Kimmo Kannala
@kimmok.bsky.social
Engineer 24h/7 ?
Ok, I fail to be friendly 24h/7, sorry for that.
Ok, I fail to be friendly 24h/7, sorry for that.
Sure.
But at least e.g. the money paid for SpaceX has delivered at least $40B worth of services (some estimate $60B).
But at least e.g. the money paid for SpaceX has delivered at least $40B worth of services (some estimate $60B).
December 14, 2025 at 12:24 PM
Sure.
But at least e.g. the money paid for SpaceX has delivered at least $40B worth of services (some estimate $60B).
But at least e.g. the money paid for SpaceX has delivered at least $40B worth of services (some estimate $60B).
I love SpaceX because they are the only one who reuse and therefore pollute less than others per launch.
I imagine that reuse causes the sound you suffer from.
Americans should convince the government to work towards movin landing areas further away from the population.
I imagine that reuse causes the sound you suffer from.
Americans should convince the government to work towards movin landing areas further away from the population.
December 14, 2025 at 11:33 AM
I love SpaceX because they are the only one who reuse and therefore pollute less than others per launch.
I imagine that reuse causes the sound you suffer from.
Americans should convince the government to work towards movin landing areas further away from the population.
I imagine that reuse causes the sound you suffer from.
Americans should convince the government to work towards movin landing areas further away from the population.
Starlink @ Crimea was forbidden by international sanctions.
Also, Starlink terminals were donated only for civilian use.
(Elon is mostly an idiot, though.)
Also, Starlink terminals were donated only for civilian use.
(Elon is mostly an idiot, though.)
December 14, 2025 at 11:26 AM
Starlink @ Crimea was forbidden by international sanctions.
Also, Starlink terminals were donated only for civilian use.
(Elon is mostly an idiot, though.)
Also, Starlink terminals were donated only for civilian use.
(Elon is mostly an idiot, though.)
So, dems will end human spaceflight for USA?
I doubt. Obama was smart when he enabled competition for launch services.
NASA&tax payers have saved tens of billions.
I doubt. Obama was smart when he enabled competition for launch services.
NASA&tax payers have saved tens of billions.
December 8, 2025 at 12:33 AM
So, dems will end human spaceflight for USA?
I doubt. Obama was smart when he enabled competition for launch services.
NASA&tax payers have saved tens of billions.
I doubt. Obama was smart when he enabled competition for launch services.
NASA&tax payers have saved tens of billions.
Nonsense.
It is new tech. The lowest latency satellite network so far.
And the most responsible handling of launch debris and satellite lifetime.
etc.
It is new tech. The lowest latency satellite network so far.
And the most responsible handling of launch debris and satellite lifetime.
etc.
December 8, 2025 at 12:20 AM
Nonsense.
It is new tech. The lowest latency satellite network so far.
And the most responsible handling of launch debris and satellite lifetime.
etc.
It is new tech. The lowest latency satellite network so far.
And the most responsible handling of launch debris and satellite lifetime.
etc.
Facts remain.
The pricing and other facts (like their current superiority in rocketry) are openly available.
But as most of you guys BELIEVE also in flat earth etc, you can not be educated.
bye
The pricing and other facts (like their current superiority in rocketry) are openly available.
But as most of you guys BELIEVE also in flat earth etc, you can not be educated.
bye
December 5, 2025 at 9:15 PM
Facts remain.
The pricing and other facts (like their current superiority in rocketry) are openly available.
But as most of you guys BELIEVE also in flat earth etc, you can not be educated.
bye
The pricing and other facts (like their current superiority in rocketry) are openly available.
But as most of you guys BELIEVE also in flat earth etc, you can not be educated.
bye
Not yet.
Not in capability and not in price.
But perhaps one day.
In a perfect world RocketLab conquers/beats both billionaires.
Not in capability and not in price.
But perhaps one day.
In a perfect world RocketLab conquers/beats both billionaires.
December 5, 2025 at 9:08 PM
Not yet.
Not in capability and not in price.
But perhaps one day.
In a perfect world RocketLab conquers/beats both billionaires.
Not in capability and not in price.
But perhaps one day.
In a perfect world RocketLab conquers/beats both billionaires.
Yet they dominate in space cargo and in human spaceflight.
December 5, 2025 at 9:03 PM
Yet they dominate in space cargo and in human spaceflight.
Reposted by Kimmo Kannala
...and the video you all are waiting for: birds-eye view of the ZQ-3 first stage's botched landing burn. It was *that* close you know, getting further than the first New Glenn booster did and around where SpaceX were for Falcon 9 in late 2014-early 2015!
m.weibo.cn/detail/52397...
m.weibo.cn/detail/52397...
