I recall seeing the parents of some kids at school having one, practically cosmopolitan in 1992 Birmingham!

AI isn’t a catch word for all that’s bad. Machine Learning happens in all sorts of tools now to improve them.

This is not specialist railway engineering journalism, its fact checking.

Newsrooms have to develop and test verification technology in a world of deepfakes. It’s sadly needed in this age of potential digital arms races. Ok this is a mundane bridge - I can foresee total recreations of world leaders/trusted faces down the line. Broadcasters need authentication mechanisms.

My point stands.

It’s gone midnight and they are on a nightshift in a news room, I think this is a little unfair given they were verifying.

I think if I was in the McSweeney job I’d still have not put it in the manifesto, but I equally know how unequally a lot of the press uphold manifesto’s dependent upon the party, as well as, well, much else. (I can’t recall if Johnson’s 2019 manifesto made it past 3 pages of A4, v detail light.)

I think to put it simply they’d have been radically better off without that manifesto pledge. Perhaps it was the same 1997 “no complacency” after 1992?

Sad state of the paper I used to read every evening as a kid growing up as the Evening Mail.

So at the risk of being all serious and boring, what’s the answer?

How so? Not my take tbh

I’m starting to fall in line behind this: bsky.app/profile/anon...

I have decided to not acknowledge this series due to its antisocial working hours…

Steve Smith describing Pat Cummins as “an absolute weapon”, truly two nations divided by a common language.

😀

What form do you feel it should take?

Twice a day I have this. Minimum, daily since the brain tumour