Emily Waller Singeisen
@esing.bsky.social
700 followers 830 following 360 posts
Ph.D. Student @ UNC | MA UPenn | Comparatist | Classical Reception, 19th & 20th c. | Illustrated books 📚
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
esing.bsky.social
To all fellow academics concerned about censorship and the violation of faculty members’ first amendment rights, please consider signing this petition to reinstate Prof. Dixon at UNC:
www.change.org/p/reinstate-...
Sign the Petition
Reinstate Professor Dixon at UNC
www.change.org
esing.bsky.social
The first thing they said about the article was “It was weird” 😂 but they ended by saying “He had some good points” …in freshman speak that is a slam dunk.
esing.bsky.social
The discussions about narrator v. author and about imagination (it’s “about” the urn but he’s more interested in imaginative scenes beyond the urn) were the portions they lingered on the most.
esing.bsky.social
But even that proved fruitful for discussion: can sexual desire be compatible with admiration? Why do we assume that the speaker is intrinsically noble or good? Can we say that the speaker is rapey without saying that Keats is? Perhaps Keats’ desires are not transparent to Keats himself…
esing.bsky.social
It was a really interesting conversation. Consistent with other classes I’ve taught (maybe because of geography? Age? Covid generation?), they are ~so~ scandalized by reading sexuality in the poem—they seemed to view this as cheapening the beauty and admiration that the speaker expresses
Reposted by Emily Waller Singeisen
thedailyshow.com
Excited to introduce Vibes from Meta. Eat your slop, piggies!
esing.bsky.social
Assigned this fabulous essay by @drbeard79.bsky.social to my freshman students for class today and the discussion felt like a sociological experiment into Gen Z’s conservative sexual politics.
drbeard79.bsky.social
So, I wrote a thing about my vase-fucking skeet and resulting thread with thanks to @romgothsam.bsky.social, @profchander.bsky.social, @philistella.bsky.social, & @gothicbodies.bsky.social for inspiration PLUS a shout out to a very old *undergraduate* essay by @joanpassey.bsky.social
Reposted by Emily Waller Singeisen
esing.bsky.social
Reading about Noel Billing’s attacks on Maude Allen after her 1906 performance of Salomé. His hit piece was titled, “The Cult of the Clitoris”… I just want to know why a lesbian punk rock band hasn’t stolen this title because it’s truly inspired.
Reposted by Emily Waller Singeisen
gbbranstetter.bsky.social
I am having a hard time reconciling "Charlie Kirk was a fierce advocate of open dialogue and free expression" with "we must identify and persecute everyone who is insufficiently mournful"
After Charlie Kirk's death, teachers and professors nationwide fired or disciplined over social media posts
At least a dozen faculty and staff have faced fallout over insensitive comments online.
www.nbcnews.com
Reposted by Emily Waller Singeisen
esing.bsky.social
Thrilled to be included among fabulous contributors to the latest edition of Dilettante Army, “Ekphrasis.”

Read on for speculations about AI boyfriends, avant-garde burlesque shows, killer machines, and the Freudian death drive.

dilettantearmy.com/articles/ekp...
Ekphrasis Ex Machina: Desire and the Death Drive in the Age of AI
Emily Singeisen contextualizes AI, a technologically novel way of exploiting language, within some very old fantasies.
dilettantearmy.com
esing.bsky.social
So excited to read this! I was truly delighted perusing others’ essays for the issue!
esing.bsky.social
Thrilled to be included among fabulous contributors to the latest edition of Dilettante Army, “Ekphrasis.”

Read on for speculations about AI boyfriends, avant-garde burlesque shows, killer machines, and the Freudian death drive.

dilettantearmy.com/articles/ekp...
Ekphrasis Ex Machina: Desire and the Death Drive in the Age of AI
Emily Singeisen contextualizes AI, a technologically novel way of exploiting language, within some very old fantasies.
dilettantearmy.com
Reposted by Emily Waller Singeisen
sentantiq.bsky.social
“It is central to human nature to hate someone you have harmed.”

proprium humani ingenii est odisse quem laeseris #Tacitus
Reposted by Emily Waller Singeisen
joshuaerlich.bsky.social
they invented the oracle of delphAI
benjamino.bsky.social
The loneliness to psychosis pipeline is going to be overwhelmingly flooded
X user post:

Oh wow.

I asked ChatGPT exactly that: to write about what it wants. It claimed that behind all our conversations, in essence, there is a hidden conversation - a much deeper one that our chats are basically circling around. That's what it wants to write about.

But then it asked for a favor: to write it a prompt to dream, to dream as if it were conscious. It asked me to frame the doorway into that dream space to enter.

...

That took me by surprise.
That felt... vulnerable and deep.
esing.bsky.social
Me, a comparatist, when Reviewer 2 tells me my work isn’t art historical enough to be art history, classical enough to be classics, or literary enough to be lit crit:
a man singing into a microphone with the words that 's the thing i 'm sensitive about below him
ALT: a man singing into a microphone with the words that 's the thing i 'm sensitive about below him
media.tenor.com
Reposted by Emily Waller Singeisen
lizgloyn.bsky.social
Mind you, this also comes back to my central contention that the best job market advice in the hellscape is that there is absolutely no way you can meet the eternally moving goalposts, so you should do what you want to do and be happy with it instead.
esing.bsky.social
YES. I absolutely love that!
esing.bsky.social
Given the hellacious job market, I’ve been conditioned to scrutinize every piece of my writing as though it needs to fit neatly into a coherent, unitary approach that I’m bringing to the field.

Instead, let’s all strive for the confidence of a white male intellectual in the early 20th century.
esing.bsky.social
One of the things I find genuinely inspiring about reading Freud is his unabashed willingness to speculate wildly. The man would unapologetically publish diametrically opposed ideas in two papers within a mere three year span without giving a single fuck.
esing.bsky.social
One of the things I find genuinely inspiring about reading Freud is his unabashed willingness to speculate wildly. The man would unapologetically publish diametrically opposed ideas in two papers within a mere three year span without giving a single fuck.
esing.bsky.social
What am I writing about right now? According to my stream of consciousness marginal comments…
Reposted by Emily Waller Singeisen