Haley Norris
@hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
570 followers 360 following 670 posts
*Views are my own* | Policy Analyst @americanprogress.bsky.social | Political Scientist | Queer | Trans | AuDHD | I have no more hobbies hvnorris.com (they/them) Moderator of LGBTQ Politics Feed
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
I envy my dog who has no idea what just happened.
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
Nearly forgot to celebrate int'l lesbian day!

Jk, I'm always celebrating being a lesbian.
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
And let's just transpose that over congressional districts/voter registration...........
pollsandvotes.bsky.social
Informative map of where Obamacare/ACA enrollment grew the most from 2020-2025. From Wall Street Journal. Story, no paywall. www.wsj.com/health/healt...
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
One thing I learned working on the hill is that A LOT of states depend on H-1B for their medical staff. This puts entire communities at risk because they won't have providers.
kreighbaum.bsky.social
President Trump’s surprise proclamation slapping new H-1B workers with a $100,000 fee jolted the tech industry.

The first legal challenge to the fee though didn’t come from Silicon Valley, but a coalition of healthcare, education, and religious employers.

#H1Bvisa #immigration #healthcare #tech
H-1B $100,000 Fee Lawsuit Signals Labor Disruptions Beyond Tech
The first legal challenge to President Donald Trump’s $100,000 fee for new H-1B workers was launched by a coalition of employers well outside of Silicon Valley, showcasing the effects the steep new co...
news.bloomberglaw.com
Reposted by Haley Norris
sydkneeb.bsky.social
It's jarring for Miller to admit they want plenary authority but this isn't new. They've been trying to do this since jan 20. And the co-branches are letting them! Congress relegated their checks and balances via their inaction and SCOTUS has given the greenlight. why does no one have a backbone?!
Reposted by Haley Norris
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
"...when it came time for ADF to show that this law was harming children by preventing them from getting the services that they wanted, they had to go to Reddit, and they had to quote anonymous posts...that were allegedly written by minors who sought out conversion therapy and couldn’t find it."
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
If you're wondering why standing kept coming up in oral argument yesterday, it's probably because of this:

slate.com/news-and-pol...
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
As always, Chris's analysis gets to the root of the problem.

"It was a sharp lesson in how much power the court has in resolving cases through definitions — while claiming to stay out of the political and policy debates."
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
“The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared likely to strike down Colorado’s ban on conversion therapy by licensed therapists practiced on minors — a ruling that could affect similar laws in nearly half the country and make life more difficult for LGBTQ children at an already perilous time.”
Supreme Court likely to strike down Colorado's conversion therapy ban
A lesson in how defining the case often resolves the case.
www.lawdork.com
Reposted by Haley Norris
motherjones.com
"We're going to do whatever it takes to keep her safe."

How families are fighting to survive Trump's war on transgender kids
"We're going to do whatever it takes to keep her safe"
How families are fighting to survive Trump's war on transgender kids
www.motherjones.com
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
I'm continuing to process everything we heard yesterday. But this exchange between KBJ and the DOJ's lawyer is sticking with me. (page 54 of the transcript).
www.supremecourt.gov/oral_argumen...
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
Something that did not come up during the arguments today, but that I can't stop thinking about, is the 'bans on bans' 11th circuit case (Otto-southern states in yellow). That case was about a local ordinance, not a state law. It might seem like a small difference but it really, really matters.
Reposted by Haley Norris
americanprogress.bsky.social
Do you want corporate and dark money out of politics? CAP’s @thmoore.bsky.social is hosting a live Reddit AMA in r/Politics on October 8, at 11:30 am ET to answer your questions about CAP's bold new strategy that states can use to render Citizens United irrelevant: www.reddit.com/r/politics/
A photograph of Tom Moore smiling while holding a sheet of white paper against a red brick wall. The paper is a verification photo for a Reddit Ask Me Anything (AMA) session. The paper has the Reddit logo and text that reads: "reddit AMA Tom Moore u/TomMooreID October 8 11:30 AM ET".
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
Chiles v Salazar is the clearest example that anti-trans fights are about all LGBTQI people. A lot of those conversion therapy bans were passed to regulate sexual orientation CT. Just bc they got the court’s attention by focusing on gender identity today, doesn’t mean their goal isn’t more broad.
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
Open enrollment obviously impacts people whose only coverage option is ACA insurance. But it also impacts people who are offered expensive employer-sponsored plans who will need to do the math to determine if ACA fits their budget. No one can do this until the subsidies are finalized.
Reposted by Haley Norris
jayapal.house.gov
Mike Johnson wants to kick the can down the road when it comes to addressing skyrocketing premiums — but this is a crisis right now.

NOW is the time to negotiate to lower costs — not after millions have been kicked off their health care.
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
I always love when hypotheticals become a corner stone of a legal argument (sarcasm).
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
ADF literally just asked for a randomized control trial to test if conversion therapy harms kids in a supreme court oral argument.
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
Quick reaction to the oral argument in Chiles: 90% of trans kids do NOT "desist" or "detransition" as the ADF's lawyer claimed. Their moral argument rests on the claim that conversion therapy "helps kids" when all of the evidence shows the exact opposite.
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
Both Thomas and Alito were highly skeptical of all the bans--unsurprising because in the past both of them wanted to grant cert to previous cases on these bans.
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
As always, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson coming with the my favorite questions.
Reposted by Haley Norris
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Off to SCOTUS for the conversion therapy ban arguments. Subscribe to Law Dork, where I’ll have a full report: www.lawdork.com
Chris with a tie, iced americano, and a good spirit in spite of the horrors.
Reposted by Haley Norris
cwnewser.bsky.social
Covering oral arguments inside the Supreme
Court today in the case of Chiles v. Salazar, where the justices will decide whether the practice of so-called “conversion therapy” (which is akin to torture) can remain banned in states across the country.
hvnorrisphd.bsky.social
If you're just now hearing about this case, you can follow the usual legal commentators, reporters, and read up on conversion "therapy" from LGBTQI+ advocacy groups.
www.thetrevorproject.org/conversion-t...
www.mapresearch.org/2025-convers...