Great Aunt Nanny
@greatauntnanny.bsky.social
Little bit good at a lot. Expert in nothing. Possible inverse relationship between opinions and facts.
💙 Nevertheless, she persisted as a Dem in TN
💙 Nevertheless, she persisted as a Dem in TN
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
lol I just came across this post by Zoharn’s wife Rama Duwaji’s stylist and the boots were…. on loan
open.substack.com/pub/brainmat...
open.substack.com/pub/brainmat...
January 2, 2026 at 3:17 AM
lol I just came across this post by Zoharn’s wife Rama Duwaji’s stylist and the boots were…. on loan
open.substack.com/pub/brainmat...
open.substack.com/pub/brainmat...
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
Mamdani: For too long, those fluent in the good grammar of civility have deployed decorum to mask agendas of cruelty
January 1, 2026 at 8:00 PM
Mamdani: For too long, those fluent in the good grammar of civility have deployed decorum to mask agendas of cruelty
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
1/ Smith explains that Trump’s statements about supposed election “fraud” are different from anything in the historical record because they were not merely complaints about an unfair election,
January 1, 2026 at 1:06 PM
1/ Smith explains that Trump’s statements about supposed election “fraud” are different from anything in the historical record because they were not merely complaints about an unfair election,
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
Timezones are so weird. Australia is in 2026, Canada is in 2025, and the United States is in 1939.
December 31, 2025 at 6:12 PM
Timezones are so weird. Australia is in 2026, Canada is in 2025, and the United States is in 1939.
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
The notion that Donald Trump can direct the DOJ to investigate Jack Smith regardless of whether Smith committed any crime should make everyone in America ill
“Would you be surprised if President Trump directs the DOJ to indict you?”
Jack Smith: “No.”
Jack Smith: “No.”
December 31, 2025 at 9:02 PM
The notion that Donald Trump can direct the DOJ to investigate Jack Smith regardless of whether Smith committed any crime should make everyone in America ill
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
Dec 2024 www.rollingstone.com/politics/pol...
January 1, 2026 at 3:39 AM
Dec 2024 www.rollingstone.com/politics/pol...
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
New Year’s Eve release should not obscure Jack Smith’s testimony. He collected evidence lawfully, and he believed it would prove Trump’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-su...
judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-su...
judiciary.house.gov
January 1, 2026 at 2:34 AM
New Year’s Eve release should not obscure Jack Smith’s testimony. He collected evidence lawfully, and he believed it would prove Trump’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-su...
judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-su...
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
Former special counsel Jack Smith also described President Trump as the "most culpable and most responsible person" in the criminal conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election results, according to a transcript of Smith's closed-door interview with the House Judiciary Committee. n.pr/49cmd6E
Capitol riot 'does not happen' without Trump, Jack Smith told Congress
Former special counsel Jack Smith also described President Trump as the "most culpable and most responsible person" in the criminal conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election results, according to a transcript of Smith's closed-door interview with the House Judiciary Committee.
n.pr
January 1, 2026 at 2:30 AM
Former special counsel Jack Smith also described President Trump as the "most culpable and most responsible person" in the criminal conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election results, according to a transcript of Smith's closed-door interview with the House Judiciary Committee. n.pr/49cmd6E
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
On Jack Smith deposition, now released:
100% obvious why GOP refused to allow this as open testimony, aired live. It's damning.
Testimony from John Dean or Alex ("wiretaps") Butterfield in Watergate days would have 1/10th the impact if just in print.
What Smith says is far more incriminating.
100% obvious why GOP refused to allow this as open testimony, aired live. It's damning.
Testimony from John Dean or Alex ("wiretaps") Butterfield in Watergate days would have 1/10th the impact if just in print.
What Smith says is far more incriminating.
December 31, 2025 at 10:46 PM
On Jack Smith deposition, now released:
100% obvious why GOP refused to allow this as open testimony, aired live. It's damning.
Testimony from John Dean or Alex ("wiretaps") Butterfield in Watergate days would have 1/10th the impact if just in print.
What Smith says is far more incriminating.
100% obvious why GOP refused to allow this as open testimony, aired live. It's damning.
Testimony from John Dean or Alex ("wiretaps") Butterfield in Watergate days would have 1/10th the impact if just in print.
What Smith says is far more incriminating.
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
JACK SMITH: “The attack that happened at the Capitol does not happen without Trump. The other co-conspirators were doing this for his benefit.”
January 1, 2026 at 1:42 AM
JACK SMITH: “The attack that happened at the Capitol does not happen without Trump. The other co-conspirators were doing this for his benefit.”
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
Question: But the president’s statements that he believed the election was rife with fraud—those are statements protected by the First Amendment, correct?
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
December 31, 2025 at 9:04 PM
Question: But the president’s statements that he believed the election was rife with fraud—those are statements protected by the First Amendment, correct?
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
Jack Smith: I believe we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt in both cases.
December 31, 2025 at 8:15 PM
Jack Smith: I believe we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt in both cases.
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
Smith: He was getting calls from people he trusts, people he relies on—and he still refused to come to the aid of the people at the Capitol. That’s very important evidence for criminal intent in our case.
December 31, 2025 at 10:11 PM
Smith: He was getting calls from people he trusts, people he relies on—and he still refused to come to the aid of the people at the Capitol. That’s very important evidence for criminal intent in our case.
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
“Did you believe you had sufficient evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction against Donald Trump for interference with the lawful transfer of power?”
JACK SMITH: “Yes.”
JACK SMITH: “Yes.”
December 31, 2025 at 11:09 PM
“Did you believe you had sufficient evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction against Donald Trump for interference with the lawful transfer of power?”
