Is the mad king watching the History Channel or is this somehow part of the Kash Patel/Bongino clown show?

CA7: Under circuit precedent, homeowner can't sue under the Takings Clause for damage to house caused by execution of a search warrant there.
media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Opin... #N

Another indication that these people are terminally online and increasingly disconnected from the real world.

Bill Belichick and Hulu's documentary to chronicle his first year at UNC has been canceled. Heh.

www.msn.com/en-us/sports...

The constitutional remedy for a president who is using public money contrary to congressional appropriations is impeachment, removal, and disqualification.

(And would have, before Justice Roberts got a bright idea, led to eventual criminal charges.)

2:15 pm - Speaker Johnson says Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva D-AZ can be sworn in 'as soon as she wants.'

Two hours later, GOP tells reporters Grijalva won't be sworn in until the government shutdown is over.

This. And it applies to more than just the birthright citizenship EO. The SCOTUS majority keeps allowing Trump's lawless actions to proceed during litigation, most often without any explanation, and despite hundreds of pages of factfinding and analysis in the lower courts that SCOTUS just ignores.

“Who was president in 2020?” is the question of our time

(Virginia Democrats are not actually in crisis. This is Axios being Axios. We will revisit after election day.)

Yes. I assume he insisted.

4th Cir. holds it was no prejudicial error for jury to consider evidence of Nazi memorabilia possessed by a man accused of racially motivated assaults on a Mexican-American man and a black man, particularly after defendant mentioned his collection on the stand.

www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/244...

Sometimes when a case has a particularly lengthy or complicated history (like remands or MTRs), a graphic like this is an aid to the reader.

Here, it's just like: look, the most ordinary, almost streamlined (just five months before the Board in 2024!) procedural history for a removal case.

Don't think I've seen this before, at least not in a case with such an ordinary timeline.

Judge Tymkovich offers a graphic detailing the administrative procedural history in an immigration case that spans a relatively short Dec. 15, 2022 to Oct. 24, 2024.

www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/f...

More airport delays: Denver, Burbank, and Newark.

www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...

"Body-camera video of a Border Patrol agent involved in the shooting of a woman who was allegedly chasing agents in Brighton Park over the weekend shows an officer saying, “Do something, bitch” before pulling over and shooting the woman 5 times, the woman’s attorney said in federal court Monday" omg

The Trump appointee accusing the president’s political foes of mortgage fraud skipped over his agency’s inspector general when making criminal referrals,, bypassing rules meant to ensure that federal officials don’t abuse their power for partisan purposes.

www.reuters.com/world/us/tru...

Same thing happened in LA, same thing happened in DC: prosecutors charged people with assaulting a federal officer and then furiously backpedaled when the evidence didn’t support it

"We live in a country with a First Amendment."

This is really a failure to train, plaintiffs' lawyer says, noting a point raised often that so many of these federal officials are not appropriately trained for what amounts to community-based policing.

A top Trump official accusing federal district court judges, "as a class," of engaging in insurrection is a profoundly dangerous development.

MSNBC is reporting that a top prosecutor in USAO-EDVA plans to tell new interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan that there is no probable cause to charge New York AG Letitia James for mortgage fraud.

www.msnbc.com/msnbc/news/t...

French TikToker sentenced to twelve months in prison for stabbing unsuspecting bystanders with a needle for that sweet hashtag content.

www.dexerto.com/tiktok/tikto...

This is frustrating. Trump is rushing troops to Illinois for exact the purpose of outpacing the judiciary. Just as they rushed deportations. A TRO is an appropriate tool to issue to ensure the status quo continues for up to fourteen days. She does not need to wait for the administration's reponse.

Oh, that's an interesting thought. Here, though, the dissenting judge uses she/her. I would imagine it was in the inmate's briefing.

“… the data out of Montgomery County, Maryland makes one thing unmistakably clear: this crusade is not a mass movement. It’s the obsession of a vanishingly small minority …”