Dylan Lance Armbruster
@dylanarmbruster3.bsky.social
MS student in Statistics
BS in Statistics
BS in Statistics
Oh I apologize. I did not realize you were asking for a critique of PS. I have Pearl's book but haven't read that far yet. I'll check it out.
January 15, 2026 at 2:14 AM
Oh I apologize. I did not realize you were asking for a critique of PS. I have Pearl's book but haven't read that far yet. I'll check it out.
anything from Paul Rosenbaum for an appropriate take on PS.
January 15, 2026 at 1:37 AM
anything from Paul Rosenbaum for an appropriate take on PS.
I don't know that I dislike it as much as you, but I do appreciate say, books that provide arguments that have been made. For and against. A lot of philosophy and history books do this. You decide which one is more convincing.
January 14, 2026 at 2:42 AM
I don't know that I dislike it as much as you, but I do appreciate say, books that provide arguments that have been made. For and against. A lot of philosophy and history books do this. You decide which one is more convincing.
I've looked through quite a lot of Bayesian Statistics books. Hard to find one where they don't talk about Frequentist stats and how they find it the lesser option. Ive only found one Frequentist type book where the book(Aris Spanos) felt dogmatic. I kinda liked seeing it >:)
December 30, 2025 at 3:53 AM
I've looked through quite a lot of Bayesian Statistics books. Hard to find one where they don't talk about Frequentist stats and how they find it the lesser option. Ive only found one Frequentist type book where the book(Aris Spanos) felt dogmatic. I kinda liked seeing it >:)
I've tried both my personal and student emails to register and I keep getting an error about my email not being a valid email.
December 6, 2025 at 1:56 AM
I've tried both my personal and student emails to register and I keep getting an error about my email not being a valid email.
Not p-hacking but definitely some sort of cheating verb.
November 20, 2025 at 4:48 PM
Not p-hacking but definitely some sort of cheating verb.
Do you talk about the arguments for NHST?
psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-...
psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-...
November 18, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Do you talk about the arguments for NHST?
psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-...
psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-...
Confidence Intervals are inverted hypothesis tests.... p-values are fine.
November 18, 2025 at 4:11 PM
Confidence Intervals are inverted hypothesis tests.... p-values are fine.
Wikipedia is good. But I found two Statistics Encyclopedia's that do what I want from Wiki better at times.
November 16, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Wikipedia is good. But I found two Statistics Encyclopedia's that do what I want from Wiki better at times.
Not a Bayesian but maybe you could also add what your goal is? For example are you interested in applied Stats or Math/theo Stats. Im interested in the latter so I'm going to read this one at some point
www.amazon.com/dp/038796098...
www.amazon.com/dp/038796098...
November 8, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Not a Bayesian but maybe you could also add what your goal is? For example are you interested in applied Stats or Math/theo Stats. Im interested in the latter so I'm going to read this one at some point
www.amazon.com/dp/038796098...
www.amazon.com/dp/038796098...
Reposted by Dylan Lance Armbruster
Register here (for FREE): www.causalscience.org
Can't join? Subscribe to get a notification when the recording is out: causalbanditspodcast.com
**Read the report: genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/case-studies...
6/6
#CausalSky
Can't join? Subscribe to get a notification when the recording is out: causalbanditspodcast.com
**Read the report: genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/case-studies...
6/6
#CausalSky
Causal Data Science Meeting - Home
Fostering a dialogue between industry and academia on causal data science.
www.causalscience.org
November 5, 2025 at 8:18 AM
Register here (for FREE): www.causalscience.org
Can't join? Subscribe to get a notification when the recording is out: causalbanditspodcast.com
**Read the report: genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/case-studies...
6/6
#CausalSky
Can't join? Subscribe to get a notification when the recording is out: causalbanditspodcast.com
**Read the report: genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/case-studies...
6/6
#CausalSky
Laughs in C++
November 4, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Laughs in C++
I have a few of Neyman's papers saved. Reading about his inductive inference is interesting.
December 10, 2024 at 8:31 PM
I have a few of Neyman's papers saved. Reading about his inductive inference is interesting.
That is surprising to my noob stat brain.
December 9, 2024 at 4:55 PM
That is surprising to my noob stat brain.
you if all you have is college algebra. But I think it's a great work book to get your feat wet! I've read both the book and workbook in it's entirety and I think the authors have written one of the best HS stat books.
December 9, 2024 at 4:54 PM
you if all you have is college algebra. But I think it's a great work book to get your feat wet! I've read both the book and workbook in it's entirety and I think the authors have written one of the best HS stat books.
There are two books I think you can still use. Statistics by Freedman and Mathematical Methods in Statistics by Freedman is a solid choice if you want to learn about Statistics and some probability. The latter will challenge..
www.amazon.com/Statistics-F...
www.amazon.com/Mathematical...
www.amazon.com/Statistics-F...
www.amazon.com/Mathematical...
Mathematical Methods in Statistics a Workbook
Buy Mathematical Methods in Statistics a Workbook on Amazon.com ✓ FREE SHIPPING on qualified orders
www.amazon.com
December 9, 2024 at 4:52 PM
There are two books I think you can still use. Statistics by Freedman and Mathematical Methods in Statistics by Freedman is a solid choice if you want to learn about Statistics and some probability. The latter will challenge..
www.amazon.com/Statistics-F...
www.amazon.com/Mathematical...
www.amazon.com/Statistics-F...
www.amazon.com/Mathematical...
I can grant that for now. Why do you suppose that is? I would imagine the one with a higher mathematical exposure would have the better understanding. Or from a Philosophical one.
December 9, 2024 at 4:45 PM
I can grant that for now. Why do you suppose that is? I would imagine the one with a higher mathematical exposure would have the better understanding. Or from a Philosophical one.
Would you say the same thing if they went from Bayesian to Frequentist? If yes, then it seems like an advantage independent of what the switch is to. I'm a BS in Statistics, and I know that interpretation is wrong and why it is wrong. This is a critique of the education system.
December 8, 2024 at 7:04 PM
Would you say the same thing if they went from Bayesian to Frequentist? If yes, then it seems like an advantage independent of what the switch is to. I'm a BS in Statistics, and I know that interpretation is wrong and why it is wrong. This is a critique of the education system.
That's frustrating but I see your point. That individual is equivocating on the word probability 🥲
December 7, 2024 at 6:23 PM
That's frustrating but I see your point. That individual is equivocating on the word probability 🥲
They preface it with a promise of "this is what you want to know anyway". But imagine if we did that with say, calculus. A student doesn't quite understand integrals. Would we suggest them just do something else? As a stats/math tutor, I find this a bad solution.
December 7, 2024 at 6:15 PM
They preface it with a promise of "this is what you want to know anyway". But imagine if we did that with say, calculus. A student doesn't quite understand integrals. Would we suggest them just do something else? As a stats/math tutor, I find this a bad solution.