Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Reposted by Matthew K. Ribar

Cambridge University Press Political Science & IR @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org · 12d

#OpenAccess from @apsrjournal.bsky.social -

Land, Power, and Property Rights: The Political Economy of Land Titling in Sub-Saharan Africa - https://cup.org/46qHNnT

- @mattkribar.bsky.social

#FirstView

Banner image featuring the hashtag #OpenAccess on a green background above the text 'American Political Science Review' on a blue background.

1 3

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · 12d

Big thanks to my supportive advisors, the various groups who funded this research, my wife, and one particularly fussy editor:

1

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · 12d

The field survey in Cote d’Ivoire process-traces three intermediate steps: (1) strong chiefs lead to more titles because Ivorian chiefs have an incentive to facilitate rather than impede; (2) chiefs capture land management and exclude the local out-group; and (3) chiefs benefit from this capture.

1 2

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · 12d

But households aren’t the only actors here; traditional chiefs either facilitate titling (if the state devolved land governance, meaning that chiefs can capture these institutions) or impede it (if titling remains centralized).

1 1

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · 12d

First, if farmland isn’t valuable enough (or if there are limited returns to the kind of agricultural investment that titling facilitates, like fertilizing land or planting trees), then households won’t bother to title.

1 1

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · 12d

Back to the question, I marshal 170,216 household-level observations of titling across 22 African countries from both the DHS and LSMS programs, along with a geospatial strategy to measure land values and a field survey in Cote d’Ivoire.

1 1

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · 12d

Control over land tenure can also act as a reservoir of authority for traditional elites—meaning that property rights are a crucial arena in which to test when traditional elites complement or substitute for the state.

1 1

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · 12d

First: why should you care about land titling? Some recent Nobel prizes suggest that good institutions are a necessary condition for economic development. Where the agricultural sector still employs many households, secure land tenure is the ‘institution’ that counts.

1 1

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · 12d

Abundant research says formalizing land ownership is good for households, and land titles are available on-demand through much of Africa. But the below figure shows both low take-up overall and high amounts of variation within states. What gives?

$This figure shows the fraction of land-owning households who possess a formal land title for at least one parcel across 22 African countries. Data are from the Demographic and Health Surveys as well as the Living Standards Measurement Surveys.$

1 1

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · 12d

I’m thrilled that my job market paper, “Land, Power, and Property Rights: The Political Economy of Land Titling in sub-Saharan Africa,” is hot off the press and open-access at @apsrjournal.bsky.social. A quick thread featuring more than you ever wanted to know about land tenure.

1 4 18

Reposted by Matthew K. Ribar

Joachim Baumann @joachimbaumann.bsky.social · 26d

🚨 New paper alert 🚨 Using LLMs as data annotators, you can produce any scientific result you want. We call this **LLM Hacking**.

Paper: arxiv.org/pdf/2509.08825

$We present our new preprint titled "Large Language Model Hacking: Quantifying the Hidden Risks of Using LLMs for Text Annotation". We quantify LLM hacking risk through systematic replication of 37 diverse computational social science annotation tasks. For these tasks, we use a combined set of 2,361 realistic hypotheses that researchers might test using these annotations. Then, we collect 13 million LLM annotations across plausible LLM configurations. These annotations feed into 1.4 million regressions testing the hypotheses. For a hypothesis with no true effect (ground truth $p > 0.05$), different LLM configurations yield conflicting conclusions. Checkmarks indicate correct statistical conclusions matching ground truth; crosses indicate LLM hacking -- incorrect conclusions due to annotation errors. Across all experiments, LLM hacking occurs in 31-50\% of cases even with highly capable models. Since minor configuration changes can flip scientific conclusions, from correct to incorrect, LLM hacking can be exploited to present anything as statistically significant.$

5 94 260

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · Sep 5

This looks really interesting!

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · Aug 18

Rubio said no children died? Add that to the pile of lies. At least Musk admitted “he gave zero fucks.”

And all this? For a bunch of AI-generated hallucinations and outright lies about “corruption” at USAID.

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · Aug 18

By the way, in the initial wave of AI-powered program cuts, Lewin, Rubio, and Musk pinballed between cutting production contracts, then restoring production while cutting shipping, then cutting shipping while restoring production, etc.

1

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · Aug 18

Starting production takes time, arranging shipping takes time, the shipping itself takes time. That was true before they fired everybody and its even more true now.

1

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · Aug 18

This means food goes undelivered. Delays pile up. Much of the world’s supply of ready to use therapeutic food (RUTF) is made in either Lubbock, TX or Rhode Island, far from where it is used.

1

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · Aug 18

But Rubio, Musk, and Jeremy Lewin fired single person at USAID who knew how this process works. There are a handful of contracts officers (high-level) and program assistants (entry level) left, but none of the core staff who do the work (i.e. save lives).

1

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · Aug 18

This article highlights the fundamental lie behind Rubio’s claim that humanitarian aid is still flowing. Have grants been signed? A couple (massive cuts to humanitarian food). Has money been obligated? It’s starting to trickle. www.nytimes.com/2025/08/15/h...

A $45 Treatment Can Save a Starving Child. US Aid Cuts Have Frozen the Supply

www.nytimes.com

1 1 2

Reposted by Matthew K. Ribar

Ken Schultz @kschultz.bsky.social · Aug 17

Look, I hate to get all 1938 here, but this is exactly the same concession that Hitler made over Czechoslovakia.

Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com · Aug 17

Witkoff says the concessions that Russia has agreed to make is not gobbling up the entirety of Ukraine

3 25 67

Reposted by Matthew K. Ribar

Adam Bonica @adambonica.bsky.social · Aug 14

We took a close look at Split Ticket's WAR metric, which has become influential in Democratic circles for suggesting moderates significantly outperform progressives.

Our finding: The metric contains systematic biases that overstate the advantage of moderation. A corrected model shows no advantage.🧵

Do Moderates Do Better?

Uncovering Bias in Split Ticket’s WAR Scores

data4democracy.substack.com

7 51 140

Reposted by Matthew K. Ribar

🎃🪦 BLOODSUGARSETHMASKET 🪦🎃 @smotus.bsky.social · Aug 14

E.J. Antoni has more insurrections to his name than published papers

6 45 320

Reposted by Matthew K. Ribar

jamelle @jamellebouie.net · Aug 11

i mean, a genuinely striking thing about trump is that he basically never makes an appearance in the actual city outside

4 6 130

Reposted by Matthew K. Ribar

Saloni @scientificdiscovery.dev · Aug 5

Excellent article by Pratik Pawar on the consequences of cutting the Demographic and Health Surveys, and efforts to revive them. I'm quoted briefly.

The Demographic and Health Survey’s death, and potential revival, explained

Why this obscure survey from USAID has life-or-death stakes for global health. The Gates Foundation announced $25 million in emergency funding, but the long-term solution is far from clear.

www.vox.com

1 15 31

Reposted by Matthew K. Ribar

Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal @jayapal.house.gov · Aug 2

Trump and Republicans know that America’s presence and influence around the world is critical.

Yet they’re destroying USAID and other foreign programs, ceding our global leadership to China.

7 39 150

Matthew K. Ribar @mattkribar.bsky.social · Aug 4

The worst part about this "interview" is that all of Lewin's opinions are very obviously post hoc justifications. He went in with presumably ketamine fueled rage, destroyed everything, and made up a policy justification after.

1 2