James Eaneman
@eanemanjames.bsky.social
Quiet Bibliophile and Pre-WGA Writer with a (mostly) mild coffee addiction.
www.jameseaneman.wordpress.com
www.jameseaneman.wordpress.com
Reposted by James Eaneman
End of the decade? No, I seriously doubt that. It’s going to take at least a full Democratic administration to clean up this mess.
We could be CLOSER to normal by the end of the decade, but that depends on who takes the mantle of chief jackass on the right when Trump isn’t around anymore.
We could be CLOSER to normal by the end of the decade, but that depends on who takes the mantle of chief jackass on the right when Trump isn’t around anymore.
February 14, 2026 at 1:47 AM
End of the decade? No, I seriously doubt that. It’s going to take at least a full Democratic administration to clean up this mess.
We could be CLOSER to normal by the end of the decade, but that depends on who takes the mantle of chief jackass on the right when Trump isn’t around anymore.
We could be CLOSER to normal by the end of the decade, but that depends on who takes the mantle of chief jackass on the right when Trump isn’t around anymore.
Reposted by James Eaneman
He should, but I don’t think he has enough shame to resign, and I don’t think Trump will force him.
They have a policy on not giving the ‘media’ any ‘scalps’ this time around, so no matter how awful they are, they’re likely to stay.
Only real exception is for embarrassing Trump directly.
They have a policy on not giving the ‘media’ any ‘scalps’ this time around, so no matter how awful they are, they’re likely to stay.
Only real exception is for embarrassing Trump directly.
February 14, 2026 at 1:55 AM
He should, but I don’t think he has enough shame to resign, and I don’t think Trump will force him.
They have a policy on not giving the ‘media’ any ‘scalps’ this time around, so no matter how awful they are, they’re likely to stay.
Only real exception is for embarrassing Trump directly.
They have a policy on not giving the ‘media’ any ‘scalps’ this time around, so no matter how awful they are, they’re likely to stay.
Only real exception is for embarrassing Trump directly.
Reposted by James Eaneman
He can’t. Old man yelling at cloud shit.
If Congress doesn’t pass the SAVE act, there’s nothing Trump can do to force it down our throats unilaterally.
If Congress doesn’t pass the SAVE act, there’s nothing Trump can do to force it down our throats unilaterally.
February 14, 2026 at 1:43 AM
He can’t. Old man yelling at cloud shit.
If Congress doesn’t pass the SAVE act, there’s nothing Trump can do to force it down our throats unilaterally.
If Congress doesn’t pass the SAVE act, there’s nothing Trump can do to force it down our throats unilaterally.
Reposted by James Eaneman
Not directly, but us controlling Venezuela’s oil is killing Cuba.
They’re trying to make the Cuban regime collapse, threatening sanctions on anyone who does business with them, etc.
They’re trying to make the Cuban regime collapse, threatening sanctions on anyone who does business with them, etc.
February 14, 2026 at 1:55 AM
Not directly, but us controlling Venezuela’s oil is killing Cuba.
They’re trying to make the Cuban regime collapse, threatening sanctions on anyone who does business with them, etc.
They’re trying to make the Cuban regime collapse, threatening sanctions on anyone who does business with them, etc.
Reposted by James Eaneman
Probably about 10 seconds after the SAVE act passes, if it does.
I thought we were past the blatant disenfranchisement of women voters thing, though I guess I should have seen it coming after reproductive rights.
I thought we were past the blatant disenfranchisement of women voters thing, though I guess I should have seen it coming after reproductive rights.
February 14, 2026 at 1:37 AM
Probably about 10 seconds after the SAVE act passes, if it does.
I thought we were past the blatant disenfranchisement of women voters thing, though I guess I should have seen it coming after reproductive rights.
I thought we were past the blatant disenfranchisement of women voters thing, though I guess I should have seen it coming after reproductive rights.
Reposted by James Eaneman
That’s my concern. They aren’t building all these detention centers just for immigrants, I fear.
I don’t think that’s going to work out the way they want it to, though.
As far as to what end, the cruelty is always the point with these people.
I don’t think that’s going to work out the way they want it to, though.
As far as to what end, the cruelty is always the point with these people.
February 14, 2026 at 1:52 AM
That’s my concern. They aren’t building all these detention centers just for immigrants, I fear.
I don’t think that’s going to work out the way they want it to, though.
As far as to what end, the cruelty is always the point with these people.
I don’t think that’s going to work out the way they want it to, though.
As far as to what end, the cruelty is always the point with these people.
