Kevin Anderson
banner
kevinclimate.bsky.social
Kevin Anderson
@kevinclimate.bsky.social
Professor of Energy & Climate Change at Universities of Manchester & Uppsala.

Translating climate science, through carbon budgets, into policy goals & mitigation options.
Co-founder https://climateuncensored.com
Thanks for the feedback - & certainly an insightful quote.
January 23, 2026 at 1:00 AM
Thanks for the kind comment.
January 23, 2026 at 12:58 AM
Thanks for the kind support.
January 22, 2026 at 1:51 PM
Reposted by Kevin Anderson
Ach ja. I tend to snort hopium, sorry. You're right of course.
And these 700Gt CO2 bound in rewilded areas currently in use for animal agri are also not safely stored in the new/old biomes. If climate keeps changing bc we keep emitting, they can go up in flames-eq too.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
The carbon opportunity cost of animal-sourced food production on land - Nature Sustainability
Shifting global food production to plant-based diets by 2050 can sequester 99–163% of the CO2 emissions budget towards limiting climate warming to 1.5 °C.
www.nature.com
January 21, 2026 at 6:11 PM
Hi Stephen. That’s certainly fine by me. I look forward to catching up.
January 21, 2026 at 11:55 PM
Reposted by Kevin Anderson
You already can look it here. And it's really worth it.
WATCH: National Emergency briefing on climate and nature by UK experts
YouTube video by GBNews
www.youtube.com
December 2, 2025 at 9:01 PM
Not sure - I'll enquire.
January 21, 2026 at 3:39 PM
Not even for peat. Local climate impacts are too unpredictable for any biogenic CDR to provide certainty comparable to the guaranteed emissions from burning lithospheric carbon (oil/gas/coal), from AMOC risks to other feedbacks, especially as we've yet to demonstrate any effective global mitigation.
January 21, 2026 at 3:22 PM
Reposted by Kevin Anderson
Agreed, but biogenic CDR is inherently temporary & uncertain, unlike the effectively permanent & guaranteed emissions from burning lithospheric carbon (oil, gas, coal). So use it to offset warming from unavoidable agricultural emissions, but it must not be used to compensate for fossil fuel CO₂.
January 21, 2026 at 12:07 PM
Agreed, but biogenic CDR is inherently temporary & uncertain, unlike the effectively permanent & guaranteed emissions from burning lithospheric carbon (oil, gas, coal). So use it to offset warming from unavoidable agricultural emissions, but it must not be used to compensate for fossil fuel CO₂.
January 21, 2026 at 12:07 PM
Reposted by Kevin Anderson
Absolutely; we’ve left it far too late to rely solely on technology. Yes tech is a prerequisite of delivering on Paris, but it is now far from sufficient. We also need urgent & profound changes to the social norms of us hi-emitters - & that means stringent & fair legislation to cut our energy use.
November 30, 2025 at 1:40 AM
Reposted by Kevin Anderson
1979: "Empathy and trust must be restored between politicians, administrators, businessmen[sic], and activist groups"
2025: "Instead of empathy and trust we've chosen delusion, misinformation, lies. Worse, this magical thinking has spread into expert communities notwithstanding the laws of physics"
January 20, 2026 at 8:04 AM
Reposted by Kevin Anderson
🎯"This is the defining contradiction of our age: a species capable of extraordinary insight, yet seemingly incapable of acting in its own long-term interest. Whether this failure is a temporary lapse or a terminal condition remains unresolved. History, and geology, will render the verdict".
January 20, 2026 at 8:05 AM
Reposted by Kevin Anderson
Well, the circumstance we are now in with the climate (that we all depend on to meet our needs) rapidly collapsing, means that those who are well off need to *accept* that many of our wants really aren't needs. That's necessary to "serve the poorest first," and for "the best for future generations."
January 14, 2026 at 10:49 AM
Reposted by Kevin Anderson
I’ve little time for the elitist gong system. With occasional exceptions, it rewards those already privileged & who reinforce the establishment rather than challenge it. A scattering of minor honours for the underpaid/volunteers is moral camouflage for rewarding compliance & for flattering power.
January 6, 2026 at 10:01 AM
I’ve little time for the elitist gong system. With occasional exceptions, it rewards those already privileged & who reinforce the establishment rather than challenge it. A scattering of minor honours for the underpaid/volunteers is moral camouflage for rewarding compliance & for flattering power.
January 6, 2026 at 10:01 AM