Julia Piaskowski
banner
jpiaskowski.bsky.social
Julia Piaskowski
@jpiaskowski.bsky.social
I wish I could heart this more than once. It's exactly what I needed to hear.
November 10, 2025 at 11:54 PM
sorry, just visited your page and see you are shitposter! did not realize, will course correct.
November 10, 2025 at 4:28 PM
LOL no, they have no idea what they are doing. Advanced degrees and weed scientists are not a scam - those years of knowledge and experience mean something.
November 10, 2025 at 4:14 PM
In Idaho, the opposite seems true. People don't see it here, but believe that the rest of the country is different.
November 9, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Do you think organizing around this is useful? I'm trying to clarify if you mean this won't happen under the current political class or if it's not a worthwhile thing overall.
November 9, 2025 at 6:39 PM
these numbers are common among the right (I've heard "30 million" under Biden). Hard to tell where this info originated exactly, perhaps tracking back to a Marco Rubio interview. I'm unsettled by how many believe these numbers uncritically
November 9, 2025 at 6:23 PM
omg, that sweater
November 5, 2025 at 1:01 AM
"mystery arguments"! I see that quite a bit - nice to have name for it.
November 2, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Is it not a feasible business model to allow people to pay for single articles?
November 2, 2025 at 10:16 PM
It's in the news: github.com/rvlenth/emme...
github.com
November 2, 2025 at 5:34 AM
It's terrifying and exciting. Anyone written a guide to the challenges of taking up a legacy package? Others have been through this (@bbolker.bsky.social comes to mind, and surely there are others)
November 1, 2025 at 6:52 PM
sounds and looks like quackgrass
October 30, 2025 at 5:22 AM
yeah, that's what it looks like
October 30, 2025 at 5:21 AM
Understood.
October 29, 2025 at 10:33 PM