Emma Radcliffe
@lottielulu.bsky.social
Lefty dog lover. Portrait & Landscape artist.
Love nature. Hate war.
Never Vote Tory
Love nature. Hate war.
Never Vote Tory
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
Did anybody really expect anything different? The fact that this isn't shocking shows how far standards have fallen; all adided by the compliant right wing media.
April 9, 2025 at 1:02 PM
Did anybody really expect anything different? The fact that this isn't shocking shows how far standards have fallen; all adided by the compliant right wing media.
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
So now that the EU is on the same 10% tariff as the UK, could we please hear from all those who tried to portray the previous scenario as a 'Brexit benefit'...
April 9, 2025 at 5:52 PM
So now that the EU is on the same 10% tariff as the UK, could we please hear from all those who tried to portray the previous scenario as a 'Brexit benefit'...
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
Boycotting the grocery store until they start buying an equivalent volume of groceries from me
April 7, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Boycotting the grocery store until they start buying an equivalent volume of groceries from me
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
We warned you of their plan
April 3, 2025 at 2:00 PM
We warned you of their plan
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
A $2,300 Apple iPhone? Trump tariffs could make that happen.
Tariffs could increase iPhone prices by up to 43%. Samsung may gain advantage due to lower tariffs on South Korea.
What happened to America first?!!!
#MomSky
www.reuters.com/technology/w...
Tariffs could increase iPhone prices by up to 43%. Samsung may gain advantage due to lower tariffs on South Korea.
What happened to America first?!!!
#MomSky
www.reuters.com/technology/w...
A $2,300 Apple iPhone? Trump tariffs could make that happen.
Your favorite iPhone could soon become much pricier, thanks to tariffs.
www.reuters.com
April 3, 2025 at 5:32 PM
A $2,300 Apple iPhone? Trump tariffs could make that happen.
Tariffs could increase iPhone prices by up to 43%. Samsung may gain advantage due to lower tariffs on South Korea.
What happened to America first?!!!
#MomSky
www.reuters.com/technology/w...
Tariffs could increase iPhone prices by up to 43%. Samsung may gain advantage due to lower tariffs on South Korea.
What happened to America first?!!!
#MomSky
www.reuters.com/technology/w...
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
What if you’re so outrageously incompetent you get it done in a matter of minutes?
April 3, 2025 at 2:06 PM
What if you’re so outrageously incompetent you get it done in a matter of minutes?
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
ECONOMY IN SHAMBLES
U.S. job cuts hit 275,240 in March 2025, the highest since the pandemic peak in 2020, surpassing 2001 & 2008 recessions. Layoffs surge as federal cuts, led by DOGE, echo Covid-era losses.
It's the third highest monthly total on record.
U.S. job cuts hit 275,240 in March 2025, the highest since the pandemic peak in 2020, surpassing 2001 & 2008 recessions. Layoffs surge as federal cuts, led by DOGE, echo Covid-era losses.
It's the third highest monthly total on record.
April 3, 2025 at 3:40 PM
ECONOMY IN SHAMBLES
U.S. job cuts hit 275,240 in March 2025, the highest since the pandemic peak in 2020, surpassing 2001 & 2008 recessions. Layoffs surge as federal cuts, led by DOGE, echo Covid-era losses.
It's the third highest monthly total on record.
U.S. job cuts hit 275,240 in March 2025, the highest since the pandemic peak in 2020, surpassing 2001 & 2008 recessions. Layoffs surge as federal cuts, led by DOGE, echo Covid-era losses.
It's the third highest monthly total on record.
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
Cheetos or Doritos? 🧐 #orangefoolius 🤡
March 30, 2025 at 11:24 PM
Cheetos or Doritos? 🧐 #orangefoolius 🤡
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
If we lost the billionaires what would we lose?
Absolutely nothing.
What would we gain?
$20tn, all our Public Services back, most of our Private ones, and 60% of our housing.
Easy choice, isn't it?
Absolutely nothing.
What would we gain?
$20tn, all our Public Services back, most of our Private ones, and 60% of our housing.
Easy choice, isn't it?
March 30, 2025 at 11:06 PM
If we lost the billionaires what would we lose?
Absolutely nothing.
What would we gain?
$20tn, all our Public Services back, most of our Private ones, and 60% of our housing.
Easy choice, isn't it?
Absolutely nothing.
What would we gain?
$20tn, all our Public Services back, most of our Private ones, and 60% of our housing.
Easy choice, isn't it?
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
American Public Schools Didn’t Cause This.
The Religious Right did!
You Could See It Coming In The 1980s.
The Religious Right did!
You Could See It Coming In The 1980s.
March 28, 2025 at 2:20 PM
American Public Schools Didn’t Cause This.
The Religious Right did!
You Could See It Coming In The 1980s.
The Religious Right did!
You Could See It Coming In The 1980s.
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
This is a real tweet posted by the official White House government account. Yes, really.
March 28, 2025 at 4:41 PM
This is a real tweet posted by the official White House government account. Yes, really.
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
"Yes yes, the cuts will push you into poverty, and that is heartbreaking, but YOUR sacrifice will help us achieve an average growth rate of 1.8% for the next 5 years"
March 26, 2025 at 2:33 PM
"Yes yes, the cuts will push you into poverty, and that is heartbreaking, but YOUR sacrifice will help us achieve an average growth rate of 1.8% for the next 5 years"
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
Once again - this is not what millions of us voted for.
We wanted better and those most in need NEEDED better and if labour don't understand how bad all of this looks then they're in deep and dire straits
We wanted better and those most in need NEEDED better and if labour don't understand how bad all of this looks then they're in deep and dire straits
The OBR has not yet been able to forecast any employment gain from the cuts/changes to incapacity & disability benefits
MPs are being asked to support around £6.5bn of cuts & increased conditionality for ill & disabled people without any clear assessment of what it will achieve
MPs are being asked to support around £6.5bn of cuts & increased conditionality for ill & disabled people without any clear assessment of what it will achieve
March 26, 2025 at 2:39 PM
Once again - this is not what millions of us voted for.
We wanted better and those most in need NEEDED better and if labour don't understand how bad all of this looks then they're in deep and dire straits
We wanted better and those most in need NEEDED better and if labour don't understand how bad all of this looks then they're in deep and dire straits
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
Save the Children says this could be the first Labour government to “oversee a rise” in child poverty rather than a decline. Still, I’m sure disabled mums can comfort their hungry children with the news Rachel Reeves has managed to stick to her fiscal rules.
March 26, 2025 at 5:36 PM
Save the Children says this could be the first Labour government to “oversee a rise” in child poverty rather than a decline. Still, I’m sure disabled mums can comfort their hungry children with the news Rachel Reeves has managed to stick to her fiscal rules.
Reposted by Emma Radcliffe
I think everyone has known this for about 8 years now.
But many Americans don't seem to care.
But many Americans don't seem to care.
March 26, 2025 at 5:36 PM
I think everyone has known this for about 8 years now.
But many Americans don't seem to care.
But many Americans don't seem to care.