Experimental participants to us

🤬 “Among articles stating that data was available upon request, only 17% shared data upon request. … Results replicate those found elsewhere: data is generally not available upon request, and promissory Data Availability Statements are typically not adhered to.”

#openScience #philSci #ethics #psych

🐳 Excited to announce that this preprint has now morphed into a paper published in Memory & Cognition 🐳

rdcu.be/eiedk

🎄 Ho-ho-ho, final pre-print of the year 🎄

People don't change their mind much, but when they do, it's when cues to confidence are all over the place. Belief-logic conflict in itself not a cue to confidence in syllogisms, again (w and w/o time pressure).

osf.io/preprints/ps...

🧠 Cogitum: Train your logical reasoning!

As part of our research, @wimdeneys.bsky.social and I developed video-based training to boost sound reasoning 🎥 And we need your help to test it!

Try it anonymously (& share it!) in French or English here: cogitum-site.powerappsportals.com/homePage

💡New preprint

People doubt their answers on reasoning tasks based on many cues, not just the conflict between beliefs and logic. Overall consistency of the cues is more important. Also conflict detection is maybe just metacognition in a trench coat.
osf.io/preprints/ps...

perfect

This is pure beauty.

🐳 New preprint:

Some invalid inferences are intuitively valid to participants, which messes up measurements of conflict detection. People still notice their faulty reasoning, just not where we are looking for it.

osf.io/preprints/ps...

*Less than half* of misinformation studies expose people to both false and true info, and ONLY 7% measure discernment (the difference between believing/sharing true and false info)!!

misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/what...

Short 🧵 on why you should be measuring discernment👇