Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(3/3)
Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(3/3)
Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(2/3)
Nov 20: Justice Shore dismisses it.
Nov 21: Justice Nakatsuru grants it.
Same facts, same law, opposite results 24 hours apart.
This is why mediation should be mandatory and why no case is ever a “slam dunk.”
(2/3)
4/4
4/4
3/4
3/4
2/4
2/4
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(3/3)
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(3/3)
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(2/3)
A timely reminder as AI & online Wills explode: clear drafting + regular reviews are critical when values can skyrocket.
(2/3)
In Bennie v. Belair (2025 ONLAT 24-003062/AABS), the Tribunal allowed late production after weighing prejudice to both sides, a great reminder that fairness can still trump strict timelines.
Add this decision to your book of authorities
2/2
In Bennie v. Belair (2025 ONLAT 24-003062/AABS), the Tribunal allowed late production after weighing prejudice to both sides, a great reminder that fairness can still trump strict timelines.
Add this decision to your book of authorities
2/2