Josh C.
@joshcray.bsky.social
Reposted by Josh C.
Termination notices going out this afternoon to more than 300 employees of the National Cancer Institute. Access likely ends today. Four weeks paid leave and that’s it.
Strong power move for Team Cancer.
Strong power move for Team Cancer.
February 14, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Termination notices going out this afternoon to more than 300 employees of the National Cancer Institute. Access likely ends today. Four weeks paid leave and that’s it.
Strong power move for Team Cancer.
Strong power move for Team Cancer.
Reposted by Josh C.
Here are the 25 institutions that receive the most NIH funding (98% of HHS is NIH). Basically, they're large schools with large hospitals. They receive 50% of all NIH funding.
Source: ncses.nsf.gov/surveys/fede... (table 26)
(Not going to do a whole thread but thought folks might be interested.)
Source: ncses.nsf.gov/surveys/fede... (table 26)
(Not going to do a whole thread but thought folks might be interested.)
February 8, 2025 at 3:20 PM
Here are the 25 institutions that receive the most NIH funding (98% of HHS is NIH). Basically, they're large schools with large hospitals. They receive 50% of all NIH funding.
Source: ncses.nsf.gov/surveys/fede... (table 26)
(Not going to do a whole thread but thought folks might be interested.)
Source: ncses.nsf.gov/surveys/fede... (table 26)
(Not going to do a whole thread but thought folks might be interested.)
Reposted by Josh C.
Executive wants to frame the NIH indirects cut as $4B in savings.
But given that NIH returns $2.5 on every $1 investment, this would actually cost US economy a net $6 BILLION (per year!). Not to mention the human costs of wrecking education and research sectors and the communities they serve.
But given that NIH returns $2.5 on every $1 investment, this would actually cost US economy a net $6 BILLION (per year!). Not to mention the human costs of wrecking education and research sectors and the communities they serve.
Direct Economic Contributions
NIH directly supports the economy through investments in research institutions and job formation.
www.nih.gov
February 8, 2025 at 3:08 AM
Executive wants to frame the NIH indirects cut as $4B in savings.
But given that NIH returns $2.5 on every $1 investment, this would actually cost US economy a net $6 BILLION (per year!). Not to mention the human costs of wrecking education and research sectors and the communities they serve.
But given that NIH returns $2.5 on every $1 investment, this would actually cost US economy a net $6 BILLION (per year!). Not to mention the human costs of wrecking education and research sectors and the communities they serve.
Since 2011, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has provided $19.7 billion in consumer relief.
This is money back into the pockets of everyday people like you and me.
How could anyone in the middle and lower classes support defunding this agency?
This is money back into the pockets of everyday people like you and me.
How could anyone in the middle and lower classes support defunding this agency?
February 9, 2025 at 12:04 AM
Since 2011, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has provided $19.7 billion in consumer relief.
This is money back into the pockets of everyday people like you and me.
How could anyone in the middle and lower classes support defunding this agency?
This is money back into the pockets of everyday people like you and me.
How could anyone in the middle and lower classes support defunding this agency?
How tf are we going to get through the next four years.
February 8, 2025 at 11:54 PM
How tf are we going to get through the next four years.
Reposted by Josh C.
Weak men cannot compromise. Weak men cannot build consensus. Weak men think that leadership means force. Weak men build nothing that lasts.
February 8, 2025 at 6:57 PM
Weak men cannot compromise. Weak men cannot build consensus. Weak men think that leadership means force. Weak men build nothing that lasts.
Following Trumps reinterpretation of the 14th Amendment, I am intrigued to see how the courts will argue against United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).
With the SCOTUS conservative super majority it’s safe to say that we will see a gross misinterpretation of past precedent.
With the SCOTUS conservative super majority it’s safe to say that we will see a gross misinterpretation of past precedent.
January 22, 2025 at 3:57 AM
Following Trumps reinterpretation of the 14th Amendment, I am intrigued to see how the courts will argue against United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).
With the SCOTUS conservative super majority it’s safe to say that we will see a gross misinterpretation of past precedent.
With the SCOTUS conservative super majority it’s safe to say that we will see a gross misinterpretation of past precedent.
Reposted by Josh C.
Only day 1 of 2025 btw
January 2, 2025 at 1:07 AM
Only day 1 of 2025 btw
Reposted by Josh C.
Where will our communities exist once we have quantum computers solving all our issue?
January 3, 2025 at 7:17 PM
Where will our communities exist once we have quantum computers solving all our issue?
Reposted by Josh C.
Fox News talking about Luigi Mangione, but make the footage Kyle Rittenhouse
December 11, 2024 at 11:06 PM
Fox News talking about Luigi Mangione, but make the footage Kyle Rittenhouse
Reposted by Josh C.
Assassin of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson wrote "deny", "defend" and "depose" on bullet casings.
December 5, 2024 at 4:50 PM
Assassin of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson wrote "deny", "defend" and "depose" on bullet casings.
Reposted by Josh C.
Trump cabinet vetting process
November 13, 2024 at 7:52 PM
Trump cabinet vetting process
Reposted by Josh C.
trump will be the next reagan in the sense that in 30 years every time you notice some horrible defect in society you'll do some quick research and trace it back to trump
November 11, 2024 at 1:40 PM
trump will be the next reagan in the sense that in 30 years every time you notice some horrible defect in society you'll do some quick research and trace it back to trump
Reposted by Josh C.
