Jacob Bogage
@jacobbogage.bsky.social
20K followers 550 following 1K posts
White House + econ policy @washingtonpost.com. Bad golfer. [email protected]. Signal: jacobbogage.87.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
jacobbogage.bsky.social
⚡ The Trump admin's budget office is arguing that furloughed workers are not entitled to backpay after the shutdown ends.

We got the memo laying out their case. Here it is.

Read more (gift link): wapo.st/47dbJEe
Purpose
You have requested my legal opinion regarding whether Congress, in an appropriations Act ending the current lapse in appropriations, would have to appropriate funds specifically for the retroactive pay of furloughed Federal employees’ salaries, or whether the 2019 amendments to the Antideficiency Act (ADA) make such action legally unnecessary. 
Summary

The 2019 amendments to the ADA are not self-executing. Therefore, for retroactive pay to be provided to furloughed employees, the appropriations Act ending the lapse in appropriation must specifically provide an appropriation for such purpose. 
Discussion
The Government Employee Fair Treatment Act of 2019 (Public Law 116-1) and the Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019 (Public Law 116-5) (collectively referred to herein as “GEFTA”) were enacted during the 2019 lapse in appropriations. Public Law 116-5 was also the law that ended that lapse in appropriations. These two laws amended the Antideficiency Act to read:
Each employee of the United States Government or of a District of Columbia public employer furloughed as a result of a covered lapse in appropriations shall be paid for the period of the lapse in appropriations, and each excepted employee who is required to perform work during a covered lapse in appropriations shall be paid for such work, at the employee's standard rate of pay, at the earliest date possible after the lapse in appropriations ends, regardless of scheduled pay dates, and subject to the enactment of appropriations Acts ending the lapse.

31 U.S.C. § 1341(c)(2) (emphasis added).
When GEFTA was enacted, it stated that furloughed employees “shall be paid for the period of the lapse in appropriations . . . at the earliest date possible after the lapse in appropriations ends.” 31 U.S.C. § 1341(c)(2) (as added by GEFTA sec. 2). Subsequently, Public Law 116-5 further amended § 1341(c)(2) to specify that the advance promise of post-lapse payments is “subject to the enactment of appropriations Acts ending the lapse.”
Excepted employees are required to work during a lapse, and therefore the government incurs binding legal obligations for their salaries which must be paid once an Act providing appropriations for those salaries is enacted. In contrast, the government does not incur obligations for furloughed employees’ salaries, because they are not performing services for the government while furloughed. “The term ‘obligation’ has a well-understood meaning in fiscal law[.]” The Anti-Deficiency Act Implications of Consent by Government Employees to Online Terms of Service Agreements Containing Open-Ended Indemnification Clauses, 36 Op. O.L.C. _, at *7 (Mar. 27, 2012). It means a “‘definite commitment that creates a legal liability of the government for the payment of goods and services ordered or received, or a legal duty on the part of the United States that could mature into a legal liability by virtue of actions on the part of the other party beyond the control of the United States.’” Id. (quoting Gov’t Accountability Office, GAO-05-734SP, A Glossary of Terms Used in the Federal Budget Process 70 (2005)); see also 2 Gov’t Accountability Office, Principles of Federal Appropriations Law 7-3 to 7-4 (3d ed. 2006). 
GEFTA’s amendments to the ADA did nothing to create an obligation on the part of the governme… This conclusion is not only the best interpretation of the text of GEFTA, it is also the most practical and coherent one. To conclude that GEFTA provides an automatic appropriation for the salaries of furloughed workers upon enactment of an appropriations Act ending the lapse would effectively collapse the distinction between excepted and furloughed employees. If payment pursuant to GEFTA were guaranteed, agencies could end all furloughs, because to do so would not result in the government incurring additional obligations. Yet the statute clearly maintains (and is premised upon) the distinction between furloughed and excepted employees, and we must give meaning to such distinction. 
	Finally, the conclusion here is supported by the facts surrounding the enactment of GEFTA. When GEFTA was enacted, neither OMB nor the Congressional Budget Office scored it as mandatory spending, demonstrating that both the contemporaneous Congress and Executive Branch did not understand GEFTA to be creating an obligation. Moreover, as noted above, Public Law 116-5 not only amended § 1341(c)(2) to add the phrase, “subject to the enactment of appropriations Acts ending the lapse” but also was the very appropriations Act that ended the 2019 lapse, as contemplated by GEFTA. Yet in that Act Congress expressly included an appropriation for furloughed employees’ back-pay that stated, “Amounts made available in this Act for personnel pay, allowances, and benefits in each department and agency shall be available for obligations incurred pursuant to subsection (c) of section 1341 of title 31, United States Code.” Public Law 116-5, § 101(2) (amending the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019 (division C of Public Law 115–245)). This shows that Congress believed that GEFTA was not self-executing, and that an appropriations Act that ended the lapse in appropriations but that was silent as to whether it provided funds for furloughed employees’ back pay would not be sufficient to provide such payments.…
jacobbogage.bsky.social
Republicans were so concerned that their own "One Big Beautiful Bill" cut Medicare too much that they created a $50 billion bailout fund for rural hospitals they felt could collapse.
atrupar.com
Mike Johnson: "Let me look right into the camera and tell you very clearly: Republicans are the ones concerned about healthcare. Republicans are the party working around the clock everyday to fix healthcare. This is not talking points for us: we've done it."
jacobbogage.bsky.social
Not stopping. They could get paid? Large parts of DHS are getting funded through the “One Big Beautiful Bill.”
amybogart.bsky.social
Will ICE raids stop? Will they still get paid? National Guard troops sent to various cities?
jacobbogage.bsky.social
You know, that’s a good question. I’m gonna get an answer on that today.
wtjoseph.bsky.social
Not even Article III judges?
jacobbogage.bsky.social
There’s a difference between exempt from closure and paying employees. By law, no money can be drawn from the Treasury during a shutdown.

