James Fraser
banner
fraserlab.com
James Fraser
@fraserlab.com
Professor and Chair @UCSF/@UCSF_BTS - dynamic structural biology and open science - (he/him) - fraserlab.com
Reposted by James Fraser
As soon as NIH decided that preprints were A-OK we started preprinting everything.

The biggest negative is that now once we've preprinted I lose interest in the actual peer-reviewed article. Which for me isn't a big deal (I'm tenured) but my folk aren't. So I need to force myself to keep up on it
January 12, 2026 at 8:25 PM
Do you have a repo I can look at invite github.com/fraserlab if private if you are comfortable?
fraserlab - Overview
fraserlab has 2 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub.
github.com
January 12, 2026 at 10:06 PM
This is cool - is it: app.benchmate.ai/pricing or something you are writing?
Benchmate.ai
app.benchmate.ai
January 12, 2026 at 3:57 PM
Me too. Just trying to brainstorm ideas that might incentivize more retirement without a forcing function of a hard cutoff
January 7, 2026 at 9:21 PM
Sorry. I misread! Many reacting strongly the other way - they should just be forced to retire at age X.
January 7, 2026 at 9:19 PM
I think the trouble is that people are still competitive- and don’t have an off-ramp for their identity as a scientist. I’m with you, I’ll exit stage right when the time comes. But I see many who don’t….
January 7, 2026 at 9:14 PM
from: hhmicdn.blob.core.windows.net/policies/Inv... "expanded phase out" of 5 years, rather than going through competitive renewal (7 years if successful and 2 years if not)
January 7, 2026 at 7:36 PM
Based partially on observations of this working: bsky.app/profile/fras...
A point in favour of this: an off ramp exists for HHMI investigators and many actually take it
January 7, 2026 at 7:29 PM
A point in favour of this: an off ramp exists for HHMI investigators and many actually take it
January 7, 2026 at 7:29 PM
I agree it’s hard. Much like convincing them to retire. But the alternative isn’t retiring. It’s renewing their R01.
January 7, 2026 at 7:23 PM
People just don’t do it though. I think an off-ramp program would allow people to hold their heads high, maintain identity as a scientist ,etc.

Trying to brainstorm policy ways to get people to do actually do it.
January 7, 2026 at 7:20 PM
Great. I don’t think advocating for either or both of these are mutually exclusive. Need many policy ideas for this problem…
January 7, 2026 at 7:18 PM
Tenure is tenure.

www.nytimes.com/1990/10/21/s...

And I knew and really loved Howard (TAed his ethics class for many years)…
Campus Life: Berkeley; Biochemist, 71, Fights Mandatory Retirement (Published 1990)
www.nytimes.com
January 7, 2026 at 7:17 PM
Yes. We have such programs but - How do you get them to transition out to free up resources? Hence the reverse K99 as a potential off ramp policy…
January 7, 2026 at 7:08 PM
The problem is people don’t retire. What’s a policy solution to help?
January 7, 2026 at 6:55 PM
I also do- but I’ll tell you there aren’t really any levers of incentives to get people to do that
January 7, 2026 at 6:55 PM
The alternative isn’t no money. It’s 4-5 years of them renewing.
January 7, 2026 at 6:54 PM
It’s called coercion! People won’t retire…
January 7, 2026 at 6:54 PM
Mine is 1.4Å!
January 7, 2026 at 6:22 AM
Congrats Andrew! Glad my old CypA lab notes were helpful
January 6, 2026 at 5:42 PM
Why is this an “or”?
January 5, 2026 at 10:33 PM
Imagine if biorxiv automated such notifications using “email”. What a service it would be!!!
January 5, 2026 at 4:44 PM