Well it’s a fundraiser for two PACs, so yes they’re charging for it

Was thinking we could dust off this old beauty, but not sure if there are freshwater sources nearby www.kqed.org/science/7109...

Ballroom as a stable for park police horses

Hard to get excited about things like this when there’s no clue of when the building will actually go up.

Huge victory for Democrats if it turns out that way

So I guess OP’s metaphor extends further

It would have taken ten years and a thousand lawsuits before they would even be able to start a project like that but considering he basically torched the place anyway, no need

Fascinating! Well I smashed that Follow button, and take a look at your stuff!

Do you focus mostly on the psychology of the people or do you also take a social/class lens? Just because, between when you talk about a “struggle” to achieve their “desire for humanity”, my brain hears Karl Marx hovering there in the background. A spectre, if you will.

Got it. Well, this is a neat area to have as your area of expertise!

The pro-replace argument would be “many more people need therapy than can afford it so if we can reduce the cost to basically the cost of compute, we’d be helping millions of lower income people live better lives”

Would you say that it’d more from from a “I don’t want therapists to lose their jobs” angle or a “I don’t think we can build a machine that can ethically do the job of a therapist” angle? I would believe the former, I’d be surprised at the latter.

Are you sure about replace therapists? I imagine a lot of software engineers would support this, not out of malice but just from not understanding what therapy is or how it works.

I just hope this doesn’t mean it comes off the tax rolls

Anyone who ever calls someone else an NPC is telling on themselves.