If agencies have money, in some cases, they can spend those. Otherwise, essential functions stay open without spending authority. And they’re not paying anyone.
johngordon.bsky.social
Usually VHA finds a way to pay staff.
jacobbogage.bsky.social
The only people getting paid are members of Congress and the president, and that’s because their compensation is required by the Constitution. Nobody else gets paid during a shutdown.
uncivil.work
does dog killer kristi noem still get paid while complaining that dhs kidnappers don't
jacobbogage.bsky.social
Airport should be pretty normal. But remember none of the government people there will be getting paid. So try to be extra patient and nice.
vineeta.bsky.social
Thanks. This is good stuff. I’m flying next week. What can I expect at airports?
jacobbogage.bsky.social
Lightning round of what’s closed and what’s open during this government shutdown.

Got questions?

Drop them in the replies and I’ll work to answer them through the day.
jacobbogage.bsky.social
👀 Just Now -- President Trump in the Oval Office said a government shutdown gives his administration the power to cut benefit programs, which include Social Security and Medicare.

www.washingtonpost.com/business/202...
“We can do things during the shutdown that are irreversible, that are bad for them, and irreversible by them, like cutting vast numbers of people out, cutting things that they like, cutting programs that they like. And, you all know Russell Vought. He’s become very popular recently because he can trim the budget to a level that you couldn't do any other way. So they're taking a risk by having a shutdown. Because of the shutdown, we can do things medically and other ways, including benefits. We can cut large numbers of people. We don't want to do that, but we don't want fraud, waste and abuse.”
jacobbogage.bsky.social
Wow, the fourth shutdown of Trump's two terms. I was wrong! My bad!
jacobbogage.bsky.social
We're hours away from a government shutdown -- it'll be the first since 2018 and the third of Trump's two terms.

Here's our video FAQ + more info in the link.

Got other questions? I'll work through them in the replies the rest of the day.

wapo.st/4o2usrT
jacobbogage.bsky.social
Hey man, if you don’t like the story, that’s okay. I wish you did, but there’s nothing I can do about that. But I’ve got better things to do than argue with someone on the internet who is wrong. I hope you have a great Sunday.
jacobbogage.bsky.social
Would you prefer to know what's happening, or would you prefer to hear from people who make you feel good?
jacobbogage.bsky.social
I’m writing a story about Trump’s plans. These people know what those plans are and advise him. So yeah, that’s a really accurate picture.
jacobbogage.bsky.social
Solid point. Will keep this in mind. Thank you!
emipsaloquitur.bsky.social
Not so much a question as a request for coverage: wish the coverage of the OPM hostage memo would make clear legally the administration can do mass firings whenever they want as long as they follow basic RIF procedures. No shutdown needed. Makes it clear the memo is a bluff.
jacobbogage.bsky.social
Once again, I did not expect yall to have so many (good) thoughts/questions.

I’ll work through these throughout the day! And keep em coming!
jacobbogage.bsky.social
I imagine so? But truly, the generals have no idea what this meeting is about. And they’re super pissed off about it, per my WaPo colleagues who I accosted about this in the newsroom yesterday.

Great thing about working with brilliant people — you can walk by their desk and hit them up for info!
nintyfan1991.bsky.social
Pete Hegseth is doing a secret meeting with hundreds of generals around the time of a shut down. Correlation, probably?
jacobbogage.bsky.social
Dems are obsessive over saying they “put up a fight” against Trump.

There’s real concern among some, though, that they walked into a trap.

If ACA subsidies get extended, yes, Rs will take credit, because Rs have the majority.

And Rs desperately need to get right on health care with swing voters.
laurarbelin.bsky.social
What is the endgame for Democrats?
If Republicans agree to extend the ACA subsidies until after the 2026 elections, that actually helps the GOP. Would Dems claim victory and move on?
Clearly Republicans will never agree to roll back the Medicaid cuts.
jacobbogage.bsky.social
Dems say they are looking at polling that show Trump will own the blame for the shutdown.

Rs say they’ve got polling that Dems will take the blame.

Educated guess here: Folks are polling their base. Dems are petrified of losing their base over this shutdown like they did in March.
paradigm317.bsky.social
Let it all burn down for all I care

Gop owns every inch of this shutdown
jacobbogage.bsky.social
I try to stay away from predictions. I’ll say this: Prepare for this to last a while.

Shutdown in Trump’s first term went 34 days.

Dems don’t see an off ramp to get out of this without significant political pain.

Trump and Rs are not interested in doing anything bipartisan.

It’s a toxic brew.
simonlester.com
With both sides looking so dug in at the moment, what's your prediction for how long this shutdown lasts?
jacobbogage.bsky.social
And if there’s things we ought to know, you can reach me securely on Signal:
Signal Messenger Contact
Follow this link to message on Signal.
signal.me
jacobbogage.bsky.social
A government shutdown is days away. And @rbeggin.bsky.social and I obsessing over it.

What do you want do want to know?

Will do my best to respond throughout the day.