Mahtin
@mahtininthesky.bsky.social
37 followers 68 following 630 posts
Californian in NYC. Not good at writing my thoughts succinctly.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
If the 2024 election definitively proved one thing, it is that the Dem strategy for addressing GOP dominance of federal courts - win every presidential election until enough reactionary judges die to retake the majority - is not remotely viable.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
LMAO, what a moron.

I have no doubt that Posobiec and his white supremacist ilk think the anti-fascists were the main villains in Weimar Germany, rather than the Nazis. It boggles my mind though that he's too much of an idiot to know he should keep that thought to himself in a public setting.
paleofuture.bsky.social
"Antifa has been around in various iterations for almost 100 years in some instances, going back to the Weimar Republic in Germany."

- Jack Posobiec at Trump's roundtable on antifa
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
Rubenstein later accused the NYTimes of having two tracks for op-eds. His own recounting, however, makes it really clear that the paper was doing this as a way of *prioritizing* conservative op-eds that might not withstand the rigorous factchecking required of pieces form other perspectives.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
He ended up getting pushed out after doing some really shoddy work in connection with the infamous Tom Cotton op-ed advocating for violence against racial justice protestors.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
From the moment he arrived, he operated as a right-wing troll. Invoking a right-wing culture war symbol like Chick-fil-A and and then pretending to be offended when people pushed back is a classic conservative troll move. So too falsely conflating voter suppression (real!) with voter fraud (nope).
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
All of this is pretty much there if you read between the lines of Rubenstein's own account of his time at the NYTimes.

archive.is/7Yt7g
archive.is
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
Been saying this for a while, but one of the ways Dems could make other powerful actors and institutions reconsider capitulating to / collaborating with the regime and its lawbreaking is by promising accountability.

The attitude of "look forwards, not back" gives license to collaborate.
daveweigel.bsky.social
So, imagine a 2028 that ends with a normal election and a Democratic president.

Does that president punish CBS? Does he kick it out of the Brady room's front row? Does his FCC go after its licenses? Does his FTC probe the Skydance deal?

No, probably not. No fear of reprisal if power shifts back.
gregsargent.bsky.social
Do CBS News executives understand that MAGA will not be in power forever? I genuinely think this is lost on a lot of people. They've gotten scammed by bad actors into believing Trump's 2024 win represented something seismic and even permanent. I predict they'll look back on this as a serious error.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
Dem leaders need to understand that policy and rhetorical concessions to the right won't move the needle, because these people aren't responding to real-world conditions, and the media entities will continue to lie about both what is happening and what Dem politicians are doing about it.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
CNN isn't even one of the worst offenders! People who watch Fox News or Newsmax or the local Sinclair affiliate (and probably CBS viewers in the near future) are being fed nonstop propaganda that the (Democrat-run) cities are dystopian hellscapes and Dem politicians only care about trans immigrants.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
Something I think well-intentioned people need to understand is a huge portion of the populace is living in a fictionalized world. They don't go to places like Portland (or LA or NYC) on a regular basis and have no clue what conditions are actually like. except what they see in reporting.
cnn.com
CNN @cnn.com · 2d
"President Donald Trump and his top aides are using the word 'insurrection' more frequently to describe anti-ICE protests in places like Portland," writes Zachary B. Wolf. https://cnn.it/4pWYmzr
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
This should be a national scandal. Shutdown or not, Speaker Johnson should not be depriving the people of Grijalva's district the representation they're entitled. That he is doing it in service of shielding GOP congressmembers from taking an Epstein file release vote is especially gross.
the-downballot.com
Updating this chart because the prior version is out of date. With Mike Johnson refusing to convene the House, the soonest Democrat Adelita Grijalva can get sworn in—and provide the 218th signature to force a vote on the Epstein files—is now three weeks after winning the #AZ07 special election.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
The "big tent" never seems to apply to people who oppose Israeli violence against Palestinians, or who want to redirect funding from police to other social services. Those people need to shut the fuck up. And if they win a primary, it's perfectly okay to tacitly support GOP candidates against them.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
The "big tent" concept gets invoked to protect conservative Dems who diverge from the mainstream of the party on issues like abortion rights, immigration, tax cuts for the wealthy. We can't criticize them, we're a big tent party and to become a majority, we must allow for these people in the tent.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
If you take "big tent" rhetoric seriously, sure. But the folks talking about the "big tent" mostly use the metaphor as a cudgel for imposing conservative politics onto a largely left-liberal coalition. Viewed in that framework, "big tent" has been a great governance strategy.
fleerultra.bsky.social
the thing about the big tent is we can debate its merits and successes as an electoral strategy, but it has been an abject failure as a governance strategy, and frankly what you do with power is more important than how often you win it. we are living through precisely why that’s so
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
It's just so hard to see a way out of this mess without an opposition party committed to meaningful opposition, as opposed to ceding the bullshit premise of the whole operation.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
We are so cooked as a country if mainline opposition party politicians are still parroting regime propaganda 10 months into this. The regime is consolidating power largely because other powerful people and institutions are pre-capitulating.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
We're 10 months into an authoritarian takeover premised on this pretext, and a sitting senator in the ostensibly opposition party is still validating regime propaganda. Wholly unfit for this moment in time.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
Concluding from 2024 that running on democracy doesn't work is like saying studying doesn't work after you fucked around for an entire semester, spent the day before the exam cramming for it, and then failed your exam.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
Dems in power spent 3 and a half years not only acting like things weren't a crisis (except in obnoxious fundraising texts), but marginalizing those who were raising alarms.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
Biden appointed an AG who slow-walked everything because he feared being perceived as partisan. Senate Dems decided they cared more about their weekend plans than having witnesses for Trump's impeachment. Biden stacked his Court reform commission with a bunch of institutionalists. And so on.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
I get that the Dems didn't have the votes for a new VRA or Court reform. But they also didn't really do anything to try to move their senate holdouts. There was no public pressure campaign. No effort to rally the base to demand Manchin et al stand up for democracy. If anything, it was the opposite.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
This is true, but also it's hard to claim with a straight face that the Dems "ran on democracy" in 2024. Sure, they cut a few ads about it. But that was on the heels of four years of slow-walking accountability for J6, failing to pass a new Voting Rights Act and throwing cold water on Court reform.
fleerultra.bsky.social
i’ve seen the “running on democracy didn’t work in 2024” line so many times the last 10 months and it is so emblematic of everything wrong with the dem party. abandoning something that fundamental because it didn’t work *one* time in one the weirdest elections this century
gregsargent.bsky.social
I asked Chris Murphy if he privately talks to Dem colleagues about why they don't sound the alarm loudly. His answers were depressing. Dems tell him they don't want to be "alarmist" or that "democracy" didn't work in 2024, so they want to stick to health care. 5/

newrepublic.com/article/2013...
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
Of course, I suspect the ultimate outcome won't be that everyone must prove citizenship before emergency care. It will only be people who appear to be noncitizens. So basically white people (regardless of immigration status) will get care, people of color will get delays and denials.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
In the wake of the Civil Rights Act, a lot of Southern communities paved over popular community pools rather than integrate them. This has similar energy. Hateful people so hateful they're making themselves demonstrably worse off just to spite the group they hate.
mahtininthesky.bsky.social
What if you don't have papers on you during an emergency? Or your emergency involves a head injury rendering you unable to comply with directions. Even if you have the proper paperwork with you, a few-minute delay in care to prove status could result in permanent, life-altering complications.