Erin Campos
kind-erin.bsky.social
Erin Campos
@kind-erin.bsky.social
Unfortunately, the only way to have the protections afforded to us in the constitution is to pay for them. Obviously that leaves only the wealthy and powerful criminals reaping the benefits.
All of the money that changed hands in the Teapot Dome scandal totaled less than $10 million after adjusting for inflation, and it was considered so corrupt we still teach it in high school government classes a century later.
Corruption so pungent, it wafts right off the page:

Lobbyists who do pardon deals “say their going rate is $1 million. Pardon-seekers have offered some lobbyists close to the president success fees of as much as $6 million if they can close the deal.”

Gift link www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
December 28, 2025 at 12:48 PM
Reposted by Erin Campos
The 5 sanctioned individuals by the US government are leaders of:

Centre for Countering Digital Hate

HateAid (who got recently the German Federal Cross of Merit)

Global Disinformation Index

(former) EU Commissioner for digital affairs

Any further questions?
December 27, 2025 at 8:44 PM
Reposted by Erin Campos
Kalen Dion is not wrong. 😳👇
December 27, 2025 at 10:44 PM
Reposted by Erin Campos
It's almost as if the Enlightenment figures who founded the US had learned the lessons of Europe's wars of religion and created a secular state that would both protect worshippers from political interference, AND protect the polity from becoming dominated by religious sectarians.
December 27, 2025 at 12:46 AM
The blatant corruption is horrifying. I don’t know what else to say about that.
Everyone should read this week’s WSJ story on Trump selling pardons. It’s some of the most corrupt shit I’ve ever seen—you can literally corner him at one of his lame parties and walk away with a pardon. How is this not the biggest story in the country?
December 26, 2025 at 2:28 PM
Reposted by Erin Campos
I worked for DOJ. I don't think people realize how dangerous it is for the White House to takeover the daily operations of the Justice Department.
December 25, 2025 at 5:05 AM
Reposted by Erin Campos
1 - the exec branch can't decline to spend $ Congress appropriated

2- the fed govt can't use federal $ to extort states over policy/political disagreements

3-the fed govt can't use federal $ to impose conditions unrelated to the funding program

4-the fed govt can't use federal $ to coerce states
Sean Duffy on blue states: "What I can do is I can pull their money. That's the leverage I do have ... I guarantee you that the federal taxpayer is not going to fund their roads and bridges and their systems when they are putting illegals on the roads."
December 23, 2025 at 2:32 PM
“National” security means trump security. Make no mistake about it, this administration is creating reasons to cause conflict throughout the world. And we, the American people, are paying for it.
December 23, 2025 at 1:52 PM
Yes, the DOJ is no longer justice for the people and institutions of this country. They only answer to and protect Trump.
December 23, 2025 at 1:51 PM
I deleted my X account about a year ago. I don’t miss it and all you’re doing is supporting musk and the rest of the vile monsters running the world.
There are plenty of obvious reasons to do this: Nobody under the age of 30 actually uses the site! You're rewarding Elon Musk!

But the most important thing is that some politicians and consultants are stewing in bot-driven, expensive Nazi propaganda, and it's giving them really bad, cruel ideas.
This has always been a Bluesky-first campaign. But as of today, we will no longer be using Twitter. At all.

And I'm calling on other candidates to follow suit.
December 22, 2025 at 7:28 PM
Reposted by Erin Campos
December 21, 2025 at 2:01 AM
Reposted by Erin Campos
🚨 The DOJ appears to have redacted Donald Trump’s name from the allegations made in this exhibit in the Epstein files.

Trump’s name was in the original release. Now, it’s blacked out.

See for yourself.
December 21, 2025 at 4:56 AM
Reposted by Erin Campos
The person charged with enforcing the laws is an open lawbreaker, assisted by a team of open lawbreakers, backed by a Congressional majority indifferent to lawbreaking, supported by a Supreme Court that privileges them to break the law.

It has no legitimacy whatsoever.
The person charged with enforcing the laws is himself a law breaker. In such a state, do laws even have any legitimacy?
December 21, 2025 at 12:46 AM
Reposted by Erin Campos
Goldman: This guy is so clearly trying to follow the Putin model—using the government to make money, making sure his allies control the most important companies in the country, including our media companies, doling out money by deregulating their industries, and taking money from them in return…
December 21, 2025 at 12:36 AM
And what they will do is focus on whatever files include Democrats. They will brush over all of the Trump stuff and any other high-powered ass kissers. Did anybody expect anything different?
I don’t think the law passed by Congress said that DOJ has to release less than 1% of the materials by Dec 19.
December 20, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Reposted by Erin Campos
This is what's so aggravating to me.
December 19, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Reposted by Erin Campos
“that is something that’s more akin to places like China, frankly.”
Sorkin: This is now state-sponsored capitalism. This is not really capitalism. Everything runs through 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue now. That is a fundamental reshift, and that is something that’s more akin to places like China, frankly.
December 18, 2025 at 8:36 PM
Reposted by Erin Campos
Ladies and gentleman: The President of the United States
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/18/u...
December 18, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Reposted by Erin Campos
First it was "we have to blow up dozens of people on boats because of fetnanyl." But obviously it wasn't fentanyl being trafficked so then: narco terrorists are shipping cocaine! But then Wiles tells a reporter it's all about regime change and today it's bc US oil companies got kicked out in 2007?
December 18, 2025 at 1:42 AM
Reposted by Erin Campos
It wasn't long ago that women were forced to have a male co-signer to get a credit card or a home loan.

Now, the Trump administration wants to end protections against such discrimination.

Take 45 seconds today to say "No way." nationalfairhousingalliance.salsalabs.org/ecoaregb/ind...
The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released by the CFPB would eviscerate longstanding fair lending and consumer protections in three dangerous ways:
nationalfairhousingalliance.salsalabs.org
December 15, 2025 at 5:01 PM
There is no longer freedom in this country. I don’t know if we ever had it, but we thought we did. 😔
One citizen said that federal agents in Idaho pointed guns at her children, ages 6 and 8, and dragged her 14-year-old daughter out of a truck and zip-tied her.

The mother told investigators that an agent threatened to “fucking blow your head off.”

By @nicolefoy.bsky.social
Immigration Agents Have Often Grabbed and Mistreated Citizens, Congressional Investigators Find
Prompted by ProPublica’s reporting, an investigation by Senate Democrats documented the experiences of nearly two dozen citizens wrongly detained by immigration agents, contradicting the Trump adminis...
www.propublica.org
December 15, 2025 at 2:58 PM
😡
Unqualified people running the most important departments in the government will be the death of us all.
The RFK, jr effect.
December 14, 2025 at 2:59 PM
Reposted by Erin Campos
December 12, 2025 at 10:41 PM
Reposted by Erin Campos
December 13, 2025 at 1:45 PM
Reposted by Erin Campos
December 13, 2025 at 3:58 PM