Jérôme Deyris
@jdeyris.bsky.social
1.5K followers 430 following 72 posts
Political economy, post-doc at @SciencesPo_CEE - interested in central banks, finance and the climate crisis
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Jérôme Deyris
danmertens.bsky.social
Hi bsky people - if you care about how the EU seeks to fund all things "social-ecological transformation", which institutional architecture has emerged out of it, and why it is both contested and an unrealized promise: please have a look at our special issue on the politics of sustainable finance 👇
jeppjournal.bsky.social
🌱🪙 In their introduction to the Special Issue "Puzzling, powering, profiting: The politics of sustainable finance in Europe", editors
@danmertens.bsky.social and @nataschavanderzwan.bsky.social define EU sustainable finance & outline how best to analyse it 💡

🔗 www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Reposted by Jérôme Deyris
carbonnier.bsky.social
Séance d'envois presse... la date de sortie s'approche !
Reposted by Jérôme Deyris
kprodani.bsky.social
🚨New article🚨 Why has the promise of universal ownership been broken, as @benbraun.bsky.social has suggested?

Our argument: because the Big Three are hardly universal. They mainly invest in those that can insulate themselves from environmental harm - big tech & financials in the Global North.
🧵
Reposted by Jérôme Deyris
eollion.bsky.social
Tu te demandes si tu es sociologue, historienne ou économiste ? Tu veux tester tes connaissances sur les locutions latines préférées de Bourdieu, ou connaître la différence entre M. Mauss et K. Moss ? Camille François et Altaïr Desprès ont les réponses à ces questions. Version papier seulement.
Reposted by Jérôme Deyris
gallegre.bsky.social
Ce matin sur Inter, Villeroy de Galhau, gouverneur de la BdF, a joué sur les deux tableaux de l'expert indépendant qui donne en réalité son avis personnel. C'est de bonne guerre (?), mais on a le droit de lui répondre.
Reposted by Jérôme Deyris
vtiberj.bsky.social
Ce que le discours anti-immigré de Starmer produit chez les électeurs anglais
1) baisse des intentions de vote Labour chez leurs propres électeurs
2) aucun gain chez les électeurs de Farage
Reposted by Jérôme Deyris
proufos.bsky.social
Actually, research has also challenged the negative correlation between CBI and inflation as a case of confusing cause and effect. CBI is not the *cause* of low inflation. CBI is the *consequence* of a pre-existing sociopolitical consensus on low inflation promoted after the 1970s stagflation.
Reposted by Jérôme Deyris
james7jackson.bsky.social
NEW PUBLICATION - The Great Dane @mathiaslarsen.bsky.social Larsen and I review the differing concepts of state-led approaches to the green transition over the past two decades. We attempt to provide some conceptual coherence to the debate. The article is Open Access.
Reposted by Jérôme Deyris
antonintd.bsky.social
En avant première, le programme du séminaire "action publique" que je co-anime avec les collègues de @univ-spn.bsky.social. Au programme, de supers séances sur des thèmes d'actualité comme le mal-logement, les socialisations enfantines ou l'actualité des partis et mouvements politiques.
Reposted by Jérôme Deyris
sciencespo-cee.bsky.social
Central bankers as neutral, science-based policymakers? A new study in @jcms-eu.bsky.social co-authored by @jdeyris.bsky.social and Matthias Thiemann shows that ECB governors, depending on the inflation "season", make selective use of data, theories and indicators to adapt to national preferences. ⤵️
Reposted by Jérôme Deyris
ronjasczepanski.bsky.social
Ever asked yourself how to detect and extract social groups from texts with computational social science? @haukelicht.bsky.social and me have a solution for you out at @bjpols.bsky.social. You can also find the pre-trained models on huggingface!
bjpols.bsky.social
NEW -

Detecting Group Mentions in Political Rhetoric A Supervised Learning Approach - cup.org/45WZppQ

- @haukelicht.bsky.social & @ronjasczepanski.bsky.social

#OpenAccess
BJPolS Abstract discussing a social science research method that uses text analysis for understanding group language patterns and political leanings, mentioning the use of British articles and generating new empirical insights.
Reposted by Jérôme Deyris
clemfon.bsky.social
Since the start of von der Leyen's second mandate, EU sustainable finance norms face intense dismantling pressures. My new @JEPP article shows this started years ago when the fossil fuel industry “woke up” to the EU Taxonomy. 🧵 #EUTaxonomy #SustainableFinance👇 1/10
Reposted by Jérôme Deyris
benbraun.bsky.social
Migrating birds, selective blindness, strategic skepticism, weaponized uncertainty – this paper has it all. Do give it a read, it's excellent work.
jdeyris.bsky.social
But there is a silver lining: the fact that the ECB Governing Council houses both groups may counterbalance these individual biases and avoid herd behavior...

... At least as long as the balance of power between the two groups remains 🕊️⚖️🦅
jdeyris.bsky.social
This also explains why technocratic institutions' reputation management strategies appear less coherent than anticipated.
Individual central bankers aren't just cultivating their institution's legitimacy, but also trying to make their own monetary policy preferences prevail.
jdeyris.bsky.social
This questions the "depoliticization" and "scientization" of central banks:
When central bankers selectively respond to data based on whether it supports their preferences, and mobilize theories strategically rather than consistently, they function more as skilled advocates than neutral technocrats.
jdeyris.bsky.social
In sum, central bankers from both camps displayed:
📍 Selective blindness (cherry-picking data)
📍 Strategic skepticism (questioning theories when they become inconvenient)
📍 Weaponized uncertainty (using uncertainty to justify preferred action/inaction)
jdeyris.bsky.social
When inflation came back (2021-2023), attitudes reversed. The doves adopted the data, theories, and principles they had rejected in previous years when they were used by the hawks... And the hawks did the same, from inflation data to monetary policy principles.

See e.g. on inflation expectations
jdeyris.bsky.social
By contrast, hawks highlighted in their speeches the supply-side drivers of inflation, questioned the very relevance of inflation expectations, warned of the many and dangerous side effects of quantitative easing, and argued that uncertainty called for humility and patience.
jdeyris.bsky.social
In deflation times (2014-2017), doves wanted to push for bold accommodative action. They highlighted the demand-side drivers of deflation, warned of de-anchoring inflation expectations, insisted on "price stability first", and called for bold action to counter uncertainty.
jdeyris.bsky.social
While having opposed preferences, both camps display similar rhetorical strategies: depending on the "inflation season", they mobilize the data, theories and policy principles that help them make their preferences prevail...

... Even when it means being time-inconsistent!
jdeyris.bsky.social
In this paper, we study speeches from the 5 main Eurosystem central banks (2014-2023) and document the rhetorical strategies of two camps:

🕊️ Doves (that favor accommodative monetary policy), from 🇪🇸and 🇮🇹
🦅 Hawks (that champion higher interest rates), from 🇩🇪and 🇳🇱