JACK SMITH: “Yes.”
JACK SMITH: “Yes.”
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
The Department of Energy gets community noted for parroting Dear Leader’s lies
December 31, 2025 at 5:48 AM
The Department of Energy gets community noted for parroting Dear Leader’s lies
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
Pam Bondi... What is This? We know it’s an August 2019 email that was sent 9 days after Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The email was sent to a Detective in the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force. The subject reads: “Epstein Co-conspirator Pics.” But all the pics are redacted.
December 31, 2025 at 3:34 AM
Pam Bondi... What is This? We know it’s an August 2019 email that was sent 9 days after Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The email was sent to a Detective in the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force. The subject reads: “Epstein Co-conspirator Pics.” But all the pics are redacted.
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
Mark Elias for ATTORNEY GENERAL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
December 31, 2025 at 1:33 AM
Mark Elias for ATTORNEY GENERAL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
The NY Times interviewed over 30 of Epstein’s former employees, victims, & associates. The result is one of the most revealing looks into Trump’s sex crimes and friendship with Epstein seen in years.
We’ve condensed the massive story into a TIMELINE of some sex crimes related to Trump . . .
We’ve condensed the massive story into a TIMELINE of some sex crimes related to Trump . . .
New claims of Trump pursuing underage girls
Drugging women, Epstein sex parties, and pressuring minors to drink? The Epstein Files are heavily redacted, but this incredible reporting from yesterday isn't.
trumpfile.substack.com
December 21, 2025 at 11:41 PM
The NY Times interviewed over 30 of Epstein’s former employees, victims, & associates. The result is one of the most revealing looks into Trump’s sex crimes and friendship with Epstein seen in years.
We’ve condensed the massive story into a TIMELINE of some sex crimes related to Trump . . .
We’ve condensed the massive story into a TIMELINE of some sex crimes related to Trump . . .
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
👇👇👇
Since there seems to be files getting deleted from the Epstein release, I've made all four dataset zip files available for download. These are the files as they were originally released. (Downloaded within minutes of them being made public)
~3GB in size
drive.proton.me/urls/P0XVG30...
~3GB in size
drive.proton.me/urls/P0XVG30...
Proton Drive
Securely store, share, and access your important files and photos. Anytime, anywhere.
drive.proton.me
December 21, 2025 at 1:29 AM
👇👇👇
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
“The New York Times contacted Ms. Farmer about a report stamped with the date of Sept. 3, 1996. She broke down in tears.
“I’ve waited 30 years,” she said. “I can’t believe it. They can’t call me a liar anymore.”
“I’ve waited 30 years,” she said. “I can’t believe it. They can’t call me a liar anymore.”
HUGE NEWS from the new Epstein files:
Records show that Maria Farmer, who worked for Epstein, filed a "child pornography" report to the FBI in 1996.
The FBI has never before acknowledged that complaint. The case went nowhere, and mass abuse followed.
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/19/u...
Records show that Maria Farmer, who worked for Epstein, filed a "child pornography" report to the FBI in 1996.
The FBI has never before acknowledged that complaint. The case went nowhere, and mass abuse followed.
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/19/u...
Epstein Files Include 1996 Child Porn Complaint That F.B.I. Ignored
www.nytimes.com
December 20, 2025 at 12:58 AM
“The New York Times contacted Ms. Farmer about a report stamped with the date of Sept. 3, 1996. She broke down in tears.
“I’ve waited 30 years,” she said. “I can’t believe it. They can’t call me a liar anymore.”
“I’ve waited 30 years,” she said. “I can’t believe it. They can’t call me a liar anymore.”
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
It will always be sad and embarrassing that the felon got away with this.
December 18, 2025 at 12:56 AM
It will always be sad and embarrassing that the felon got away with this.
This cannot be real?? The plaque beneath President Biden reads “Sleepy Joe Biden was, by far, the worst president in American history”. What the actual fvck?
New White House plaques attack Trump's Democratic predecessors, Bush - www.reuters.com/world/us/new...
New White House plaques attack Trump's Democratic predecessors, Bush - www.reuters.com/world/us/new...
New White House plaques attack Trump's Democratic predecessors, Bush
Press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the plaques were an "eloquent" description of each president's legacy.
www.reuters.com
December 17, 2025 at 11:24 PM
This cannot be real?? The plaque beneath President Biden reads “Sleepy Joe Biden was, by far, the worst president in American history”. What the actual fvck?
New White House plaques attack Trump's Democratic predecessors, Bush - www.reuters.com/world/us/new...
New White House plaques attack Trump's Democratic predecessors, Bush - www.reuters.com/world/us/new...
Reposted by Great Aunt Nanny
I can’t believe I have to do this.
But okay, for everyone wondering why Susie Wiles said all that shit…
It was all a smokescreen for this ONE statement.
Everything else she said was designed to make you say “oh… look… she’s being honest”… just so you’d believe this one thing.
But okay, for everyone wondering why Susie Wiles said all that shit…
It was all a smokescreen for this ONE statement.
Everything else she said was designed to make you say “oh… look… she’s being honest”… just so you’d believe this one thing.
December 16, 2025 at 9:42 PM
I can’t believe I have to do this.
But okay, for everyone wondering why Susie Wiles said all that shit…
It was all a smokescreen for this ONE statement.
Everything else she said was designed to make you say “oh… look… she’s being honest”… just so you’d believe this one thing.
But okay, for everyone wondering why Susie Wiles said all that shit…
It was all a smokescreen for this ONE statement.
Everything else she said was designed to make you say “oh… look… she’s being honest”… just so you’d believe this one thing.