Bier Bua
@litigator53.bsky.social
Lawyer, reader, connoisseur of invective
Soon to transition from the NYT op ed page to CBS News, no doubt
November 13, 2025 at 3:21 AM
Soon to transition from the NYT op ed page to CBS News, no doubt
Umm, people still don’t have SNAP…
November 13, 2025 at 1:10 AM
Umm, people still don’t have SNAP…
I think that is beyond his abilities
November 13, 2025 at 1:07 AM
I think that is beyond his abilities
Cult is right! And just whom are they “bombing”?
November 12, 2025 at 8:16 PM
Cult is right! And just whom are they “bombing”?
What he meant was his OWN health care. Every other sucker is on their own.
November 12, 2025 at 3:06 AM
What he meant was his OWN health care. Every other sucker is on their own.
And never has been this awful.
November 12, 2025 at 3:01 AM
And never has been this awful.
How else was the cash to be exchanged?
November 12, 2025 at 2:58 AM
How else was the cash to be exchanged?
Reposted by Bier Bua
(7/X) The racial angle in Cedric's joke makes no sense. No one WAMFW more than Irish-Americans. They wrote a whole song about wishing someone would put up an Irish need not apply sign so they could beat the shit out of him for it.
But...it's still a great video.
But...it's still a great video.
November 11, 2025 at 5:13 PM
(7/X) The racial angle in Cedric's joke makes no sense. No one WAMFW more than Irish-Americans. They wrote a whole song about wishing someone would put up an Irish need not apply sign so they could beat the shit out of him for it.
But...it's still a great video.
But...it's still a great video.
Can anyone name one thing Trump has done which was aimed at alleviating homelessness for veterans or anyone else?
November 11, 2025 at 5:23 PM
Can anyone name one thing Trump has done which was aimed at alleviating homelessness for veterans or anyone else?
No way is this true. Access journalism at its finest.
November 10, 2025 at 11:01 PM
No way is this true. Access journalism at its finest.
Reposted by Bier Bua
More on a shiv that Abbe Lowell will deploy that Pat Fitz will not, in my experience: You cowards refuse to disavow Trump.
![In faulting Attorney General James for “try[ing] to bootstrap” a Section 546 violation into
a violation of the Appointments Clause, the government betrays a fundamental misunderstanding
of how the two provisions relate. The government again attempts to slay a strawman in
emphasizing that “not every action in excess of statutory authority is ipso facto in violation of the
Constitution.” Br. 23 (citation omitted). That is not what Attorney General James argues.
Attorney General James’s theory of a constitutional violation is grounded in the plain text of the
Appointments Clause and does not, as the government mistakenly claims, provide that “every
statutory violation would become a constitutional violation.” Br. 23 (emphasis omitted). The
Appointments Clause dictates that inferior officers like U.S. Attorneys can be appointed only 1)
by the President “with the Advice and Consent of the Senate,” or 2) through a process that
Congress has properly authorized “by Law.” An appointment that comports with neither of these
pathways violates the Appointments Clause. In United States v. Trump, 740 F. Supp. 3d 1245,
1304 (S.D. Fla. 2024), the district court recognized that if an inferior office is appointed in a
manner that does not comply with any statute, her appointment violates the Appointments Clause. The government contends that Attorney General James’s theory of Appointments Clause
violations is too broad, but tellingly, it does not argue that Trump was incorrectly decided.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:bbp2b224lro3bfnzcqwwnkfo/bafkreida3uqnncjcuhs6frzefj7s2ktupte4iaoqi7x2z5n56vjtfqlysy@jpeg)
November 10, 2025 at 10:49 PM
More on a shiv that Abbe Lowell will deploy that Pat Fitz will not, in my experience: You cowards refuse to disavow Trump.