Jörg Ankel-Peters
@jrgptrs.bsky.social
2K followers 280 following 180 posts
development & environmental economist. energy access, climate policy, research transparency, replication & meta-science. #FirstGen bit.ly/40e2aQj
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Jörg Ankel-Peters
greenprofgreen.bsky.social
Today is the day!!! Existential Politics is out in the world!

Read about why we’re doing climate policy wrong (too focused on measuring emissions) & what we should do instead (focus on $$ to constrain fossil asset owners & expand green asset owners). Just in time for #COP30.
Existential Politics
A new way to tackle the real politics of climate change through asset revaluation
press.princeton.edu
jrgptrs.bsky.social
New DP @i4replication.bsky.social : Meta-analysis on the price elasticity of heating and cooling energy demand. www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10...
jrgptrs.bsky.social
Natürlich ist das so, wie Sie sagen. Trotzdem ist es erheblich lokaler (was die Spürbarkeit angeht) als Emissionsvermeidung. Deshalb: man kann doch nicht den "Vibe Shift" wegreden, indem man auf lokale Anpassungsmaßnahmen verweist. Das ist am Problem vorbei argumentiert.
jrgptrs.bsky.social
Für Anpassung wird sich sowieso stets eine Mehrheit finden lassen. Die wirkt ja unmittelbar, und eben vor Ort. Der Vibe Shift betrifft die Emissionsvermeidung, und über die diesbzezügliche Regulation entscheiden keine Kommunen und keine entschlossenen Minderheiten. Sondern eben Mehrheiten.
jrgptrs.bsky.social
Mag sein, nur nützt sie dort nichts - es sei denn man argumentiert über sehr indirekte Effekte wie "Vorbildfunktion" oder "Machbarkeit demonstrieren". Die wesentliche Klimapolitik wird durch Regierungen gemacht. Und für die sind Mehrheiten entscheidend, nicht die Entschlossenheit weniger.
jrgptrs.bsky.social
Sprache mag subjektiv Realität schaffen, nur wird aus diesen Beispielen lokalen Engagements hier noch lange keine Klimapolitik. Und schonmal gar keine globale. In der Realität.
Reposted by Jörg Ankel-Peters
moritzdrupp.bsky.social
🌍📈 Paper “The Economics of Inequality and the Environment” out today in the Journal of Economic Literature @aeajournals.bsky.social, joint with Jasper Meya, Lutz Sager & Ulrike Kornek.

See short summary and PM by PIK linked below, and the paper here
👉 pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/...
Reposted by Jörg Ankel-Peters
frikknesje.bsky.social
New publication: Designing Carbon Pricing Policies Across the Globe with Robert Schmidt and @moritzdrupp.bsky.social in Environmental and Resource Economics!

We present the largest international expert survey on carbon pricing design (400+ participants, ~40 countries). Some highlights.
jrgptrs.bsky.social
Insights into Elsevier's business model. "Publishers trade off higher returns in the short run with maintaining prestige in the long run." And I even guess this long-term-prestige objective only applies to upper tier Elsevier journals like Energy Economics.
Reposted by Jörg Ankel-Peters
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
My article "Data is not available upon request" was published in Meta-Psychology. Very happy to see this out!
open.lnu.se/index.php/me...
LnuOpen | Meta-Psychology
open.lnu.se
jrgptrs.bsky.social
Das kann doch kein Zufall sein.
Reposted by Jörg Ankel-Peters
setienergy.bsky.social
EfD and SETI fellows, @jrgptrs.bsky.social
, Gunther Bensch, and Maximiliane Sievert have published two studies to advise an evaluation conducted by the German Institute for Development Evaluation (DEval)
@efdinitiative.bsky.social
#EnergyTransition

tinyurl.com/2pnwxztj
Studies reviewed the effectiveness of rural energy access programs
How effective are Germany’s energy access programs in Sub-Saharan Africa?
tinyurl.com
jrgptrs.bsky.social
At @i4replication.bsky.social it is our ambition to foster a replication culture in the social sciences – and we hence welcome if our approaches are replicated as well: Replication Games on using LLM in experiments, in Valencia and Oxford. talkingtomachines.org/projects/ime...
jrgptrs.bsky.social
In essence, virtually all replicated scholars imply that, unless the replication confirms their results. Is it fragility or really a lack of skills? We don't know, we are lacking a benchmark to judge. Harry Collins coined the term "experimenter's regress" for that paradox.
jrgptrs.bsky.social
I occasionally read econometric instrumental variables (IV) literature, and I am always struck by the mismatch between the premise of these econometricians that IVs are used to generate knowledge and the truth that IVs are actually used to generate interesting results for highly ranked publications.
Reposted by Jörg Ankel-Peters
leecrawfurd.bsky.social
Disappointing follow-up results from a landmark RCT on gender norms in India. The curriculum changed norms in the short-term, but after six years had no impact on women's schooling, employment, or age of marriage

custom.cvent.com/4E741122FD8B...
Reposted by Jörg Ankel-Peters
jrgptrs.bsky.social
Coding errors in data processing are more likely to be ignored if the erroneous result is in line with what we want to see. The theoretical prediction made in this paper is very plausible - testing it empirically is perhaps a bit more challenging. But still, interesting. arxiv.org/pdf/2508.20069
Reposted by Jörg Ankel-Peters
mariannesaam.bsky.social
Come to the #VfS panel on #OpenScience with Severine Toussaert, @leventneyse.bsky.social @jrgptrs.bsky.social @larsvil.bsky.social . Looking forward to the discussion.
vfsecon.bsky.social
[2] 15/09 | 5:00 PM — Panel: Open Science – Increasing Research Transparency in Economics
Featuring ZBW, Jörg Ankel-Peters, Jan Marcus, Severine Toussaert, Lars Villhuber, Levent Neyse
#OpenScience #VfS_Conf2025
@wisocologne.bsky.social
Reposted by Jörg Ankel-Peters
ryancbriggs.net
The pretty draft is now online.

Link to paper (free): www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10....

Our replication package starts from the raw data and we put real work into making it readable & setting it up so people could poke at it, so please do explore it: dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtm...
The social sciences face a replicability crisis. A key determinant of replication success is statistical power. We assess the
power of political science research by collating over 16,000 hypothesis tests from about 2,000 articles in 46 areas of the
discipline. Under generous assumptions, we show that quantitative research in political science is greatly underpow-
ered: the median analysis has about 10% power, and only about 1 in 10 tests have at least 80% power to detect the
consensus effects reported in the literature. We also find substantial heterogeneity in tests across research areas, with
some being characterized by high power but most having very low power. To contextualize our findings, we survey
political methodologists to assess their expectations about power levels. Most methodologists greatly overestimate the
statistical power of political science research.