HopelessSeeker77
hopesr77.bsky.social
HopelessSeeker77
@hopesr77.bsky.social
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
It’s crucial to note that the DEMOCRATS are the ones leading these efforts. Trump sucks, but Dems are the ones pushing these Heritage Foundation-backed laws through & making them more extreme

Go to BadInternetBills.com for scripts to call your representatives, background info on the laws, and more
Bad Internet Bills
All of the bad internet bills. One website.
BadInternetBills.com
January 5, 2026 at 1:16 AM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
When these lawmakers and pundits talk about “protecting youth mental health” what they mean is that they think IG is turning kids gay and trans and so we need to block their access to the internet/cell phones completely so they don’t become trans or gay. That’s what these laws are about.
Jonathan Haidt Promoted a Fringe Theory on Trans Youth — Assigned
The author of “The Anxiety Generation” told Margaret Hoover for PBS that young people become trans due to peer contagion effects. There is no evidence for this claim.
www.assignedmedia.org
January 5, 2026 at 1:09 AM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
None of this is about protecting kids. The co-sponsor of the Kids Online Safety Act said we need to pass it to protect kids from “the transgender” in society. Jonathan Haidt, the right wing reactionary who has boosted these laws alongside the Heritage Foundation has spread anti trans conspiracies
Social Media Bans Aren’t About Protecting Kids. They’re About Censorship and Surveillance
US politicians want to replicate Australia's draconian law prohibiting children under 16 from using social media. But experts say such bans will actually make kids 'significantly less safe online.'
open.substack.com
January 5, 2026 at 1:07 AM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
Enacting mass surveillance/censorship is a gift to big tech, these laws do NOTHING to challenge big tech’s business model, instead they reward them w the ability to collect even more data on users including children. They will put smaller and less profit driven platforms and forums out of business.
The Latest Government Gift to Big Tech and Corporate Power
Lawmakers claim new age verification laws are about ‘child safety’ – but, in reality, they expand surveillance and silence dissent.
zeteo.com
January 5, 2026 at 1:05 AM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
Call your reps this January and tell them:

— NO to KOSA
— NO to Section 230 reform
— NO to the SCREEN Act
— NO to the App Store Accountability Act
— NO to the Parents Over Platforms Act
—NO “age verification” laws
—NO to digital ID systems
January 5, 2026 at 1:02 AM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
Congress is about to make a huge push into online ID verification, entrenching the power of big tech and mandating that they collect even MORE data on users. Mass surveillance/censorship laws are being framed as “child safety” but they’re really abt at removing LGBTQ ppl, repro justice info, etc.
January 5, 2026 at 1:00 AM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
This was flagged by @brynntannehill.bsky.social back in 2023.

"Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology... has no claim to First Amendment protection. ...

Telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.”
The GOP Has a Master Plan to Criminalize Being Trans - Dame Magazine
Most people aren’t aware of Project 2025, or its playbook, “Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise”—but you need to be. In stark terms, Project 2025 reveals the conservatives’ plan to enact ...
www.damemagazine.com
December 31, 2025 at 8:03 PM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
as I read it, it would effectively ban Google from showing "sexual material harmful to minors" in search.

Listings for porn sites, OF creators on X, Amazon results for books like Beloved and Fun Home, trans health services, drag clips, Wikipedia pages on BDSM ... all magically disappeared.
Oklahoma bill barring drag performances harmful to minors advances out of committee • Oklahoma Voice
State senators on Tuesday greenlighted a controversial bill that could make Oklahoma the latest state to attempt to ban children from watching drag and cabaret performances deemed harmful to minors.
oklahomavoice.com
December 31, 2025 at 8:00 PM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
Here's the phrase as used in Blackburn's "The Republic Unifying Meritocratic Performance Advancing Machine Intelligence by Eliminating Regulatory Interstate Chaos Across American Industry (TRUMP AMERICA AI) Act"

So far, they've released just a summary. We'll wait on actual language but
December 31, 2025 at 7:58 PM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
Across the country, the phrase "material harmful to minors" is being used to pull books off of library shelves, harass Pride retailers, ban graphic novels and threaten trans services.

It's vague and easily twisted (by state AGs, the FTC, Moms for Liberty) to chill or censor speech they don't like.
When Arizona's "porn" age-verification bill goes into effect next week, conservative parents will be able to sue websites offering transgender education, says the author of the bill.

"Fight it out in court."

www.yourvalley.net/stories/ariz...
December 31, 2025 at 7:34 PM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
This, of course, is not Blackburn's first attempt at blocking LGBTQ+ content under the guise of protecting children. Back in 2023, she said that KOSA should be used for “protecting minor children from the transgender in this culture”

www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-...
December 31, 2025 at 7:26 PM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
This is a Marsha Blackburn Joint, so imagine the worst, broadest interpretation of the law you can and double it.

There's tons of badness here, as @enbrown.bsky.social and @mmasnick.bsky.social detail, but banning sex and gender related content from "systemically important" platforms is a doozy.
Marsha Blackburn Bundles Every Bad Tech Bill Into One, Slaps Trump’s Name On It
Fourteen years ago, right after the FCC issued its order on net neutrality, Marsha Blackburn flipped out and released a video talking (misleadingly!) about how wonderful Facebook and Twitter were a…
www.techdirt.com
December 31, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
A little-noticed provision in the TRUMP AI Act would ban big tech platforms, including ostensibly Google, from distributing "sexual material harmful to minors" — a phrase routinely used by conservatives to ban not only porn, but sex ed, LGBTQ literature and repro rights resources.
The TRUMP AMERICA AI Act is every bit as bad as you would expect. Maybe worse.
Sen. Marsha Blackburn’s latest is an anti-tech omnibus, combining years' worth of dangerous policy ideas into one big, bad bill.
reason.com
December 31, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
Remember, Marsha Blackburn introduced KOSA to “stop the transgender in our culture.”

