David Tuller
@davetuller1.bsky.social
2.2K followers 370 following 200 posts
Senior Fellow in Public Health and Journalism, Center for Global Public Health at the University of California, Berkeley. I blog at Virology Blog (virology.ws). My academic position is largely funded by donations from patients. [email protected]
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
davetuller1.bsky.social
Berkeley's crowdfunder has reached 5% of the goal after its first day, with 49 donors! This pace won't keep up, but it's a decent start. Thanks to all past, current and future supporters!
crowdfund.berkeley.edu/project/47768
David Tuller's Trial by Error Fall 2025
Help UC Berkeley raise $68,000 for the project: David Tuller's Trial by Error Fall 2025. Your gift will make a difference!
crowdfund.berkeley.edu
davetuller1.bsky.social
I spoke last week with Yale immunologist Akiko Iwasaki about her work on Long COVID. This interview has more than 1.3K views so far:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJTa...
Interview with Yale immunologist Akiko Iwasaki
YouTube video by David M Tuller
www.youtube.com
davetuller1.bsky.social
Brian, they can't help themselves. It's such a deep-rooted instinct.
davetuller1.bsky.social
Dr Ian Lipkin: "There's no question that threshold for triggering inflammation with ME/CFS is lower than the threshold in people who are healthy. So anything can set this off."

www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_ih...
Interview with Ian Lipkin
YouTube video by David M Tuller
www.youtube.com
Reposted by David Tuller
swastrosarah.bsky.social
Nowhere near discharge yet but having such a large meeting recognise the limited NHS resources available to clinicians & patients was a better starting point than yet a-n-other re-run of an argument lost in 2021, with PFD report and responses from 6 national bodies as evidence of the risks being run
Reposted by David Tuller
swastrosarah.bsky.social
#Savannah #vsME update. A good MDT which ran over to twice the length of time allocated. Dr Weir and I were both invited, spoke at length and were heard. The absence of NHS ME specialists _anywhere_ in the UK is the biggest probem for every ICB, including Lewisham and Greenwich.
Reposted by David Tuller
georgemonbiot.bsky.social
If Farage wins the next election, it will be down to one person. His name is Keir Starmer.
This thread explains why.
1. Destroying faith in democracy. The UK decisively voted out the Tories, only for Starmer to give us a Continuity Tory government, shamefully beholden to economic power.
🧵
davetuller1.bsky.social
They mention PEM in the discussion or limitations section, but it's irrelevant in the context of the trials in the meta-analysis, which are all over the place in defining their populations but did not generally seem to be identifying people with PEM.
davetuller1.bsky.social
Thanks for helping me do it!!!
davetuller1.bsky.social
I really enjoyed our two-step show that day!!! It happened just as Trump was starting to dismantle the research enterprise in the U.S.
davetuller1.bsky.social
well, thanks--I did what I could.
davetuller1.bsky.social
In a meta-analysis of Long COVID interventions, most RCTs included were at high risk of bias and the quality of evidence for outcomes measured was overwhelmingly of low or very-low quality. Yet authors claim "high-certainty" evidence for exercise interventions. Huh??
virology.ws/2025/08/16/t...
Trial By Error: Lancet Paper Claims "Exercise" Should be "Prioritized" in Long COVID Rehabilitation | Virology Blog
By David Tuller, DrPH Added: On X, @mecfsskeptic has posted a very useful thread explaining how loosely the investigators applied the meaning of "Long ...
virology.ws
davetuller1.bsky.social
thanks. I'll check that out.
davetuller1.bsky.social
Apparently Paul Glasziou has blocked me because I pointed out he was promoting a meta-analysis in which the vast majority of clinical trials were at high risk of bias and 84% of the outcomes were of low or very low quality. Here's my take on the study hyped by Glasziou: virology.ws/2025/08/16/t...
davetuller1.bsky.social
Paul, you mean most of these randomized trials that are at high risk of bias (per Cochrane risk of bias tool) with outcomes whose quality is overwhelmingly of low or very low quality (per GRADE)? Got it! In Australia, I guess it's typical to take guidance from poorly designed research??