Because:
1) it is declared
2) the research was quite good (have you read it?)

Me in my 20s: people have a lot of motives and there's nuance to everything

Me in my 40s: oh a lot of people are just evil actually

It’s covered in the article as well.

Try reading before judging.

The man’s name is in the first sentence of the article. His heroism is outlined throughout the rest of the article.

A headline is just a headline.

With 4m guns in 🇦🇺 the shift to the individual has gone too far. There is no need for private guns in cities, only wants of individuals. Obviously the number of guns needs reducing to meet community safety. Another buy back scheme 2/

Absolutely, but it's also just ridiculously ironic that the tech that makes it possible to have instant access to all the reading material you could ever want should be wholly given over to one-at-a-time talking heads with no place for hypertext.

WTF was the internet for? 5 billion cable channels?

Bad for science in the USA, not globally.

Howard would be respected more if he publicly spoke less.

Groupthink is communistic.
😜

Given Trump is the first and only winner, you can make the argument that this is the exact standard FIFA is seeking to establish…

He’s likely to kill more Republicans than Democrats or Independents.

No death is good, but when individuals die due to their stubborn refusal to consider evidence over misinformation - it does improve the species.

Ahem… it depends how recent the report is
www.consumerreports.org/cars/car-rel...

Trump was just as much of a bully before he was President.

You just didn’t pay him as much attention.