must-read for estate litigators.
hullandhull.com/2025/11/the-...
hullandhull.com/2025/11/the-...
December 2, 2025 at 1:57 AM
Joint bank accounts & estate disputes: The often overlooked paragraph in Pecore reminds us that the nature of the relationship between the deceased and the surviving holder is powerful evidence when deciding if a gift was intended. A must-read for estate litigators.
hullandhull.com/2025/11/the-...
hullandhull.com/2025/11/the-...
Legislation to formally repeal the Canadian DST introduced
"Businesses affected by Canada’s Digital Services Tax (DST) may finally see long-awaited relief. Newly tabled Bill C-15 would formally repeal the DST and require refunds of amounts already paid."
gowlingwlg.com/en-ca/insigh...
"Businesses affected by Canada’s Digital Services Tax (DST) may finally see long-awaited relief. Newly tabled Bill C-15 would formally repeal the DST and require refunds of amounts already paid."
gowlingwlg.com/en-ca/insigh...
December 2, 2025 at 1:49 AM
Legislation to formally repeal the Canadian DST introduced
"Businesses affected by Canada’s Digital Services Tax (DST) may finally see long-awaited relief. Newly tabled Bill C-15 would formally repeal the DST and require refunds of amounts already paid."
gowlingwlg.com/en-ca/insigh...
"Businesses affected by Canada’s Digital Services Tax (DST) may finally see long-awaited relief. Newly tabled Bill C-15 would formally repeal the DST and require refunds of amounts already paid."
gowlingwlg.com/en-ca/insigh...
Rule 24.01 lets courts toss lawsuits for delay, but there is NO equivalent power to dismiss an Application for delay–Courts have repeatedly held that Rule 24.01 doesn’t apply to such proceedings.
Delay remains fatal, but the legal test is far less certain
hullandhull.com/2025/12/dism...
Delay remains fatal, but the legal test is far less certain
hullandhull.com/2025/12/dism...
December 1, 2025 at 11:42 PM
Rule 24.01 lets courts toss lawsuits for delay, but there is NO equivalent power to dismiss an Application for delay–Courts have repeatedly held that Rule 24.01 doesn’t apply to such proceedings.
Delay remains fatal, but the legal test is far less certain
hullandhull.com/2025/12/dism...
Delay remains fatal, but the legal test is far less certain
hullandhull.com/2025/12/dism...
Two Ontario Divisional Court judges got the exact same motion in writing.
Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(3/3)
Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(3/3)
December 1, 2025 at 11:19 PM
Two Ontario Divisional Court judges got the exact same motion in writing.
Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(3/3)
Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(3/3)
Two Ontario Divisional Court judges got the exact same motion in writing.
Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(2/3)
Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(2/3)
December 1, 2025 at 11:19 PM
Two Ontario Divisional Court judges got the exact same motion in writing.
Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(2/3)
Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(2/3)
Two Ontario Divisional Court judges got the exact same motion in writing.
Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(1/3)
Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(1/3)
December 1, 2025 at 11:19 PM
Two Ontario Divisional Court judges got the exact same motion in writing.
Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(1/3)
Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(1/3)
Mayers v Wawanesa(2025) Applicant wins Catastrophic Impairment (Criterion 8) case. Adjudicator preferred detailed, consistent reports of Dr.Gavett-Liu+treating OTs showing marked impairment in ADL, social functioning & adaptation over insurer IEs. Strong new authority for SABS Criterion 8 cases.
4/4
4/4
December 1, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Mayers v Wawanesa(2025) Applicant wins Catastrophic Impairment (Criterion 8) case. Adjudicator preferred detailed, consistent reports of Dr.Gavett-Liu+treating OTs showing marked impairment in ADL, social functioning & adaptation over insurer IEs. Strong new authority for SABS Criterion 8 cases.
4/4
4/4
Mayers v Wawanesa(2025) Applicant wins Catastrophic Impairment (Criterion 8) case. Adjudicator preferred detailed, consistent reports of Dr.Gavett-Liu+treating OTs showing marked impairment in ADL, social functioning & adaptation over insurer IEs. Strong new authority for SABS Criterion 8 cases.
3/4
3/4
December 1, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Mayers v Wawanesa(2025) Applicant wins Catastrophic Impairment (Criterion 8) case. Adjudicator preferred detailed, consistent reports of Dr.Gavett-Liu+treating OTs showing marked impairment in ADL, social functioning & adaptation over insurer IEs. Strong new authority for SABS Criterion 8 cases.
3/4
3/4
Mayers v Wawanesa(2025) Applicant wins Catastrophic Impairment (Criterion 8) case. Adjudicator preferred detailed, consistent reports of Dr.Gavett-Liu+treating OTs showing marked impairment in ADL, social functioning & adaptation over insurer IEs. Strong new authority for SABS Criterion 8 cases.
2/4
2/4
December 1, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Mayers v Wawanesa(2025) Applicant wins Catastrophic Impairment (Criterion 8) case. Adjudicator preferred detailed, consistent reports of Dr.Gavett-Liu+treating OTs showing marked impairment in ADL, social functioning & adaptation over insurer IEs. Strong new authority for SABS Criterion 8 cases.
2/4
2/4
Mayers v Wawanesa(2025) Applicant wins Catastrophic Impairment (Criterion 8) case. Adjudicator preferred detailed, consistent reports of Dr.Gavett-Liu+treating OTs showing marked impairment in ADL, social functioning & adaptation over insurer IEs. Strong new authority for SABS Criterion 8 cases.
