Liam U. Taylor
@liamtaylor.bsky.social
1.3K followers 720 following 770 posts
Doherty Postdoc in Biology - Bowdoin College - BSS Kent Island
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
liamtaylor.bsky.social
I've drawn us a helpful diagram
liamtaylor.bsky.social
meanwhile all my friends have started looking like Buck Meek in the KEXP live version of Not by Big Thief
liamtaylor.bsky.social
Born to look like Adrienne Lenker in the KEXP live version of Not by Big Thief, forced to look like James Krivchenia in the KEXP live version of Not by Big Thief
liamtaylor.bsky.social
just let me hyperlink to truth tables in all my sentences
liamtaylor.bsky.social
styles don't allow "and/or" because it's vague, but there's even more trouble when I try to add "XOR" to my manuscripts? get a grip
Reposted by Liam U. Taylor
liamtaylor.bsky.social
(fair enough if authors themselves think it's rad, though)
liamtaylor.bsky.social
I genuinely do not mean to be controversial but please we don't need taxonomic authorities in the TITLES of papers that aren't about systematics
Reposted by Liam U. Taylor
isabel.kim
ive been on-and-off trying to write a story about AI for a couple of years, and I think i finally cracked it with WIRE MOTHER, which is out in @clarkesworldmagazine.com (tw in the post below).

also hey, this issue is stacked??

clarkesworldmagazine.com/kim_10_25/
Wire Mother by Isabel J. Kim
Clarkesworld Science Fiction and Fantasy Magazine and Podcast.
clarkesworldmagazine.com
liamtaylor.bsky.social
There are horrors beyond life's edge that we do not suspect,
randvegan.bsky.social
I use leading commas for all my functions.

mtcars |>
filter(
TRUE
,vs==1
, mpg > 20
, am!=0
)
libbyheeren.bsky.social
Tell me something you do when you code that other people would tell you that you shouldn't do.

Tell me the rules you break!

I'll go first: I work in untitled files in the wrong project directories all the time. Like, all the time. Yes, I do tend to lose things 😂 #databs #rstats #python
liamtaylor.bsky.social
an important part of modern biology is picking appropriate proxies for fitness, which are carefully confirmed by anonymous peer reviewers by checking whether there is a tradeoff in those proxies
liamtaylor.bsky.social
so it's true I'm optimized, as I always suspected
liamtaylor.bsky.social
In the 1980s biologists discovered the idea that an organism cannot be in two places at once, which was hailed as a major innovation at the time
liamtaylor.bsky.social
my face when I read this sentence in 1000 papers 100000 times per day
liamtaylor.bsky.social
Understanding the tradeoff between the tradeoff between the tradeoffs between current and future tradeoffs between future and current reproductive success is critical for evaluating long term trends in tradeoffs between current and future reproductive success.
liamtaylor.bsky.social
Now with pages in Conservation Biology

Clarifying the so-called gull problem in the Gulf of Maine: Response to Taylor et al. (2024)
doi.org/10.1111/cobi...

Incomplete progress toward reasoning about the gull problem: Reply to Diamond et al. (2025)
doi.org/10.1111/cobi...

#gulls
Clarifying the so‐called gull problem in the Gulf of Maine: Response to Taylor et al. (2024)
Click on the article title to read more.
doi.org
liamtaylor.bsky.social
I've drawn us a helpful diagram
liamtaylor.bsky.social
In general, though, I find my colleagues and I profoundly disrespectful of centuries of progress made in other disciplines (especially the humanities)
liamtaylor.bsky.social
like, Nancy Cartwright is the one to tell me whether I've found a *law* of evolution. I should shut up and measure birds. Not because I'm weak or dumb, just because I've thought a lot about birds, and she's thought a lot about laws
liamtaylor.bsky.social
I don't care that practicing scientists flounder foundational terms (say 'meaning' in signaling, 'law' in evolution, 'nature' in conservation) - that's too much to ask for their (our) skills/interests.

I do find it frustrating and unnecessary that they (we) constantly build *from* those terms
Reposted by Liam U. Taylor
Reposted by Liam U. Taylor
esqueer.net
The Heritage Foundation is going after me this morning calling me a terrorist because I am accurately stating what they are intending to do. Michael Knowles at CPAC explicitly called for the "eradication of transgenderism."

I'll continue to speak the truth of what is being done to my community.
A tweet from Oversight Project (@ItsYourGov) shows a screenshot of an Advocate article. The tweet text says: “This is an example of an element of TIVE rhetoric coming from @Harvard Professor Alejandra Caraballo @Esqueer_in the @TheAdvocateMag. The notion that opposing Transgender Ideology is a form of violence (‘eradication’ here) leads people to justify violence.” The screenshot highlights a quote from Alejandra Caraballo criticizing a Heritage Foundation policy proposal: “They want us all eradicated.”