KOSA is a tool to bludgeon free expression and erase LGTBQ people.
It is not about kids safety at all.
December 23, 2025 at 6:41 PM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
#savespeech #stopKOSA #ProtectSection230

The Bill:
- Adds a ban on all state based legislation on AI.
- Reforms Section 230 by adding a "Bad Samaritan" section.
- Wants "duty of care" on sites, AI or not(KOSA)

Call & yell at reps. Vote Blackburn out.

www.congress.gov/members/find...
December 23, 2025 at 6:41 AM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
#savespeech #stopKOSA #ProtectSection230

Apparently I can't go one fucking day on my week break without politicians being pieces of shit & anti-free internet.

Marsha Blackburn introduced a bill with Trump's name on it.

www.techdirt.com/2025/12/22/m...

www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/12/tech...
Marsha Blackburn Bundles Every Bad Tech Bill Into One, Slaps Trump’s Name On It
Fourteen years ago, right after the FCC issued its order on net neutrality, Marsha Blackburn flipped out and released a video talking (misleadingly!) about how wonderful Facebook and Twitter were a…
www.techdirt.com
December 23, 2025 at 6:41 AM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
Reminding everyone for no particular reason that Section 230 is one of the last things standing between free speech online and Trump having control over everything you see and say on the internet
December 18, 2025 at 10:28 PM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
Here's the Senators cosponsoring new S.3546 to FULLY REPEAL SECTION 230 www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...

@durbin.senate.gov (D-IL)
Grassley (R-IA)
@whitehouse.senate.gov (D-RI)
Hawley (R-MO)
@klobuchar.senate.gov
Blackburn (R-TN)
@blumenthal.senate.gov (D-CT)
Moody (R-FL)
@welch.senate.gov (D-VT)
December 18, 2025 at 10:01 PM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
Oh and online protest movements like @50501movement.bsky.social and #NoKings would be quickly wiped off of social media by censorious lawsuits.

Some of the organizers of the @teslatakedown.com protests wrote a letter about this earlier this year.

www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
Analysis | ‘Tesla Takedown’ organizers ask Democrats to protect Section 230
Social media’s liability shield is gaining support on the left amid a bipartisan push to rethink or repeal it.
www.washingtonpost.com
December 18, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
It's so embarassing to see so-called progressives like @amyklobuchar.com and @senpeterwelch.govpeeps.us on this list.

Blowing up Section 230 would be devastating for abortion access

www.wired.com/story/sectio...

It would harm LGBTQ communities

www.teenvogue.com/story/some-d...
Section 230 Is a Last Line of Defense for Abortion Speech Online
Dobbs should be a wake-up call for anyone seeking to undercut the immunity protections afforded by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
www.wired.com
December 18, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
NEW: They kept saying they were gonna do it and now they've done it

A group of clowns (Senators) have introduced a bill to FULLY REPEAL Section 230.

No reform, no replacement, just utter destruction of all online free speech.

We can't let this happen. Share & take action

www.badinternetbills.com
Bad Internet Bills
All of the bad internet bills. One website.
www.badinternetbills.com
December 18, 2025 at 7:37 PM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
Heads up: 'Sunset To Reform Section 230 Act'(H.R. 6746) has been introduced in the house. its sole goal is to repeal section 230

Its only introduced, so we dont yet know how actually threatening it is, but keep this in mind and advocate for sec 230 to your reps

www.govtrack.us/congress/bil...
December 17, 2025 at 8:58 PM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
As it's been pointed out, age verification laws getting permablocked in Louisiana, Arkansas and Ohio directly contradicts the narrative that KOSA et al is popular, which its congressional supporters are desperately claiming

If we push it could unravel completely, but we all *have* to keep pushing
December 16, 2025 at 2:27 AM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
How can you argue federal AV laws are good when at the state level we're seeing real pushback and even seeing AV legislation repealed/blocked?

They want you to think its a consensus, its inevitable.

Its not. Fight like its not!
December 16, 2025 at 1:41 AM
Reposted by HopelessSeeker77
I really want to emphasize that this is a winnable fight, but everyone has to chip in in order to do so! Please dont sit it out expecting others to stand in your place!

And dont ignore local/state level stuff! As these state laws get overturned, the narrative behind the Fed ones lose steam!
#SaveSpeech

Netchoice won their legal battle against Age verification in louisiana! This follows similar rulings in AK and OH!

This is huge!

These laws can be stopped, they can be overturned. Do not give in to dooming! Keep calling your reps and support orgs that fight these laws in court!
NetChoice Wins Permanent Block of Louisiana Age Verification Law, Protecting Free Speech and Parental Rights - NetChoice
BATON ROUGE, La.—Today, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana granted NetChoice’s motion for summary judgment in NetChoice v. Murrill, striking down Louisiana’s Act 456. The cou...
netchoice.org
December 16, 2025 at 1:39 AM