1/4
1/4
December 1, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Mayers v Wawanesa(2025) Applicant wins Catastrophic Impairment (Criterion 8) case. Adjudicator preferred detailed, consistent reports of Dr.Gavett-Liu+treating OTs showing marked impairment in ADL, social functioning & adaptation over insurer IEs. Strong new authority for SABS Criterion 8 cases.
1/4
1/4
In Haddock v. Haddock (2025 ONSC 6287), the Court upheld testator’s intent for equal treatment despite massive asset growth since the will was written.
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(3/3)
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(3/3)
December 1, 2025 at 9:22 PM
In Haddock v. Haddock (2025 ONSC 6287), the Court upheld testator’s intent for equal treatment despite massive asset growth since the will was written.
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(3/3)
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(3/3)
In Haddock v. Haddock (2025 ONSC 6287), the Court upheld testator’s intent for equal treatment despite massive asset growth since the will was written.
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(2/3)
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(2/3)
December 1, 2025 at 9:22 PM
In Haddock v. Haddock (2025 ONSC 6287), the Court upheld testator’s intent for equal treatment despite massive asset growth since the will was written.
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(2/3)
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(2/3)
In Haddock v. Haddock (2025 ONSC 6287), the Court upheld testator’s intent for equal treatment despite massive asset growth since the will was written.
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(1/3)
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(1/3)
December 1, 2025 at 9:22 PM
In Haddock v. Haddock (2025 ONSC 6287), the Court upheld testator’s intent for equal treatment despite massive asset growth since the will was written.
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(1/3)
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(1/3)
Late medical records arriving close to your LAT hearing? 🏥⏰
In Bennie v. Belair (2025 ONLAT 24-003062/AABS), the Tribunal allowed late production after weighing prejudice to both sides, a great reminder that fairness can still trump strict timelines.
Add this decision to your book of authorities
2/2
In Bennie v. Belair (2025 ONLAT 24-003062/AABS), the Tribunal allowed late production after weighing prejudice to both sides, a great reminder that fairness can still trump strict timelines.
Add this decision to your book of authorities
2/2
December 1, 2025 at 6:14 PM
Late medical records arriving close to your LAT hearing? 🏥⏰
In Bennie v. Belair (2025 ONLAT 24-003062/AABS), the Tribunal allowed late production after weighing prejudice to both sides, a great reminder that fairness can still trump strict timelines.
Add this decision to your book of authorities
2/2
In Bennie v. Belair (2025 ONLAT 24-003062/AABS), the Tribunal allowed late production after weighing prejudice to both sides, a great reminder that fairness can still trump strict timelines.
Add this decision to your book of authorities
2/2
Late medical records arriving close to your LAT hearing? 🏥⏰
In Bennie v. Belair (2025 ONLAT 24-003062/AABS), the Tribunal allowed late production after weighing prejudice to both sides, a great reminder that fairness can still trump strict timelines.
Add this decision to your book of authorities
1/2
In Bennie v. Belair (2025 ONLAT 24-003062/AABS), the Tribunal allowed late production after weighing prejudice to both sides, a great reminder that fairness can still trump strict timelines.
Add this decision to your book of authorities
1/2
December 1, 2025 at 6:14 PM
Late medical records arriving close to your LAT hearing? 🏥⏰
In Bennie v. Belair (2025 ONLAT 24-003062/AABS), the Tribunal allowed late production after weighing prejudice to both sides, a great reminder that fairness can still trump strict timelines.
Add this decision to your book of authorities
1/2
In Bennie v. Belair (2025 ONLAT 24-003062/AABS), the Tribunal allowed late production after weighing prejudice to both sides, a great reminder that fairness can still trump strict timelines.
Add this decision to your book of authorities
1/2
When a Guardian Cannot be Reached: Using Rule 16.04 to Dispense with Service Requirements when Seeking the Removal of a Guardian of Property in Ontario
By Mark Debono | November 25, 2025 | 3 minutes of reading
hullandhull.com/2025/11/when...
By Mark Debono | November 25, 2025 | 3 minutes of reading
hullandhull.com/2025/11/when...
December 1, 2025 at 5:50 PM
When a Guardian Cannot be Reached: Using Rule 16.04 to Dispense with Service Requirements when Seeking the Removal of a Guardian of Property in Ontario
By Mark Debono | November 25, 2025 | 3 minutes of reading
hullandhull.com/2025/11/when...
By Mark Debono | November 25, 2025 | 3 minutes of reading
hullandhull.com/2025/11/when...
"The Taxpayer Bill of Rights sets out fundamental rights and obligations that guide the CRA’s relationship with Canadians, emphasizing complete, accurate, clear, and timely information. The OAG findings show these principles are not being met in practice."
gowlingwlg.com/en-ca/insigh...
gowlingwlg.com/en-ca/insigh...
November 30, 2025 at 10:21 PM
"The Taxpayer Bill of Rights sets out fundamental rights and obligations that guide the CRA’s relationship with Canadians, emphasizing complete, accurate, clear, and timely information. The OAG findings show these principles are not being met in practice."
gowlingwlg.com/en-ca/insigh...
gowlingwlg.com/en-ca/insigh...
