Lots of US Army people talking about bringing back 1940/41 cross-Compo division/corps maneuvers to the present day.

*we literally mobilized primarily rural based NG divisions first to avoid the damage to the national economy*

While fighting a war may be far more expensive than preparing for one, let’s not overlook how expensive simply preparing for one is and the amount of manpower Ukraine could financially afford to mobilize. Such forces being presumably reservists which would of course pull from the national economy.

War is a continuation of politics or something

AF legal also probably advised getting him out as quickly as possible under Article 134 and the let civilian courts handle the rest

People made fun of the Army for this but if we’re being serious about war being more complex at all levels with new technologies and problems which requires the best people, an honest look at our education system at large should have told you this was inevitable

www.army.mil/article-amp/...

Damn. Yeah usually I catch autocorrect - didn’t that time. May have been still waking up while typing

Supporting elements (always has been, but this challenge/demand has only increased now)

Typical Recon, jamming, CUAS, and strike support roles. Plus normal artillery, infantry, and engineers. See Kursk incursion

If we confine examination of combined arms narrowly to achieving success with the tank against a modern prepared defense, the problem is less the tank and more its

Both for protection and success. Arguably and this is why sure the Leopard 2a6 and Abrams are the preferred tank pretty much any semi modern tank is doing fine in Ukraine *if* it is supported by the rest of the team which is now heavily weighted towards drone based fulfillment/enhancement of

Associated and this was both military types, UAF propagandists, and weapons designers to go oh don’t worry this newer tank model will be the critical weapon or solve this weakness.

Which while not entirely wrong, obscures the degree to which the tank operates as part of the combined arms team

The U.S., Britain, and Germany all retooled their armored divisions after initial combat to include higher infantry proportions

of the conversation and the need for the U.S. Army to do any serious study

There were also bangers like the UAF just needs to mass more (everytime they mass they got hit genius) a

And

Why are the UAF leading with infantry then tanks, it’s not the job of the tank to support the infantry (wrong)

In some of the debates that appeared from AUG 22-DEC 23 which saw Russian and Ukraine attempt offensives against various levels of hasty or prepared defenses it seemed a lot of US Army analysis was focused on well they didn’t do combined arms and then everyone nodded their head and that was the end