eric anders
@ericanders.bsky.social
photographer • writer about film & pop culture • bylines in slashfilm, tvline, indiewire, & more • @ericanders on instagram & letterboxd • 🍅
The mother of Keith Porter speaking during today’s L.A. City Council meeting partsofanovelimdoing.substack.com/p/we-are-out...
"We are out here fighting this!"
Reflections on addressing the LA City Council, the deaths of Renee Good and Keith Porter, and seeing in metaphor
partsofanovelimdoing.substack.com
January 10, 2026 at 7:37 AM
The mother of Keith Porter speaking during today’s L.A. City Council meeting partsofanovelimdoing.substack.com/p/we-are-out...
I've been a little down on this season... and I think it's likely cause I didn't get a chance to rewatch, so I'm finding some of the plot mechanics and lore dumps kind of incomprehensible.
But you're right. On a character level, I have so much affection for all of them still, so it's still working.
But you're right. On a character level, I have so much affection for all of them still, so it's still working.
December 31, 2025 at 7:38 PM
I've been a little down on this season... and I think it's likely cause I didn't get a chance to rewatch, so I'm finding some of the plot mechanics and lore dumps kind of incomprehensible.
But you're right. On a character level, I have so much affection for all of them still, so it's still working.
But you're right. On a character level, I have so much affection for all of them still, so it's still working.
A foundational text in Cursive Singing Studies: youtube.com/shorts/8SU0g...
Chrish - Indie girl introduces us to her kitchen (Vine)
YouTube video by Jabonzo
youtube.com
December 30, 2025 at 12:20 PM
A foundational text in Cursive Singing Studies: youtube.com/shorts/8SU0g...
This discourse has been very strange. The reasoning is nonsensical, and I think it's actively harmful to our understanding of what "the Epstein Files" are, what they show, what they don't, and what they mean going forward.
I wrote about it here:
partsofanovelimdoing.substack.com/p/the-admini...
I wrote about it here:
partsofanovelimdoing.substack.com/p/the-admini...
"The administration inserted a photo into the files..."
Reflections on "the Epstein Files," narrative-building, and charging at windmills
partsofanovelimdoing.substack.com
December 21, 2025 at 7:45 PM
This discourse has been very strange. The reasoning is nonsensical, and I think it's actively harmful to our understanding of what "the Epstein Files" are, what they show, what they don't, and what they mean going forward.
I wrote about it here:
partsofanovelimdoing.substack.com/p/the-admini...
I wrote about it here:
partsofanovelimdoing.substack.com/p/the-admini...
A vastly more plausible scenario than “the administration inserted it into the files!”
December 21, 2025 at 1:57 AM
A vastly more plausible scenario than “the administration inserted it into the files!”
— and by that I mean, the .jpg itself was somehow in Epstein’s possession.
That’s it.
They are overwhelming everyone by dumping everything (well, you know what I mean) related to the case in any way — as the law required. They have no interest in telling us HOW, so we’re charging at windmills.
That’s it.
They are overwhelming everyone by dumping everything (well, you know what I mean) related to the case in any way — as the law required. They have no interest in telling us HOW, so we’re charging at windmills.
December 21, 2025 at 1:31 AM
— and by that I mean, the .jpg itself was somehow in Epstein’s possession.
That’s it.
They are overwhelming everyone by dumping everything (well, you know what I mean) related to the case in any way — as the law required. They have no interest in telling us HOW, so we’re charging at windmills.
That’s it.
They are overwhelming everyone by dumping everything (well, you know what I mean) related to the case in any way — as the law required. They have no interest in telling us HOW, so we’re charging at windmills.
is meant to obfuscate, to make everything seem ominous so that nothing seems ominous because if you overreact about this, you’re overreacting about that.
That. Is. A. Different. Photo. The government did not grab a photo from Getty to “fake the files.” The image itself is somehow related to Epstein
That. Is. A. Different. Photo. The government did not grab a photo from Getty to “fake the files.” The image itself is somehow related to Epstein
December 21, 2025 at 1:29 AM
is meant to obfuscate, to make everything seem ominous so that nothing seems ominous because if you overreact about this, you’re overreacting about that.
That. Is. A. Different. Photo. The government did not grab a photo from Getty to “fake the files.” The image itself is somehow related to Epstein
That. Is. A. Different. Photo. The government did not grab a photo from Getty to “fake the files.” The image itself is somehow related to Epstein
The redactions: ridiculous!
But it is very clear that most people have no fucking idea what “the Epstein files” are, what they’ve been asking for for years, or what they’ve been given.
For all we know, someone texted this pic to Epstein, so it was scraped with everything else. The lack of context
But it is very clear that most people have no fucking idea what “the Epstein files” are, what they’ve been asking for for years, or what they’ve been given.
For all we know, someone texted this pic to Epstein, so it was scraped with everything else. The lack of context
December 21, 2025 at 1:28 AM
The redactions: ridiculous!
But it is very clear that most people have no fucking idea what “the Epstein files” are, what they’ve been asking for for years, or what they’ve been given.
For all we know, someone texted this pic to Epstein, so it was scraped with everything else. The lack of context
But it is very clear that most people have no fucking idea what “the Epstein files” are, what they’ve been asking for for years, or what they’ve been given.
For all we know, someone texted this pic to Epstein, so it was scraped with everything else. The lack of context