John Wiseman
banner
lemonodor.bsky.social
John Wiseman
@lemonodor.bsky.social
Persistent sousveiller. Walt Disney R&D Imagineer. DM for Signal. https://heavymeta.org
More details on the analysis here: bsky.app/profile/lemo...
1/ This Embry-Riddle aircraft reported GPS problems at Daytona Intl during the recent solar storm: They lost WAAS and couldn't do the RNAV GPS approach. It made me curious what the overall effect was on aviation, so I looked at aircraft GPS data worldwide. (Video from the ATC app: atc.com)
January 23, 2026 at 7:36 PM
Yes, I know NACp is a categorical value. I said I was speaking very roughly!
January 22, 2026 at 11:27 PM
January 22, 2026 at 9:12 PM
13/ This is a nice one too. (Thanks, @russ.garrett.co.uk)
January 22, 2026 at 6:17 PM
12/ Then for the data, compute mean NACp and subtract the baseline NACp for that minute of the day and 10° latitude band. Chart that difference.
January 22, 2026 at 6:13 PM
11/ Analysis details: For each 60 second period, take the median NACp reported by an aircraft. Use the mean latitude it reported, and assign the NACp to a 10° band of latitude. Use the data from before the storm to compute a baseline: Each minute of a day and latitude band has an avg NACp.
January 22, 2026 at 6:10 PM
10/ But also look at this crazy animated map of the last 6 hours of the ionosphere from www.sws.bom.gov.au/HF_Systems/6/5 (thanks, @grajohnt.bsky.social).
January 22, 2026 at 6:03 PM
9/ My guess is a lot of this repeated diurnal structure has to do with reliable daily changes in aircraft distribution. Waves of aircraft crossing the Atlantic & Pacific, etc. bsky.app/profile/lemo...
January 22, 2026 at 6:02 PM
8/ There seems to be a delay between solar storm onset and anomalous decrease in NACp (the temporal resolution of the time axis is 60 seconds). Does it take time for the ionosphere to "heat up"?
January 22, 2026 at 5:57 PM
7/ You might also wonder if my analysis is correct. Well, I can pretty much guarantee there are mistakes somewhere, but I think this result is pretty plausible. "Solar storm caused GPS issues" isn't a surprise.
January 22, 2026 at 5:54 PM
Right! I wonder if the big east west waves might explain some of the finer structure of the daily signal–e.g., see how there's a pretty strong double-peak (maybe even triple-) at the leading edge of the larger daily peak?
January 22, 2026 at 5:51 PM
6/ Yes, but aircraft and ADS-B receivers aren't equally distributed around the world. They're mostly in the Western hemisphere, and also in some specific latitude and longitude ranges. So I'm not surprised you can see daily variation.
January 22, 2026 at 5:45 PM
5/ You may be wondering: “If the daily variation in NACp reflects ionospheric changes driven by sunlight, why would you see a clear 24-hour cycle in global NACp? Aircraft are distributed around the world at all times, so daylight effects should average out—shouldn’t they?”
January 22, 2026 at 5:42 PM
4/ This chart subtracts the daily periodic baseline from NACp measurements so anomalies caused by the solar storm are more obvious. NACp ranges from 0 (lowest GPS accuracy) to 10 (highest), and the storm seems to have caused an average drop of less than 0.8.
January 22, 2026 at 5:37 PM
3/ This chart shows avg NACp (a GPS-accuracy indicator) for all aircraft worldwide starting Jan 16. You can see the ionosphere’s daily rhythm, which affects GPS signals. Kp: geomagnetic activity. The dashed line marks the solar storm peak; shortly after, there appear to be anomalous effects in NACp.
January 22, 2026 at 5:28 PM
2/ There's no obvious effect from the solar flare shown on GPSJAM. The places that are usually green are still green. But the default GPSJAM map is tuned to show interference that makes GPS unusable, so maybe it's not sensitive enough. gpsjam.org?lat=37.44890...
GPSJAM GPS/GNSS Interference Map
Map showing possible GPS interference around 37.449, -12.554 on 2026-01-20.
gpsjam.org
January 22, 2026 at 5:19 PM