JStark lab
@jstarklab.bsky.social
700 followers 580 following 26 posts
Chasing DNA double strand break repair outcomes and clastogen response https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=JZpgwJwAAAAJ&hl=en
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
jstarklab.bsky.social
Exciting to have 3 days to focus on this pathway.
Reposted by JStark lab
filizkuybu.bsky.social
It’s been a long time coming! Grateful to all co-authors and colleagues who supported this study, especially @yilanfan.bsky.social 🙌 We have been working on this complex for nearly 3 years together and finally managed to tame it. MRN gave us Many Restless Nights, but we’re More Relaxed Now 😎
hopfnerlab.bsky.social
Thrilled that our work is now finally out in Nature Comms!
rdcu.be/eG3vP

We reveal cryo-EM structures of the MRN complex bound to DNA & TRF2 - showing how DNA breaks are sensed and regulated at telomeres.
Fantastic work by first authors @yilanfan.bsky.social @filizkuybu.bsky.social & Hengjun!
Reposted by JStark lab
biorxivpreprint.bsky.social
L1 insertion intermediates recombine with one another or with DNA breaks to form genome rearrangements https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.09.17.676864v1
jstarklab.bsky.social
I’m using this icon for my talk at nhej2025.sciencesconf.org
Guess the topic
jstarklab.bsky.social
Gearing up to head to Paris for nhej2025.sciencesconf.org but indulging in some LA delicacies before I go.
jstarklab.bsky.social
I’ve met many raw milk is healthy, we already have the cure for cancer, immunizations are dangerous, HIV isn’t the cause of AIDS people. As a scientist I thought it important to counter with respect and logic, and wonder how we are failing at public health. No more. New response - “that’s stupid!”
Reposted by JStark lab
merz.bsky.social
I am delighted to announce that the UW Department of Biochemistry has opened searches for TWO tenure-track positions.

Descriptions and links in the following two posts.
Reposted by JStark lab
durocher1.bsky.social
JOB ALERT 🚨 We are hiring TWO principal investigators in cell, molecular, systems, or chemical biology in Toronto, Canada at @sinaihealth.bsky.social. We provide a generous startup, fully funded salary and academic appointment at U of Toronto.

www.nature.com/naturecareer...

Please repost!
Image of Toronto
Reposted by JStark lab
prasad.bsky.social
this is so wonderful and so critical right now
ohsuknight.bsky.social
Phil and Penny Knight announced today a record-breaking $2 billion gift to the Oregon Health & Science University’s Knight Cancer Institute to transform the future of cancer care and set a new standard globally.

Thank you to Phil and Penny Knight for their incredible generosity.

#GiveCancerHell
White text over a black background; “Give Cancer Hell” An OHSU Knight Cancer Institute logo is placed below. The top text reads:

Cancer is the biggest fight in the history of the world. We will win.
It will be hard. We're built for it.
We care. Every breath. Of every second. Of every day.
Great things come from the most unexpected places.
Look around. We're surrounded by heroes.
This is not a job. This is our life.
Cancer does not discriminate. Neither will we.
Bold moves only.
Cancer doesn't see us coming. We will outlast, and we will outwit it.
This fight is and always will be personal.
"GIVE CANCER HELL." in bold at the bottom.
Reposted by JStark lab
nar-cancer-editor.bsky.social
Our sister journal, Nucleic Acids Research, has opened a search for an Executive Editor. Great opportunity for mid-career or senior investigator looking to be part of a great team, handle 100-150 papers per year, and attend the annual EE meeting. Details at: academic.oup.com/nar/pages/ex...
NAR seeks a new Executive Editor
Overview of the Journal Nucleic Acids Research (NAR) is a leading open access molecular biology journal published by Oxford University Press. It provides rapid
academic.oup.com
jstarklab.bsky.social
Fingers crossed 🤞
jstarklab.bsky.social
Yeah…10% was bad enough…
Reposted by JStark lab
svasti.bsky.social
I was thinking about this too as I'm a standing member at NIH and review did the DoD. The amount of time and effort for no monetary benefit that is expected of us is unreasonable even at a 10th percentile funding rate. But at 4%.... what are we even asking of scientists?
jstarklab.bsky.social
4% payline demoralizing for reviewers - review 9 grants each taking 3-4hrs (total reviewed by all is 90) flying to DC, a hotel conference room to discuss the top half of grants (45) 15 min each, 3x a year for 4 yrs. Paid $300. 4% = maybe 3/90, 0-1 that you reviewed funded. I couldn’t.
jstarklab.bsky.social
4% payline demoralizing for reviewers - review 9 grants each taking 3-4hrs (total reviewed by all is 90) flying to DC, a hotel conference room to discuss the top half of grants (45) 15 min each, 3x a year for 4 yrs. Paid $300. 4% = maybe 3/90, 0-1 that you reviewed funded. I couldn’t.
Reposted by JStark lab
carolynbertozzi.bskyverified.social
Seems a good time to invite Sen Britt to watch an NIH review panel (aka study section) analyze piles of grants over several days to identify the <10% that win funding. Applications that scientists spent months preparing, whose peers spent weeks poring through in advance of review mtg at NIH.
maxkozlov.bsky.social
Republican Senator Katie Britt: We need to create a system "where the beat idea wins... This is our opportunity to make a dollar go further and to make it have a greater impact."

(NIH already generates $2.56 for every $1 spent it spends on research.)