Emaux
@emauxstylo.bsky.social
110 followers 480 following 870 posts
Opinionated hermit and aspiring francophone
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
emauxstylo.bsky.social
Me: Look, it's not that I don't like Rice Pudding!
Eleanor Rigby: *still looking offended*
Reposted by Emaux
Reposted by Emaux
tedmccormick.bsky.social
Much good stuff in here but this is the heart of it
This is the grain of sand at the center of the pearl of my ire, because "we are going to have to live here with each other" is the
exact premise that Republicans do not agree with any of us about, and while Klein in his remarks pays lip service to some of the recent proofs of this clear fact, his analysis of what to do about it he excises this reality entirely. In his mind, he and Kirk were just two guys, both trying to change the country for what they thought was good. It's a bond. Never mind that what Kirk thought was good was the American military in the streets of Chicago, and mass kidnapping in service of a white ethnostate, and the end of bodily autonomy for women and queer people, and so forth. In the Klein world, moral clarity about abuse is polarizing, and polarization, not abuse, is the problem to solve.
Reposted by Emaux
marcusjdl.bsky.social
Fucking hell
adambienkov.bsky.social
Keir Starmer’s spokesman asked about Israel detaining British citizens who were on the Gaza aid flotilla, while in international waters, replies that it is a “matter for the Israeli Government”
emauxstylo.bsky.social
Has there ever been a better final episode for a show than Star Trek TNG's All Good Things...

I know there are some classics from the 2000s, where plot arcs are resolved, twists made, but All Good Things is a great ending, and one of the best TNG stories on its own terms.
emauxstylo.bsky.social
And it's why people like Trump, who can't maintain a standard from one moment to the next because they're stupid, make natural fascists. Everything is reduced solely to it's immediate use, and the inconsistencies in that are stabilised by use of force.
emauxstylo.bsky.social
I think one of great missing pieces in public understanding of Fascism, honestly, is how much it's about might makes right, not just in a physical sense, but a rhetorical one. For the Fascist, having the will to make your position the loudest *is* truth. It's why hypocrisy doesn't stick to them.
gwensnyder.bsky.social
And by contempt here I mean, he just isn't significant enough to merit their attention, so they're done.

If his death and memory are no longer useful, that's proof enough for them that actually he wasn't that important in life.

They stripped his memory for parts and now he's junk to them.
emauxstylo.bsky.social
When the dome is coming down and everyone in the bar runs into the church, and everyone in the church runs into the bar is actually an excellent joke though.
emauxstylo.bsky.social
The thing I always think about the movie is that it's a very good example of all the best bits of that era, firing on all cylinders, and doing their best work.

But that era was still really bad and so the movie is mostly too.
emauxstylo.bsky.social
You're thinking with your stickers again, Steve.
Reposted by Emaux
gillmartin.bsky.social
Met police calling on Anti-Genocide protestors not to protest today are saying they cannot keep the capital safe from any real terrorism because they have to arrest the people sitting peacefully, holding cardboard signs.
#protest #Palestine #genocide #gaza #defendourjuries
Reposted by Emaux
flyingrodent.bsky.social
Yes, all the same racist hate and incitement is now right in the middle of Sensible Centrist politics *and* MPs and our entire press spent the 2010s screaming hate at right on students, anti-racist activists and the left in general. Could these things all be related? Could they be *the same thing*.
James Ball O
@jamesrball.com • 8m
"To be honest, I think things are worse now than in 1979," he says. "Clearly, there was a lot more racial violence then than there is now, but it's coming back. What's worse now is that the rhetoric of the extreme far right is not too dissimilar from the rhetoric across the political spectrum."
emauxstylo.bsky.social
Right, because using Labour's cynicism to avoid doing the right thing is also *extremely cynical politics*.

You're trying to externalise the consequences of your own party's actions on to anyone else who doesn't agree with them.

Sorry, it doesn't work like that.
emauxstylo.bsky.social
The problem with this, Steve, is that it's much easier to vote to proscribe a group again in future than it is to un-proscribe a group, because as soon as you do that, nobody can advocate for that group.

These two paths aren't equal. This is obvious if you think without your Lib Dem stickers on.
emauxstylo.bsky.social
I suppose what I'm getting at is that, sure, nobody really objects to proscribing dangerous fascists, but anyone with a brain can see that two fringe and not particularly relevant in that moment groups were picked to provide cover for the PA proscription, and you're falling for it.
emauxstylo.bsky.social
And had you heard of them before they were cited as the Lib Dem's justification for abstention?

Because far right groups and their operations are an area of interest of mine, and I'd heard of RIM but I'd never heard of MMC until July, and even then couldn't find *much* about them.
emauxstylo.bsky.social
We all know this, Steve.

The difference is that you think it was a justified course of action and other people don't.

That's not complicated.
emauxstylo.bsky.social
Steve, here's a little experiment, without looking it up can you tell me the names of the fascist organisations that were proscribed?
emauxstylo.bsky.social
How do you think you're doing making your case here, Steve?
emauxstylo.bsky.social
*proscription. Sigh.
emauxstylo.bsky.social
But you realise that other people aren't obliged to believe a party's spin on every issue right?

Like, to me it sounds like the Lib Dems wanted to complain about the prescription, but not actually take any heat from it, because that's what they always do.
emauxstylo.bsky.social
Gervais in a room backstage with a bunch of Sheikhs trying to explain why the Office is funny, while they just shake their heads confused and explain it's just not their kind of comedy.
sloanelysbeth.bsky.social
i was kindly surprised that ricky gervais wasn't at the riyadh comedy festival and then i realised he probably just wasn't asked.
Reposted by Emaux
sloanelysbeth.bsky.social
i was kindly surprised that ricky gervais wasn't at the riyadh comedy festival and then i realised he probably just wasn't asked.
emauxstylo.bsky.social
Sounds like the Lib Dems walked into a Labour trap and are now trying to have their cake and eat it, honestly.

What's dishonest about saying they voted for something they voted for?