December 3, 2025 at 5:27 AM
...and the video you all are waiting for: birds-eye view of the ZQ-3 first stage's botched landing burn. It was *that* close you know, getting further than the first New Glenn booster did and around where SpaceX were for Falcon 9 in late 2014-early 2015!
m.weibo.cn/detail/52397...
m.weibo.cn/detail/52397...
So ... Trump does the same thing that Putin does in eastern european countries, mess up the airspace with GPS interference.
It's terrorism.
It's terrorism.
December 3, 2025 at 4:21 PM
So ... Trump does the same thing that Putin does in eastern european countries, mess up the airspace with GPS interference.
It's terrorism.
It's terrorism.
Starlink should not work in russia controlled areas, but I'm not sure why the coverage is not shrunk more since 2022.
Almost as if the block/allow accuracy is hundreds of kilometers?
Almost as if the block/allow accuracy is hundreds of kilometers?
December 1, 2025 at 9:39 PM
Starlink should not work in russia controlled areas, but I'm not sure why the coverage is not shrunk more since 2022.
Almost as if the block/allow accuracy is hundreds of kilometers?
Almost as if the block/allow accuracy is hundreds of kilometers?
Apparently you have no clue about the matter.
Starship could have stayed in orbit already many times.
But they are trying to accomplish something much more difficult.
HLS is not ever going to try to be "human rated" in normal sence. Just like any other lander, it is going to be manned in space.
Starship could have stayed in orbit already many times.
But they are trying to accomplish something much more difficult.
HLS is not ever going to try to be "human rated" in normal sence. Just like any other lander, it is going to be manned in space.
December 1, 2025 at 5:08 PM
Apparently you have no clue about the matter.
Starship could have stayed in orbit already many times.
But they are trying to accomplish something much more difficult.
HLS is not ever going to try to be "human rated" in normal sence. Just like any other lander, it is going to be manned in space.
Starship could have stayed in orbit already many times.
But they are trying to accomplish something much more difficult.
HLS is not ever going to try to be "human rated" in normal sence. Just like any other lander, it is going to be manned in space.
LOL!
SpaceX HLS is a fixed price contract!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kl_x...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7bE...
SpaceX HLS is a fixed price contract!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kl_x...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7bE...
The Mental Decay of Thunderf00t
YouTube video by Molotoff
www.youtube.com
December 1, 2025 at 5:04 PM
LOL!
SpaceX HLS is a fixed price contract!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kl_x...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7bE...
SpaceX HLS is a fixed price contract!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kl_x...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7bE...
And I'm saddened to see that NASA has continued to use terroRuzzia's rocket services.
November 30, 2025 at 7:22 PM
And I'm saddened to see that NASA has continued to use terroRuzzia's rocket services.
A 3-tonne Chinese rocket stage (CZ-3B Y67 stage 3, object 44867) launched in Dec 2019 and abandoned in orbit, made an uncontrolled reentry over eastern Florida at about 1120 UTC Nov 8 and was widely observed.
November 30, 2025 at 7:18 PM
SpaceX is ~50% cheaper than the next guy and 90% cheaper than the old guy.
It is difficult to change. Billionaire can build a rocket company, normal people cannot. Government run operators cost 10x.
It is difficult to change. Billionaire can build a rocket company, normal people cannot. Government run operators cost 10x.
November 29, 2025 at 9:35 PM
SpaceX is ~50% cheaper than the next guy and 90% cheaper than the old guy.
It is difficult to change. Billionaire can build a rocket company, normal people cannot. Government run operators cost 10x.
It is difficult to change. Billionaire can build a rocket company, normal people cannot. Government run operators cost 10x.
No-ones food money is used for "going to Mars".
After a quick calculation, less than 0,1% of the USA budget is used in Mars related activities.
www.nasa.gov/fy-2025-budg...
After a quick calculation, less than 0,1% of the USA budget is used in Mars related activities.
www.nasa.gov/fy-2025-budg...
November 29, 2025 at 9:32 PM
No-ones food money is used for "going to Mars".
After a quick calculation, less than 0,1% of the USA budget is used in Mars related activities.
www.nasa.gov/fy-2025-budg...
After a quick calculation, less than 0,1% of the USA budget is used in Mars related activities.
www.nasa.gov/fy-2025-budg...
Year ahead?
10 years ago SpaceX started to land their rocket boosters successfully.
They are 10+ years ahead of China.
10 years ago SpaceX started to land their rocket boosters successfully.
They are 10+ years ahead of China.
November 29, 2025 at 9:20 PM
Year ahead?
10 years ago SpaceX started to land their rocket boosters successfully.
They are 10+ years ahead of China.
10 years ago SpaceX started to land their rocket boosters successfully.
They are 10+ years ahead of China.